Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:05:48.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of doctoral research in language assessment in Canada (2006–2011)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2013

Liying Cheng  and
Janna Fox
Liying Cheng
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Canadaliying.cheng@queensu.ca
Janna Fox
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Canadajanna_fox@carleton.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews a selected sample of 24 doctoral dissertations in language assessment (broadly defined), completed between 2006 and 2011 in Canadian universities. These dissertations fall into five thematic categories: 1) reliability, validity and factors affecting test performance; 2) washback (impact) and ethics; 3) raters, rating and rating scales; 4) classroom-based research: teaching, learning and assessment; and 5) vocabulary learning, lexical proficiency and lexical richness. The themes were categorized according to the International Language Testing Association (ILTA) bibliographical categorization index. We identify trends such as the methodological strength of complex mixed methods research design, which enhances the validity of the research findings: 16 (67%) took a pragmatic (rather than paradigmatic) approach in their use of mixed methods, with four (17%) opting for multi-method quantitative approaches and four (17%) for qualitative. We also discuss the depth and breadth of these dissertations and situate their scholarly contributions within Canadian and international research on language assessment.

Type
Surveys of Ph.D. Thesis
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 518 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, M. L. (2005). English reading strategies differences in Arabian and Mandarin speaker performance on the CLBA reading assessment (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (32659077).Google Scholar
Abbott, M. L. (2007). A confirmatory approach to differential item functioning on an ESL reading assessment. Language Testing 24.1, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, C. (2007). The challenge of (diagnostic) testing: Do we know what we are measuring? In Fox, J., Wesche, M., Bayliss, D., Cheng, L., Turner, C. & Doe, C. (eds.), Language testing reconsidered. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baba, K. (2007). Dimensions of lexical proficiency in writing summaries for an English as a foreign language test (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (33748472).Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing 17.1, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (2007). What is the construct? The dialectic of abilities and contexts in defining constructs in language assessment. In Fox, J., Wesche, M., Bayliss, D., Cheng, L., Turner, C. & Doe, C. (eds.), Language testing reconsidered. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press, 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, B. A. (2010). In the service of the stakeholder: A critical, mixed methods program of research in high-stakes language assessment (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR74366).Google Scholar
Barkaoui, K. (2007). Participants, texts, and processes in second language writing assessment: A narrative review of the literature. The Canadian Modern Language Review 64, 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkaoui, K. (2008). Effects of scoring method and rater experience on ESL essay rating processes and outcomes (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (35096546).Google Scholar
Bogdan, R. C. & Bicklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1997). How applied linguistics is the same as any other science. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7.1, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervatiuc, A. (2007). Highly proficient adult non-native English speakers’ perceptions of their second language vocabulary learning process (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR33791).Google Scholar
Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
Cheng, L. (2008). Washback, impact and consequences. In Shohamy, E. & Hornberger, N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment. New York: Springer, 349–364.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. & DeLuca, C. (2011). Voices from test-takers: Further evidence for test validation and test use. Educational Assessment 16.2, 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. & Curtis, A. (eds.) (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clandinin, J. & Connelly, M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Colby-Kelly, C. & Turner, C. (2007). AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness: Taking formative assessment to the next level. Canadian Modern Language Review 64.1, 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, D. C. (2010). Using ‘Assessment of learning’ practices with pre-university level ESL students: A mixed methods study of teacher and student performance and beliefs (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR61979).Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cumming, A. (1990). Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing 7, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doe, C. (2011). The integration of diagnostic assessment into classroom instruction. In Tsagari, D. & Csepes, I. (eds.), Classroom-based language assessment: Language testing and evaluation. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 63–76.Google Scholar
Douglas, S. R. (2010). Non-native English speaking students at university: Lexical richness and academic success (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR69496).Google Scholar
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd edn). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Farnia, F. (2006). Modeling growth in reading fluency and reading comprehension in EL1 and ESL children: A longitudinal individual growth curve analysis from first to sixth grade (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (33265070).Google Scholar
Fleming, D. J. (2007). Becoming Canadian: Punjabi ESL learners, national language policy and the Canadian language benchmarks (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (33664937).Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2003). From products to process: An ecological approach to bias detection. International Journal of Testing 3.1, 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. (2005). Rethinking second language acquisition requirements: Problems with language-residency criteria and the need for language assessment and support. Language Assessment Quarterly 2.2, 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. (2009). Moderating top-down policy impact and supporting EAP curricular renewal: Exploring the potential of diagnostic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. & Cheng, L. (2007). Did we take the same test? Differing accounts of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test by first and second language test takers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14.1, 9–26.Google Scholar
Fox, J. & P. Hartwick (2011). Taking a diagnostic turn: Reinventing the portfolio in EAP classrooms. In Tsagari, D. & Csepes, I. (eds.), Classroom-based language assessment. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 47–61.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing 13.2, 208–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L. (2007). Cognitive-psychometric modeling of the MELAB reading items (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (33905480).Google Scholar
Gao, L. & Rogers, W. T. (2011). Use of tree-based regression in the analyses of L2 reading test items. Language Testing 28, 77–104.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11, 255–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunning, P. (2011). ESL strategy use and instruction at the elementary school level: A mixed methods investigation (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR77521).Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1990). Second language writing: Assessment issues. In Kroll, B. (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1995). Rating non-native writing: The trouble with holistic scoring. TESOL Quarterly 29, 759–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for Applied Linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, S. A. (1997). Education and grounded theory. In Sherman, R. & Webb, R. (eds.), Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press, 123–140.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T. (2010). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of punctuation proficiency in non-native English-speaking graduate students (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (MR24877).Google Scholar
Isaacs, T. & Trofimovich, P. (2011). Phonological memory, attention control, and musical ability: Effects of individual differences on rater judgments of L2 speech. Applied Psycholinguistics 32, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, D. N. (2009). Language dia-logs: A collaborative approach for providing effective feedback on ESL learners’ verb errors in writing (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (37943444).Google Scholar
Kane, M. T. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 21.1, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. (2010). An argument-based validity inquiry into the empirically-derived descriptor-based diagnostic assessment in ESL academic writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Kwan, A. B. (2005). Impact of systemic phonics instruction on young children learning English as a second language (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (32659359).Google Scholar
Lado, J. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leedy, P. (1997). Practical research: Planning and design (6th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Limbos, M. (2005). Early identification of second-language students at risk for reading disability (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (32659383).Google Scholar
McKay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (ed.), Educational measurement (3rd edn). New York: Macmillan, 13–103.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing 13, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S. & Almond, R. C. (2003). On the structure of assessment arguments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 1.1, 3–62.Google Scholar
Morris, L. & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of TESL student performance. System 32.1, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, P. A., Girard, B. J. & Haniford, L. C. (2006). Validity in educational assessment. Review of Research in Education 30, 109–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, A. (2009). The impact of using a proficiency test as a placement tool: The case of Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) (doctoral dissertation). University of Laval, QC: Canada.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. (2010). What's in a grade? A mixed methods investigation of teacher assessment of grammatical ability in L2 academic writing (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR77532).Google Scholar
Qi, L. (2007). Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high-stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education 14.1, 51–74.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1997). Retuning in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7.1, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, M. (2012). What applied linguists do: An investigation of research practices in the field (Master's research essay). Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Seror, J. (2008). Socialization in the margins: Second language writers and feedback practices in university content courses (doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Shih, C. M. (2006). Perceptions of the General English Proficiency Test and its washback: A case study of two Taiwan technological institutes (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR16000).Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. & McNamara, T. (2009). Language tests for citizenship, immigration, and asylum. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal 6, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y. H. (2007). A narrative inquiry into classroom assessment: Stories of six Chinese adult learners of English as a second language (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (33969044).Google Scholar
Sterzuk, A. (2007). Dialect speakers, academic achievement, and power: First nations and Metis children in Standard English classrooms (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (34491819).Google Scholar
Suzuki, W. (2009). Languaging, direct correction, and second language writing: Japanese university students of English (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (37943556).Google Scholar
Tan, H. M. (2009). Changing the language of instruction of mathematics and science in Malaysia: The PPSMI policy and washback effect of bilingual high-stakes secondary school exit exams (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (39290869).Google Scholar
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tesch, R. (1994). The contribution of a qualitative method: Phenomenological research. In Langenbach, M., Vaughan, C. & Aagaard, L. (eds.), An introduction to educational research. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 143–157.Google Scholar
Turner, C. & Upshur, J. (2002). Rating scales derived from students samples: Effects of the scale maker and student sample on scale content and student scores. TESOL Quarterly 36.1, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakamoto, N. (2007). The impact of extroversion/introversion and associated learner strategies on English language comprehension in a Japanese EFL setting (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (33748547).Google Scholar
Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching: A case study using insights from testing and innovation theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2010). A study of the role of the ‘teacher factor’ in washback (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (NR74872).Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y. (2004). Teacher factors mediating washback. In Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. & Curtis, A. (eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 129–146.Google Scholar
Weigle, S. C. (1994). Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions. Language Testing 11, 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Retuning, calling the tune, and paying the piper: A reaction to Rampton. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8.1, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. (2008). Corrective feedback and Chinese learners’ acquisition of English past tense (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (38060335).Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. (2010). Chinese university students’ motivation, anxiety, global awareness, linguistic confidence, and English test performance: A causal and correlational investigation (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Theses Canada (39291111).Google Scholar