Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Review of washback research literature within Kane's argument-based validation framework

  • Liying Cheng (a1), Youyi Sun (a2) and Jia Ma (a3)
Abstract

No area of language assessment research in the past 20 years has received a greater increase in attention than washback research. Beginning with the seminal work of Alderson & Wall (Alderson & Wall 1993; Wall & Alderson 1993), an evolving body of empirical washback studies has been conducted worldwide, especially in countries where English is not the dominant language. A systematic search of the pertinent literature between 1993 and 2013 identified a total of 123 publications consisting of 36 review articles and 87 empirical studies. The focus of this review is on the empirical studies. A further breakdown of these empirical studies reveals 11 books and monographs, 27 doctoral dissertations, 40 journal articles, and 9 book chapters. This intensity of research activity underscores the timeliness and importance of this research topic and highlights its maturity, which in turn calls for this systematic review.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Review of washback research literature within Kane's argument-based validation framework
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Review of washback research literature within Kane's argument-based validation framework
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Review of washback research literature within Kane's argument-based validation framework
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Adair-Hauck , E. W. Glisan , K. Koda , E. B. Swender & P. Sandrock (2006). The Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA): Connecting assessment to instruction and learning. Foreign Language Annals 39, 359382.

J. C. Alderson & D. Wall (1993). ‘Does washback exist?Applied Linguistics 14, 115129.

J. C. Alderson & L. Hamp-Lyons (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A case study. Language Testing 13, 280297.

S. J. Andrews , J. Fullilove & Y. Wong (2002). Targeting washback: A case study. System 30, 207233.

L. F. Bachman (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly 2.1, 134.

K. M. Bailey (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing 13, 257279.

S. M. Brookhart (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record 106, 429458.

L. Cheng (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education 11, 3854.

L. Cheng (1998). Impact of a public English examination change on students’ perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 24.3, 279301.

L. Cheng (1999). Changing assessment: Washback on teacher perspectives and actions. Teaching and Teacher Education 15.3, 253271.

L. Cheng & C. DeLuca (2011). Voices from test-takers: Further evidence for test validation and test use. Educational Assessment 16.2, 104122.

L. Cheng , D. Klinger & Y. Zheng (2007). The challenges of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test for second language students. Language Testing 24.2, 185208.

L. Cheng , Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

A. Chik & S. Besser (2011). International language test taking among young learners: A Hong Kong case study. Language Assessment Quarterly 8.1, 7391.

J. Fox & L. Cheng (2007). Did we take the same test? Differing accounts of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test by first and second language test-takers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 14.1, 926.

A. Green (2006a). Washback to the learner: Learner and teacher perspectives on IELTS preparation course expectations and outcomes. Assessing Writing 11, 113134.

A. Green (2006b). Watching for washback: Observing the influence of the International English Language Testing System academic writing test in the classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly 3, 333368.

A. Green (2007a). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Studies in Language Testing 25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Cambridge ESOL.

A. Green (2007b). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-sessional language courses. Assessment in Education 14, 7597.

L. Hamp-Lyons (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing 14.3, 295303.

A. Hirai & R. Koizumi (2009). Development of a practical speaking test with a positive impact on learning using a story retelling technique. Language Assessment Quarterly 6, 151167.

S. Huang (2011). Convergent vs. divergent assessment: Impact on college EFL students’ motivation and self-regulated learning strategies. Language Testing 28, 251271.

S.-T. A. Hung (2012). A washback study on e-portfolio assessment in an English as a foreign language teacher preparation program. Computer Assisted Language Learning 25, 2136.

M. T. Kane (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 50.1, 173.

R. L. Linn (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher 29.2, 416.

G. F. Madaus (1985). Public policy and the testing profession: You’ve never had it so good? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 4.4, 511.

K. Menken (2006). Teaching to the test: How No Child Left Behind impacts language policy, curriculum, and instruction for English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal 30, 521546.

S. Messick (1996).Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing 13, 243256.

A. P. Muñoz & M. E. Álvarez (2010). Washback of an oral assessment system in the EFL classroom. Language Testing 27.1, 3349.

J. Murray , A. Riazi & J. Cross (2012). Test candidates’ attitudes and their relationship to demographic and experiential variables: The case of overseas trained teachers in NSW, Australia. Language Testing 29.4, 577595.

S. Saif (2006). Aiming for positive washback: A case study of international teaching assistants, Language Testing 23, 134.

C. M. Shih (2010). The washback of the General English Proficiency Test on university policies: A Taiwan case study. Language Assessment Quarterly 7, 234254.

E. Shohamy , S. Donitsa-Schmidt & I. Ferman (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing 13, 298317.

H. Torrance & J. Pryor (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal 27.5, 615631.

C. Turner (2006). Professionalism and high-stakes tests: Teachers’ perspectives when dealing with educational change introduced through provincial exams. TESL Canada Journal 23, 5476.

L. I. Virkiru (2011). From assessment to learning: The teaching of English beyond examinations. Educational Forum 75, 129142.

D. Wall (1996). Introducing new tests into traditional systems: Insights from general education and from innovation theory. Language Testing 13, 334354.

D. Wall & J. C. Alderson (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing 10, 4169.

Y. Watanabe (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing 13.3, 318333.

S. C. Weigle (2004). Integrating reading and writing in a competency test for non-native speakers of English. Assessing Writing 9, 2755.

A. Wigfield (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review 6.1, 4978.

A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation Contemporary Educational Psychology 25.1, 6881.

P. Winke (2011). Evaluating the validity of a high-stakes ESL test: Why teachers’ perceptions matter. TESOL Quarterly 45, 628660.

Q. Xie & S. Andrews (2012). Do test design and uses influence test preparation? Testing a model of washback with structural equation modeling. Language Testing 30.1, 4970.

C. Shih (2007). A new washback model of students’ learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review 64.1, 135162.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Teaching
  • ISSN: 0261-4448
  • EISSN: 1475-3049
  • URL: /core/journals/language-teaching
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 117
Total number of PDF views: 417 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 827 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.