Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:41:03.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real world project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Martin Bygate
Martin Bygate*
Affiliation:
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
*
Email: m.bygate@lancaster.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since Brumfit's landmark definition of applied linguistics as the theoretical and empirical study of real world problems in which language plays a central role (Brumfit, 2000), there have been periodic calls for applied linguistics to engage with problems experienced by people in real world contexts (such as teaching, health, business, law, social services, business or family), rather than problems of research methodology originating in the research community, and to work to address them, both in policy and practice (Bygate, 2004; Tarone, 2013, 2015; Shuy, 2015; Widdowson, 2017). This principle may well apply to all areas of applied linguistics, but in this piece I would like to explore it in relation to task-based language teaching (TBLT). This is because while TBLT is characteristically defined in terms of the needs and interests of language teachers and learners, it is also informed by research, which is heavily shaped by the priorities of the academy, an influence which can lead it away from some of its real world objectives. Yet if proponents fail to adequately address the priorities and needs of classroom stakeholders, proposals will be doomed to failure, a point acknowledged by many (see inter alia Gatbonton and Segalowitz (1988, 2005), Edwards and Willis (2005), Thornbury and Slade (2006), van den Branden (2006), Eckerth (2008), Andon and Eckerth (2009), Ellis (2009), Gatbonton (2015), Long (2015) and Samuda, Bygate, and van den Branden (2018)). That is, research needs to engage not just with models of second language acquisition (SLA), but with the practices, demands, pressures, and perspectives of stakeholders in real world language classrooms.

Type
First Person Singular
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 275 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadian, M. J., & García Mayo, M. d. P. (2018). Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Andon, N. (2018). Optimal conditions for TBLT? A case study of teachers’ orientation to TBLT in the commercial EFL for adults sector in the UK. In Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K. & Bygate, M. (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 131–164). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Andon, N., & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher's point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baralt, M. (2018). Becoming a task-based teacher educator: A case study. In Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K. & Bygate, M. (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 265–286). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Sanchez, H. S. (2015). Key issues in doing and supporting language teacher research. In Borg, S. & Sanchez, H. S. (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 1–13). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. D. (2007a). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (2007b). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. (2000). Individual freedom in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1988). Linguistic and strategic features of the language of learners working in oral communication exercises. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2003). Opposing the motion ‘Tasks are nothing new: they are just exercises with a new name’. In 1st ELTJ Debate with Guy Cook, 37th IATEFL Conference, Brighton, UK, April 2003.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2004). Some current trends in Applied Linguistics: Towards a generic view. AILA Review (40th Anniversary Issue), 17, 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (2016). TBLT through the lens of applied linguistics: Engaging with the real world of the classroom. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (2018a). Dynamic systems theory and the issue of predictability in task-based language: Some implications for research and practice in TBLT. In Ahmadian, M. J. & Garcia Mayo, M. d. P. (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 143–166). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2018b). Introduction. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (2018c). Creating and using the space for speaking within the foreign language classroom: What, why and how. In Alonso, R. A. (Ed.), Speaking in a second language (pp. 153–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.) (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2014). Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In Byrnes, H. & Manchón, R. M. (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and to L2 writing (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2015). Linking task and curricular thinking: An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 193–224). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4), 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., & Goodwin, J. (1991). Teaching pronunciation. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 136–153). New York, NY: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Collentine, J., & Collentine, K. (2013). A corpus approach to studying convergence in task-based Spanish L2 interaction. In McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 167–188). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakin, J. (1973). The language laboratory. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(Supplement 1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2018). Task repetition for language learning: A perspective from skill acquisition theory. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 27–42). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckerth, J. (2008). Task-based language learning and teaching – old wine in new bottles? In Eckerth, J. & Siekmann, S. (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 13–46). New York, NY: Lang.Google Scholar
Edwards, C., & Willis, J. (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Enhancing the development of professional performance: Implications from the study of deliberate practice. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), Development of professional expertise (pp. 405–431). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2015). ‘I'm still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Lexical diversity and lexical selection: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia Mayo, M. d. P. (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E. (2015). Task repetition to utterance repetition and accuracy. Presentation at the colloquium ‘Is task repetition repetition? How useful is it for teachers?’ In 6th Biennial TBLT Conference, Leuven, Belgium, September 2015.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1983). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1995). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edn). London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2013). Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean context. In McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, E., & Kobayashi, M. (2018). Second language learning through repeated engagement in a poster presentation task. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 223–254). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Pragmatics. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1978). Skill theory and language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (2018). Perform, reflect, recycle: Enhancing task repetition in second language speaking classes. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 193–222). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2001). A case of exercising’: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (Eds.) (2013). Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker, M. (2018a). The challenge of thinking task-based teaching from the learners’ perspectives: Developing teaching competences through an action research approach to teacher education. In Ahmadian, M. J. & García Mayo, M. d. P. (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 233–258). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker, M. (2018b). The challenges of integrating focus on form within tasks: Findings from a classroom research project in secondary EFL classrooms. In Samuda, V., van den Branden, K. & Bygate, M. (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 97–130). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker-von Ditfurth, M. (2011). Teaching English: Task-supported language learning. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. F. (1993). Evaluating language learning tasks in the classroom. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context (pp. 139–161).Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Newton, J., & Bui, T. (2018). Teaching with tasks in EFL classrooms in Vietnam. In Ahmadian, M. J. & García Mayo, M. d. P. (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 259–278). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nguyen, B. T., Newton, J., & Crabbe, D. (2018). Teacher transformation of textbook tasks in Vietnamese EFLT high school classrooms. In Samuda, V., van den Branden, K. & Bygate, M. (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 51–70). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nguyen, G. V. (2012). Readiness for task-based language teaching: A case study of Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2018). Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective: The case of a writing task. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 279–310). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: linking theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1987). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(4), 493–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., & Doughty, C. J. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A. (2005). Task repetition with 10-year old children. In Edwards, C. & Willis, J. (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 113–126). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A. (2007). Benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year old children practising with communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2009). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. & Norris, J. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 193–226). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2015). The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARCS model of pedagogic task sequencing. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 87–122). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., Bygate, M., & van den Branden, K. (2018). Introduction: Towards a researched pedagogy. In Samuda, V., van den Branden, K. & Bygate, M. (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Rounds, P. L. (1993). Critical episodes: Reference points for analysing a task in action. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context (pp. 125–138). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., van den Branden, K., & Bygate, M. (Eds.) (2018). TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N. (Eds.) (2003). (SI) Language in the workplace. Applied Linguistics, 24/3.Google Scholar
Sauro, S. (2013). The cyber language exchange: Cross-national computer-mediated interaction. In McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 129–146). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N. (2016). The role of input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. (2015). Applied linguistics past and future. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London, UK: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevick, E. W. (1976/1996). Memory, meaning and method. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, M. (2018). Applied linguistics: A consumer's view. Language Teaching, 51(2), 246–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, M., & Walter, C. (2005). The new Cambridge English course. Book 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (2013). Applied linguists without borders. Language Teaching, 46(3), 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (2015). Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925–2015 and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 444–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. L. (1988). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornbury, S., & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based teaching in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. & Norris, J. M. (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vandommele, G., van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2018). Task-based language teaching: How task-based is it really? In Samuda, V., van den Branden, K. & Bygate, M. (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 165–198). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. M. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E., & Toth, P. (2013). Building explicit L2 Spanish knowledge through guided induction in small-group and whole-class interaction. In McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 89–108). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1979–1980). Reading and thinking in English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2017). Disciplinarity and disparity in applied linguistics. Invited plenary at the 50th Anniversary BAAL Annual Meeting, University of Leeds, UK, 31 August–2 September 2017.Google Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Yule, G., & Macdonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40(4), 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar