Abbs, B., Ayton, A. & Freebairn, I. (1975). Strategies. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Amzilotti, G. I. (1983). Searching for linguistic universals through contrastive analysis. Cross-language Studies, 10, 1–17.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. (1975). Say What You Mean in English. London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Arndt, H. & Ryan, A. (1986). An ordered inventory of communicative functions for general foreign language teaching. In Kasper, G. (ed.) (1986), Learning, teaching and communication in the foreign language classroom, 145–61. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, M. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, M. & Heritage, J. (1984) Structures of social action: studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barnlund, D. & Araki, S. (1984). Intercultural encounters: the management of compliments by Japanese and Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 1, 9–26.Google Scholar

Birch, D. (1982). The Birmingham school of discourse analysis and communicative approaches to language teaching. RELC Journal 13, 2, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. (1982). Learning to say what you mean in a second language: a study of the speech act performance of Hebrew second language learners. Applied Linguistics, 3, 1, 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: a cross cultural study of speech act realisation patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 3, 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (eds.) (in press). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar

British Council, The (1984). Basic Oral Communication Skills. London: Longman in association with The British Council.Google Scholar

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. (1979). From defining to designing: communicative specifications versus communicative methodology in foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the ACTFL/Goethe Institut Conference, New York. Reprinted in Brumfit, C. J. (1985), Language and literature teaching: from practice to principle. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. (1981). Notional syllabuses revisited: a response. Applied Linguistics, 2, 1, 90–2.Google Scholar

Bung, K. (1973). The foreign language needs of waiters and hotel staff. Council of Europe, CCC/EES (75) 16 rev.Google Scholar

Burton, D. (1980). Dialogue and discourse: a sociolinguistic approach to modern drama dialogue and naturally occurring conversation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Candlin, C. N. & Edelhof, C. (1982). Challenges. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Carrier, M. & Haines, S. (1985). Break into English. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. D. & Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: the case of apology. Language Learning, 31, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.) (1975). Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. (1982). English for life. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. (1985). Language functions, social factors, and second language learning and teaching. IRAL, 23, 3, 177–98. 177–98.Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. (1981). Poison to your soul: thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational routine, 66–91. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Coulthard, M. (1985). An introduction to discourse analysis. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Coulthard, R. M. & Montgomery, M. (eds.) (1981). Studies in discourse analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Daikahara, M. (1986). A study of compliments from a cross-cultural perspective: Japanese vs. American English. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 2, 2, 103–35.Google Scholar

Doff, A., Jones, C. & Mitchell, K. (1983). Meanings into words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edmondson, W. (1981 a). Spoken discourse: amodel for analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Edmondson, W. (1981 b). Illocutionary verbs, illocutionary acts, and conversational behaviour. In Eikmeyer, J. J. & Rieser, H. (eds.).Google Scholar

Fraser, B. (1974). An analysis of vernacular performative verbs. In Shuy, R. W. & Bailey, C.-J. N. (eds.), Towards tomorrow's linguistics, 139–58. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, B., Rintell, E. & Walters, J. (1980). An approach to conducting research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. In Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed.), 75–91.Google Scholar

Garton, Sprenger J., Jupp, T. C., Milne, J. & Prowse, P. (1982). Encounters. London: Heineman.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, Morgan, , 40–58.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. T. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). In Halliday: system and function in language. Selected paper edited by Gunther Kress. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1980). Language as code and language as behaviour: a systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In Lamb, S. & Makkai, A. (eds.), Semiotics in culture and language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hancher, M. (1979). The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 8, 1–14.Google Scholar

Hatch, E. (1981). Foreword to N. Wolfson & E. Judd (1983), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition, ix-xx. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Hawkins, E. (1981). Modern languages in the curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, C. P. (1977). Review of Van Ek (1975). ELT Journal, 31, 4, 334–5.Google Scholar

House, J. (1982). Conversational strategies in German and English dialogues. In Nickel, G. and Nehls, D. (eds.), Error Analysis, Contrastive Linguistics and Second Language Learning (special issue of IRAL).Google Scholar

House, J. & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conventional routine. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

House-Edmondson, J. (1987). Interlanguage pragmatics: requesting in a foreign language. Paper presented at 8th AILA conference, Sydney.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Janicki, K. (1985). The foreigner's language. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Jarvella, R. J. & Collas, J. G. (1974). Memory for the intentions of sentences. Memory and Cognition, 2, 185–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Kasper, G. (1981). Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.Google Scholar

Kasper, G. (1987). Dimensions of request modification. Paper presented at 8th AILA conference, Sydney.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (1979). Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kempson, R. (1977). Semantic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kitagawa, C. (1980). Saying ‘yes’ in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, 105–20.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 340–73. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. & Fanshell, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar

Larsen, Freeman D. (ed.), (1980). Discourse analysis in second language research. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Lee, W. R. (1983). A study dictionary of social English. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1981). Semantics (Second Edn.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1980). Speech act theory: the state of the art. Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 13, 2–24.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Littlewood, W. T. (1983). Contrastive pragmatics and the foreign language learner's personality. In Brumfit, C. J. (ed.), Learning and teaching languages for communication: applied linguistics perspectives, 90–7. London: CILT.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1981). Language and linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1981). How many speech acts? U.E.A.Papers in Linguistics, 14, 5, 42–77.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, M. L. (1984). Conversation: how talk is organised. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage.Google Scholar

Munby, J.(1978).Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Munby, J. (1983). Communicative syllabus design:principles and problems. Paper given at RELC Seminar on New Trends in Language Syllabus Design.Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ohmann, R.(1972).Instrumental style: notes on the theory of speech as action. In Kachru, B. B. and Stahlke, H. F. W., (eds.), Current trends in stylistics (Papers in Linguistics:monograph series, 2, 115—41). Edmonton, Ill.: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar

Palmer, H. E. (1917). The scientific study and teaching of languages. London: Harrap. Republished (1968) by Oxford University Press, edited by Mackin., R.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A.(1978). Compliment responses; notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Schenkein, J. (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 79–112. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (1983). Conversational analysis. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (eds.) Language and communication, 117–54. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Riley, P. (1981). Towards a contrastive pragmatics. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Contrastive linguistics and the language teacher, 121–46. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Rintell, E. (1979). Getting your speech act together. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 17, 97–106.Google Scholar

Rossner, R., Shaw, P., Shepherd, J., Taylor, J. & Davies, P. (1979). Contemporary English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication: an introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice:formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. Reprinted in Giglioli, P. (ed.) (1972), Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1977). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In Dressier, W. (ed.), Current trends in text linguistics, 81–102. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 4, 289–327.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. & Richards, J. C. (1980). Speech acts and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 1, 2, 129–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? In Black., M. (ed.) Philosophy in America. Allen &Unwin and Cornell University Press. Reprinted in Searle, J. R. (ed.) (1971), The philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, & Morgan, , 59–82.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1979). An interview. In Boyd, J. & Ferrara, S.Speech acts ten years after, 17–27. Milan: Versus.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. MCH. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. Mc. H. & Brazil, D. (1982). Teacher talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Soars, J. & Soars, L. (1986). Headway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stenstrom, A. (1984). Questioning strategies in English and Swedish conversation. Paper delivered at AILA, 1984. Brussels.Google Scholar

Stratton, F. (1977). Putting the communicative (notional) syllabus in its place. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 2.Google Scholar

Sweet, H. (1899). The practical study of language: a guide for teachers and learners. London: Dent. Republished by Oxford University Press (1964), edited by Mackin., R.Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. & Cameron, D. (1987). Analyzing conversation. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. A. (1983). Cross cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 2, 91–112.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. A. (1984). Cross cultural discourse as ‘unequal encounter’: towards a pragmatic analysis. Applied Linguistics 5, 3, 226–235.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M. (1973). Draft outline of a European unit/credit system for modern language learning by adults. In Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Republished (1980) under the same title. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Trim, J. L. M. (1984). Progress towards a more comprehensive framework for the definition of language-learning objectives. In Van Ek, J. A. and Trim, J. L. M., Across the Threshold, 123–128. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Van Ek, J. A. & Alexander, L. G. (1975). Threshold Level English. Oxford: Pergamon for the Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Vendler, Z. (1972). Res cogitans; an essay in rational psychology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, M. & Keane, J. (1986). Time for English. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Watcyn-Jones, P. (1978). Penguin Functional English. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Whitney, N. (1984). Checkpoint English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (1985). A semantic metalanguage for a crosscultural comparison of speech acts and speech genres. Language in Society, 14, 491–514.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. A. (1973). The linguistic and situational content of the common core in a unit/credit system. In Trim, J. L. M., Richterich, R., Van Ek, J. A. & Wilkins, D. (eds.), Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. A. (1981). Notional syllabuses revisited. Applied Linguistics, 2, 1, 83–90.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. A. (1983). Some issues in communicative language teaching and their relevance to the teaching of languages in secondary schools. In Johnson, K. & Porter, D. (eds.), Perspectives in communicative language teaching, 23–37. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Willis, D. J. (1983). The implications of discourse analysis for the teaching of oral communication. Unpublished PHD thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar

Wolfson, N. (1981). Compliments in cross-cultural perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 2, 117–124.Google Scholar