Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Vague language in business and academic contexts

  • Michael McCarthy (a1)

Abstract

Business English and academic English may perhaps be thought of as areas of language use requiring precision of expression and a quest for specific and unambiguous meaning. However, corpus evidence shows that both types of language, in their spoken contexts, exhibit noticeable use of the kinds of vague expressions found in everyday conversation. In this lecture, I focus on one type of vagueness: vague category marking (VGM). This feature involves mention of an example or examples of something followed by reference to a broad, ad hoc category of which the chosen examples are seen as typical. References to categories commonly involve expressions such as or whatever, and so on, or something (like that). In both business and academic English, vague category marking is an important projection of shared knowledge and shared identities. In business, vagueness is also a useful tool in delicate negotiations. In academic English, vague categories refer to bodies of assumed shared knowledge and are crucial in the pedagogic process of grafting new knowledge onto old. Subtle differences are drawn out by different types of vague category markers. I conclude with some implications for teaching in these specialised areas.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

Revised version of a keynote lecture given at the 3rd Languages in the Globalised World International Conference, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK, 23 May 2018.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Adolphs, S., Atkins, S., & Harvey, K. (2007). Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts. In Cutting, J. (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 6278). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aijmer, K. (2015). General extenders in learner language. In Groom, N., Charles, M., & John, S. (Eds.), Corpora, grammar and discourse. In honour of Susan Hunston (pp. 211234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chan, C. (2017). Investigating a research-informed teaching idea: The use of transcripts of authentic workplace talk in the teaching of spoken business English. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 7289.
Chan, C. (2018). Proposing and illustrating a research-informed approach to curriculum development for specific topics in business English. English for Specific Purposes, 52, 2746.
Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(2), 155193.
Clancy, B., & McCarthy, M. (2014). Co-constructed turn taking. In Aijmer, K. & Ruehlemann, C. (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 430453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cotterill, J. (2007). ‘I think he was kind of shouting or something’: Uses and abuses of vagueness in the British courtroom. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 97–114). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cutting, J. (1999). The grammar of the in-group code. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 179202.
Cutting, J. (2006). Spoken grammar: Vague language and EAP. In Hughes, R. (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics (pp. 159–181). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cutting, J. (Ed.). (2007). Vague language explored. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dines, E. (1980). Variation in discourse and stuff like that. Language in Society, 9(1), 1333.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Language use in institutional and work-place settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dubois, S. (1992). Extension particles, etc. Language Variation and Change, 4(2), 179203.
Evison, J., McCarthy, M., & O'Keeffe, A. (2007). ‘Looking out for love and all the rest of it’: Vague category markers as shared social space. In Cutting, J. (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 138157). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 6392). Lanham MD: University Press of America.
Jucker, A., Smith, S., & Lüdge, T. (2003). Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 17371769.
Koester, A. (2010). Workplace discourse. London: Continuum.
Malyuga, E., & McCarthy, M. (2018). English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 135, 3952.
McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, M., & Handford, M. (2004). ‘Invisible to us’: A preliminary corpus-based study of spoken business English. In Connor, U. & Upton, T. (Eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective (pp. 167201). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Metsä-Ketelä, M. (2012). Frequencies of vague expressions in English as an academic lingua franca. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(2), 263285.
Metsä-Ketelä, M. (2016). Pragmatic vagueness: Exploring general extenders in English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(3), 325351.
O'Keeffe, A., & Adolphs, S. (2008). Response tokens in British and Irish discourse: Corpus, context and variational pragmatics. In Schneider, K. P. & Barron, A. (Eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages (pp. 6998). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
O'Keeffe, A. (2004). ‘Like the wise virgins and all that jazz’ – using a corpus to examine vague language and shared knowledge. In Connor, U. & Upton, T. (Eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective (pp. 120). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
O'Keeffe, A. (2006). Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge.
Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that. New York: Oxford University Press.
Overstreet, M. (2005). And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 18451864.
Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (1997). On being explicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 25(3), 250258.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696735.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed