Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-6sxsx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-10T05:42:23.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2017

Phil Benson
Phil Benson*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australiaphilip.benson@mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Those who have advocated social approaches to applied linguistics have often been critical of the individualism of second language acquisition (SLA) research. This paper identifies the emergence of a more balanced view of the social and individual in recent work. Adopting Berger's (1972) metaphor of ‘ways of seeing’, it offers a history of applied linguistics based on three eras: the era of ‘the invisible learner’, the era of ‘learner-centredness’, and the era of ‘person-centredness’, which we may now be entering. It suggests dominant research methodologies have led to the particular ways of seeing language learners that are characteristic of each of the three eras. In spite of the critique of individualism, the preference for individual case studies in social approaches is leading to a new theoretical focus on the individual that may be best captured by the term ‘person-centredness’.

Information

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 60 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Revised version of a plenary address given at the Psychology of Language Learning (PLL) 2 Conference, University of Jyväskalä, Finland, 24 August 2016.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30, 109–137.Google Scholar
Benson, P. & Cooker, L. (eds.) (2013). The applied linguistics individual: Sociocultural approaches to identity, agency and autonomy. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics 17.1, 63–83.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, M. P. (1985). The social context of language learning – a neglected situation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7.2, 135–158.Google Scholar
Breen, M. P. (ed.) (2001). Learner contributions to language learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1998). Language Learning and applied linguistics: A historical sketch. Language Learning 48.4, 465–496.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2015). Afterword. In Peters et al. (eds.), 271–276.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group, The (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal 100.S1, 19–47.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. & Doherty, L. (2015). Examining agency in (second) language socialization research. In Peters et al. (eds.), 54–72.Google Scholar
Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81.3, 285–300.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. London: Prentice Hall, 119–129.Google Scholar
Jesperson, O. (1904). How to teach a foreign language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kibler, K. A. & Valdés, G. (2016). Conceptualizing language learners: Socioinstitutional mechanisms and their consequences. The Modern Language Journal 100.S1, 96–116.Google Scholar
King, K. A. & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology and second language studies: Trends, concerns and new directions. The Modern Language Journal 100.S1, 209–227.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2002). Introduction: ‘How can we tell the dancer from the dance’. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum, 1–30.Google Scholar
Lafford, B. A. (2007). Second language acquisition reconceptualized? The impact of Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 91 (focus issue), 285–300.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 78, 418–420.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1996) Second language acquisition theory-building: ‘Letting all the flowers bloom!’ Language Learning 46.4, 713–749.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen (ed.), 141–158.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Individual cognitive/affective learner contributions and differential success in SLA. In Breen (ed.), 12–24.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. & Williams, M. (eds.) (2014). Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norton Pierce, B. (1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29.1, 9–31.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation in imagined communities and the language classroom. In Breen (ed.), 159–171.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Peters, D., Gao, X., Miller, E. R. & Vitanova, G. (eds.) (2015). Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pickett, G. D. (1977). The foreign language learning process. ETIC Occasional Report. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1991). Second language learners in a stratified multilingual setting. Applied Linguistics 12.3, 229–248.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21, 87–111.Google Scholar
Riley, P. (2003). Self-access as access to ‘self’: Cultural variation in the notions of self and personhood. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 92–109.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. & Yule, G. (1991). Focus on the language learner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2007). Autonomy/agency through socio-cultural lenses. In Barfield, A. & Brown, S. (eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 231–242.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. & Norton, B. (2003). Learner autonomy as agency in sociocultural settings. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 58–72.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24.3, 199–210.Google Scholar
Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics 23.1, 32–55.Google Scholar
Williams, M., Burden, R. L. & Al-Baharna, S. (2001). Making sense of success and failure: The role of the individual in motivation theory. In Dörnyei, Z. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Research Center, 171–184.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L. (1991). Second language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In Bialystok, E. (ed.), Language processing in bilingual children. Cambridge University Press, 49–69.Google Scholar
Zuengler, J. & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly 40.1, 35–58.Google Scholar