Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:30:57.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Writing in L1 and L2: analysing and evaluating learners' texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley
Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley
Affiliation:
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 69 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, C. L. (1977). A study of the effect of selected mechanical errors on teachers' evaluation of the non-mechanical aspects of students' writing. DAI 37: 5554–A. ED 147 812.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. B. & Corder, S. P. (eds.) (1974). The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allwright, R. L., Woodley, M-P., & Allwright, J. M. (1988). Investigating reformulation as a practical strategy for the teaching of academic writing. Applied Linguistics 9, 236–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelis, P. J. (1975). Sentence combining, error analysis and the teaching of writing. In M. K. Burt & H. Dulay (eds.).Google Scholar
Azevedo, M. M. (1980). The interlanguage of advanced learners: an error analysis of graduate students' Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 217–27.Google Scholar
Bamberg, B. (1984). Assessing coherence: a reanalysis of essays written for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1969–1979. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 305–19.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11 1, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. (1965). A tagmemic approach to paragraph analysis. College Composition and Communication, 16, 237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. T. (1974). Error analysis: a recent pseudoprocedure in applied linguistics. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 25/6, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, J. D. & Greaves, W. S. (eds.) (1985). Systemic perspectives on discourse 2: selected papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Advances in Discourse Processes, 16. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bhatia, A. T. (1974). An error analysis of students' composition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 337–50.Google Scholar
Bloor, T. & Norrish, J. (eds.) (1987). Written language. British Studies in Applied Linguistics, 2. London: CILT Publications.Google Scholar
Blount, N. S., Johnson, S. L. & Fredrick, W. C. (1968). A comparison in the writing of eighth- and twelfth-grade students, Technical Report No. 78. Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin: Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Britton, B. K. & Black, J. B. (eds.) (1985). Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Britton, J. N., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A. & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan Education Ltd.Google Scholar
Brodkey, D. & Young, R. (1981). Composition correctness scores. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1989). Making sense: the interaction of linguistic expression and contextual information. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. (ed.) (1976). Papers in Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning Special Issue No. 4.Google Scholar
Bruce, B., Rubin, A. & Starr, K. (1981). Why readability formulas fail. Reading Education Report No. 28. Urbana, ILL: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading, ED 205 915.Google Scholar
Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, M. K. & Dulay, H. (eds.) New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education. On TESOL '75. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar
Buteau, M. F. (1970). Students' errors and the learning of French as a second language: a pilot study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charolles, M. (1978). Introduction aux problèmes de la cohérence des textes. Langue Française, 38, 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, F. (1965). A generative rhetoric of the paragraph. College Composition and Communication, 16, 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combettes, B. (1977). Ordre des éléments de la phrase et linguistique du texte. Pratiques, 13, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combettes, B. (1978). Thématisation et progression thématique dans les récits d'enfants. Langue Française, 38, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, W. E. (1976). Further effects of sentence-combining practice on writing ability. Research in the Teaching of English, 10, 137–49.Google Scholar
Combs, W. E. (1977). Sentence-combining practice: Do gains in judgment of writing ‘quality’ persist? Journal of Educational Research, 70, 318–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. (1987 a). Research frontiers in writing analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 4, 677–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. (1987 b). Argumentative patterns in student essays: cross-cultural differences. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 57–72.Google Scholar
Connor, U. & Kaplan, R. B. (eds.) (1987). Writing across languages: analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Connor, U. & Lauer, J. (1985). Understanding persuasive essay writing: linguistic/rhetorical approach. Text, 5, 4, 309–26.Google Scholar
Coombs, V. (1986). Syntax and communicative strategies in intermediate German composition. Modern Language Journal, 70, 2, 114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C. R. (1977). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (eds.).Google Scholar
Cooper, C. R. (1983). Procedures for describing written texts. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor & S. Walmsley (eds.), 287–313.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. R. & Odell, L. (1977). Evaluating writing: describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. R. & Greenbaum, S. (1986). Studying writing: linguistic approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. C. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second-language learners of German. Journal of Educational Research, 69, 5, 176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, T. C. (1977). A strategy for teaching writing. Modern Language Journal, 61, 251–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, T. C. (1981). Sentence combining: an experiment in teaching writing. Modern Language Journal, 65, 158–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, T. C. & Morain, G. (1980). A study of sentence-combining techniques for developing written and oral fluency in French. French Review, 53, 411–23.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. C., Morain, G. & Kalivoda, T. (1980). Sentence combining in second language instruction. Language in Education Series, No. 31. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics/ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics ED 195 167.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. In J. P. B. Allen & S. P. Corder (eds.), 122–54.Google Scholar
Couture, B. (1985). A systematic analysis of writing quality. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (eds.), 67–87.Google Scholar
Couture, B. (ed.) (1986). Functional approaches to writing: research perspectives. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers' quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 223–31.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at 3 grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 185–201.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. & Piché, G. L. (1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 101–9.Google Scholar
Crowley, S. (1989). Linguistics and composition instruction: 1950–1980. Written Communication, 6, 4, 480–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 1, 81–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daiker, D., Kerek, A. & Morenberg, M. (1978). Sentence combining and syntactic maturity in freshman English. College Composition and Communication, 29, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daiker, D., Kerek, A. & Morenberg, M. (eds.) (1979). Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. Conway, Arkansas: University of Akron and University of Central Arkansas.Google Scholar
Dale, E. & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37–54.Google Scholar
D'Angelo, F. (1974). A generative rhetoric of the essay. College Composition and Communication, 25, 388–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, A., Kantor, R. N., Hannah, J., Hermon, G., Lutz, R. & Salzillo, R. (1980). Limitations of readability formulas in guiding adaptations of texts. Technical Report No. 162. Urbana, ILL: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading, ED 184 090.Google Scholar
Dehghanpisheh, E. (1978). Language development in Farsi and English: implications for the second-language learner. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 1, 45–61.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Discourse analysis: its development and application to the structure of news. Journal of Communication, 33, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, E. (1970). Indexes of syntactic maturity (Dixon-Hunt-Christensen). ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills ED 091 748.Google Scholar
Dommergues, J.-Y. & Lane, H. (1978). On two independent sources of error in learning the syntax of a second language. Language Learning, 26, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doushaq, M. H. (1986). An investigation into stylistic errors of Arab students learning English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 5, 1, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 4, 347–76.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1985 a). Coherence, composition, and text linguistics. In N. E. Enkvist (ed.), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1985 b). Stylistics, text linguistics, and composition. Text, 5, 251–67.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (ed.) (1985). Coherence and composition: a symposium. Åbo, Finland: Publications of the Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1987). Text linguistics for the applier: an orientation. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 23–43.Google Scholar
Evensen, L. S. (1985). Discourse-level interlanguage studies. In N. E. Enkvist (ed.).Google Scholar
Fagan, W. T. & Hayden, H. M. (1988). Writing processes in French and English of fifth grade French immersion students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 44, 4, 653–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faigley, L. (1979). Another look at sentences. Freshman English News, 7, 3, 18–21.Google Scholar
Faigley, L. (1980). Names in search of a concept: maturity, fluency, complexity and growth in written syntax. College Composition and Communication, 31, 3, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. & Spiegel, D. L. (1986). Textual cohesion and coherence in children's writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 3, 263–80.Google Scholar
Flahive, D. & Snow, B. G. (1980). Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions. In J. W. Oiler & K. Perkins (eds.).Google Scholar
Flesch, R. (1949). The art of readable writing. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (1980). Writing in the college years: some indices of growth. College Composition and Communication, 31, 3, 311–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (1984). Why students can't write arguments. English in Education, 18, 2, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (eds.) (1980). Reinventing the rhetorical tradition. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Freedman, A., Pringle, I. & Yalden, J. (eds.) (1983). Learning to write: first language/second language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In T. Givón (ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, J., Haslett, B. & Gauntt, H. (1988). Structure and content in 8th graders' summary essays. Discourse Processes, 11, 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götz, J. & Hülmann, H. (1988). Von der Textaufgabe zum Zieltext (II). Die Neueren Sprachen, 87, 5, 506–38.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (1984). Written discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, M. (1971). A conceptual rhetoric of the composition. College Composition and Communication, 22, 348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauberg, W. (1971). Error analysis in German of first year university students. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (eds.).Google Scholar
Green, P. S. & Hecht, K. (1985). Native and non-native evaluation of learners' errors in written discourse. System, 13, 2, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grobe, C. (1981). Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 75–85.Google Scholar
Haden, R. (1987). Discourse error analysis. In J. Monaghan (ed.), 134–46.Google Scholar
Hake, R. L. & Williams, J. M. (1979). Sentence expanding: not can, or how, but when. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (eds.).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halloway, D. W. (1981). Semantic grammars: how they help us teach writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (1974). The insufficiency of error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartnett, C. G. (1986). Static and dynamic cohesion: signals of thinking in writing. In B. Couture (ed.), 142–53.Google Scholar
Haswell, R. H. (1988). Length of text and the measurement of cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 4, 428–33.Google Scholar
Hatim, B. (1987). A text linguistic model for the analysis of discourse errors: contributions from Arabic linguistics. In J. Monaghan (ed.), 102–13.Google Scholar
Hennig, K. R. Jr., (1980). Composition writing and the functions of language. DAI 41: 2424–A.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. Jr., (1986). Research on written composition. New directions for teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Urbana, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Homburg, T. J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, C. A. (1986). Global marking of rhetorical frame in text and reader evaluation. In B. Couture (ed.), 154–68.Google Scholar
Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar
Hunt, K. W. (1970 a). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, 1. Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, K. W. (1970 b). Do sentences in the second language grow like those in the first? TESOL Quarterly, 4, 3, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K. W. (1971). Teaching syntactic maturity. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (eds.).Google Scholar
Inghilleri, M. (1989). Learning to mean as a symbolic and social process: the story of ESL writers. Discourse Processes, 12, 3, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobovits, L. A. (1969). Second language learning and transfer theory: a theoretical assessment. Language Learning, 19, 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, S. E. (1981). Rhetorical information as prediction. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statements: linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.).Google Scholar
Kameen, P. T. (1978). A mechanical, meaningful, and communicative framework for ESL sentence combining exercises. TESOL Quarterly, 12, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameen, P. T. (1983). Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality. In A. Frcedman, I. Pringle & J. Yalden (eds.), 170.Google Scholar
Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieras, D. E. & Just, M. (eds.) (1984). New methods in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
King, M. L. & Rentel, V. M. (1979). Towards a theory of early writing development. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 243–53.Google Scholar
La Brant, L. L. (1933). A study of certain language developments of children in grades 4–12 inclusive. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 14, 4, 387–491.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1988). The syntactic complexity of written texts in Spanish as a foreign language: a markedness perspective. Hispania, 71, 4, 933–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Strom, V. S. (1977). The construction of a second-language acquisition index of development. Language Learning, 27, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautamatti, L. (1978). Some observations on cohesion and coherence in simplified texts. In J. O. O˚stman (ed.), 165–81.Google Scholar
Lautamatti, L. (1987). Observations on the development of the topic of simplified discourse. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 87–114.Google Scholar
Levenston, E. A. (1978). Error analysis of free composition: the theory and the practice. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
Lindeberg, A. C. (1985). Abstraction levels in student essays. Text, 5, 4, 327–46.Google Scholar
Lintermann-Rygh, L. (1985). Connector density – an indicator of essay quality? Text, 5, 4, 347–58.Google Scholar
McCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 1, 62–76.Google Scholar
McLure, E. & Geva, E. (1983). The development of cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 4, 411–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C. & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: a theory of text organisation. In L. Polanyi (ed.).Google Scholar
Martlew, M. (ed.) (1983). The psychology of written language. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mellon, J. C. (1969). Transformational sentence-combining: a method for enhancing the development of syntactic fluency in English composition, NCTE Research Report No. 10. Champaign, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar
Mellon, J. C. & Kinneavy, J. (1979). Issues in the theory and practice of sentence combining: 20-year perspective. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (eds.).Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organisation of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: purposes, procedures, and problems (part II). In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (eds.), 269–97.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. (1987). Text and context: a new approach to the study of classroom writing. Discourse Processes, 10, 4, 321–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. (1979). Rhetorical maturity: definition and development. Paper given at the Carleton Conference on Learning to Write (CCTE), Canada, May 1979.Google Scholar
Monaghan, J. (ed.) (1987). Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Monroe, J. H. (1975). Measuring and enhancing syntactic maturity in French. French Review, 6, 1023–31.Google Scholar
Morenberg, M., Daiker, D. & Kerek, A. (1978). Sentence combining at the college level: an experimental study. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 245–56.Google Scholar
Morrissey, M. D. (1979 and 1980). A rule-based description of noun-phrase errors. Moderne Sprachen, 23, 7–18 (part 1) and 24, 1–16 (part 2).Google Scholar
Morrissey, M. D. (1981). Learners' errors and linguistic description. Lingua, 54, 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosenthal, P., Tamor, L. & Walmsley, S. A. (1983). Research on writing. Principles and methods. New York and London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mulder, J. E. M., Braun, C. & Holliday, W. G. (1978). Effects of sentence-combining practice on linguistic maturity level of adult students. Adult Education, 28, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, A. E. (1990). Errors as discourse of an other. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (41st, Chicago, ILL, March 22–24, 1990).Google Scholar
Neuner, J. L. (1987). Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 1, 92–103.Google Scholar
Ney, J. W. (1966). Review of Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (Hunt, K. W.). Language Learning, 16, 130–5.Google Scholar
Nietzke, D. A. (1972). The influence of composition assignment upon grammatical structure. DAI 32: 5746–A.Google Scholar
Nold, E. W. & Freedman, S. W. (1977). An analysis of readers' responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 11, 164–74.Google Scholar
Nold, E. W. & Davis, B. E. (1980). The discourse matrix. College Composition and Communication, 31, 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M. (1979). Using readability research to investigate writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 231–42.Google Scholar
Nystrand, M. (1982). An analysis of errors in written communication. In M. Nystrand (ed.).Google Scholar
Nystrand, M. (ed.) (1982) What writers know. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Obenchain, A. (1979). Developing paragraph power through sentence combining. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (eds.).Google Scholar
O'Brien, T. (1987). Predictive items in student writing. In T. Bloor & J. Norrish (eds.), 70–84.Google Scholar
Odell, L. (1977). Measuring changes in intellectual processes as one dimension of growth in writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (eds.).Google Scholar
O'Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J. & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: a transformational analysis. NCTE Research Report No. 8. Champaign, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar
O'Hare, F. (1973). Sentence combining: improving student writing without formal grammar instruction. NCTE Committee on Research Report Series, No. 15. Urbana, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W. Jr., & Perkins, K. (1980). Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Onyeberechi, S. E. (1986). Syntactic fluency and cohesive ties in college freshmen writing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 08A.Google Scholar
Ostler, S. E. (1987). English in parallels: a comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 169–85.Google Scholar
Östman, J. O. (ed.) (1978). Cohesion and semantics. Åbo, Finland: Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation.Google Scholar
Pack, A. C. & Henrischen, L. E. (1980). Sentence combination: writing and combining standard English sentences. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 1, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paviolo, E. T. (1980). Spanish structural density score: an index to linguistic maturity. NABE Journal, 5, 1, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, K. (1980). Using objective measures of attained writing proficiency to discriminate among holistic evaluations. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perren, G. E. & Trim, J. L. M. (eds.) (1971). Application of linguistics.Google Scholar
Perron, T. D. (1976). The impact of mode on written syntactic complexity: parts I, II, III. Studies in Language Education Reports, No. 24, 25, 27. Athens: Department of Language Education, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (1989). Textual designs: signalling coherence in first and second language academic writing. PhD thesis, University of Lancaster. Now available as Notes et Documents LIMSI no. 91–1, January 1991.Google Scholar
Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (1990). Contrasting discourses: contrastive analysis and a discourse approach to writing. Language Teaching, 23, 3, 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. (1986). Getting the theme across: a study of dominant function in the academic writing of university students. In B. Couture (ed.), 169–85.Google Scholar
Piché, G. L. & Roen, D. (1987). Social cognition and writing: interpersonal cognitive complexity and abstractness and the quality of students' persuasive writing. Written Communication, 4, 68–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, L. (ed.) (1988). The structure of discourse. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Potter, R. R. (1967). Sentence structure and prose quality. Research in the Teaching of English, 1, 17–28.Google Scholar
Pringle, I. & Freedman, A. (1980). An analysis of the syntactic maturity and writing skills of grade five, eight and twelve student writers. Carleton, Canada: Report for the Carleton Board of Education.Google Scholar
Reed, W. M., Burton, J. K. & Vandett, N. M. (1986). Daly and Miller's writing apprehension test and Hunt's T-unit analyses: two measurement precautions in writing research. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
Da Rocha, F. J. (1975). On the reliability of error analysis. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, M. (1984). On major types of written errors in advanced students of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1985). Grammar and style in children's narratives. Linguistics, 23, 1, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. (1971). A transformational approach to teaching composition. College Composition and Communication, 22, 179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S., Rob, T. & Shortreed, I. (1988). First language composition pedagogy in the second language classroom: a reassessment. RELC Journal, 19, 1, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. & Piché, G. (1979). Development in syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 293–316.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. E. (1984). Description and explanation in interlanguage syntax: state of the art. Language Learning, 34, 127–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, T. (1987). Markedness theory and error evaluation: an experimental study. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3, 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of non-native speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 1, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24, 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. & Celce-Murcia, M. (1977). Some reservations concerning error analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scinto, L. F. M. (1981). The acquisition of functional composition strategies for text. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag (Papiere zur Textlinguistik Band 39).Google Scholar
Scott, M. S. & Tucker, R. G. (1974). Error analysis and English-language strategies of Arab students. Language Learning, 24, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) (1960). Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalker, J. W. & Stalker, J. C. (1988). A comparison of pragmatic accommodation of non-native and native speakers in written English. World Englishes, 7, 2, 119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. F. (1978 a). Syntactic maturity from high school to university: a first look. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 37–46.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. F. (1978 b). Freshman sentence combining: a Canadian project. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 257–68.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. F. (1978 c). Sentence combining and syntactic maturity in first year university. ED 153 240.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. F. & Grobe, C. H. (1979). Syntactic maturity, mechanics of writing, and teachers' quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 207–15.Google Scholar
Stotsky, S. (1975). Sentence-combining as a curricular activity: Its effect on written language development and reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 30–71.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. J. (1987). Negotiating expectations: writing and reading placement tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (38th, Atlanta, GA, March 19–21, 1987).Google Scholar
Tadros, A. (1985). Prediction in text. English Language Research. Birmingham: University Printing Section.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning, 29, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E., Frauenfelder, U. & Selinker, L. (1976). Systematicity/variability and stability/instability in interlanguage systems. In H. Brown (ed.), 93–134.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. (1986). Errors and explanations. Applied Linguistics, 7, 2, 144–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, R. J. & Mosenthal, J. H. (1981). The cohesion concept's relationship to the conference of text (Technical Report No. 221, Center for the Study of Reading). Champaign, ILL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Tierney, R. J. & Mosenthal, J. H. (1983). Cohesion and textual coherence. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215–30.Google Scholar
Truus, S. (1972). Sentence construction in English and Swedish in the writings of Swedish students of English at university level: a pilot study. Projektet språkfärdighet i engelska (SPRENG), Report No. 7. Göteborgs University.Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1982 a). Functional sentence perspective, composition, and reading. College Composition and Communication, 33, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1982 b). The given-new strategy of comprehension and some natural expository paragraphs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 501–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1986). Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In C. R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (eds.).Google Scholar
Véliz, M. (1988). Evaluación de la madurez sintáctica en el discurso escrito. Revista de la Lingüistica Teórica y Aplicada, 26, 105–41.Google Scholar
Vitale, M. R., King, F. J., Shontz, D. W. & Huntley, G. M. (1971). Effect of sentence-combining exercises upon several restricted written composition tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 521–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, C. (1980). The effects of maturity and discourse type on the written syntax of superior high school seniors and upper level college English majors, DAI 41: 3979–A.Google Scholar
Watson, C. (1983). Syntactic change: writing development and the rhetorical context. In M. Martlew (ed.).Google Scholar
Welyun Yang, A. (1989). Cohesive chains and writing quality. Word, 40, 1/2, 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, K. (1988). Pilot study on the nature of difficulties in written expression in a second language: process or product? Bulletin of the Canadian Association for Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 51–7.Google Scholar
White, E. M. (1985). Teaching and assessing writing. San Francisco, Washington, London: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wikborg, E. (1985). Unspecified topic in university essays. Text, 5, 4, 359–70.Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1979). Defining complexity. College English, 40, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, E. O. (1982). Towards a contextual grammar of English. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Witte, S. P. (1983 a). The reliability of mean T-unit length: some questions for research in written composition. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle & J. Yalden (eds.).Google Scholar
Witte, S. P. (1983 b). Topical structure and writing quality: some possible text-based explanations of readers' judgments of student writing. Visible Language, 17, 2, 177–205.Google Scholar
Witte, S. P. & Davis, A. S. (1980). The stability of T-unit length: a preliminary investigation. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 1, 5–17.Google Scholar
Witte, S. P. & Davis, A. S. (1982). The stability of T-unit length in the written discourse of college freshmen: a second study. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 1, 71–84.Google Scholar
Witte, S. P. & Faigley, L. L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, S. P. & Sodowsky, R. E. (1978). Syntactic maturity in the writing of college freshmen. Paper, Annual Meeting of CCCC, ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills ED 163 460.Google Scholar
Woodley, M.-P. (1983). From complex sentences to coherent discourse. Lenguas Modernas, 9/10, 37–47.Google Scholar
Woodley, M.-P. (1985). Grammaire de texte et apprentissage de l'écrit. Français dans le Monde, 192, 60–5.Google Scholar
Woodley, M.-P. (1987). Non-nativeness in second language texts: the syntax factor. In T. Bloor and J. Norrish (eds.), 130–42.Google Scholar
Yde, P. & Spoelders, M. (1985). Text cohesion: an exploratory study with beginning writers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 4, 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamel, V. (1980). Re-evaluating sentence-combining practice. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 1, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar