Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ph4cd Total loading time: 0.176 Render date: 2022-07-05T06:36:00.470Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The importance of interaction effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2003

Robert Sigley
Affiliation:
Daito Bunka University

Abstract

Published studies of linguistic variation usually concentrate on the main effects apparent for linguistic and social factor groups. By contrast, interaction effects, whereby the influence of some factor(s) is conditional on the values of other factor groups, have received considerably less attention and, even when recognized, are rarely quantified. Interaction effects involving linguistic factor groups are especially rarely acknowledged, even though the existence of interactions between social factors is widely recognized. This article reclaims interaction effects as an object of systematic variationist study and demonstrates the benefits of including such effects in quantitative modelling: first, by outlining practical methods for investigation of interaction effects within variable-rule analysis; second, by providing direct evidence for the incidence of interaction effects in linguistic data, through reanalyzing several pre-existing studies of phonological variation containing both linguistic and extralinguistic factor groups; and finally, by discussing their interpretation.This article is the result of many years of collaboration with Janet Holmes, who generously provided all of the datasets reanalyzed here. Thanks are also due to David Britain, Peter Patrick, Tom Veatch, and John Paolillo for advice and correspondence on goldvarb/varbrul at various stages over the past decade. The present version has greatly benefitted from audience feedback at the 14th New Zealand Linguistic Society Conference (Christchurch, August 2001) and from the detailed comments of the anonymous referees for LVC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Allan. (1977). The language of radio news in Auckland: A sociolinguistic study of style, audience and sub-editing variation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland.
Bickerton, Derek. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7:457492.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. (1973). On the nature of variable constraints. In Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 1322.
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245267.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Fasold, Ralph W. (1991). The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66:321.Google Scholar
Freeman, Daniel H, Jr. (1987). Applied categorical data analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Godfrey, Elizabeth, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1999). Another piece for the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11:87121.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth. (1997). Sex, speech and stereotypes: Why women use prestige speech forms more than men. Language in Society 26:4763.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 136.
Hochberg, Josef, & Tamhane, Ajit C. (1987). Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley.
Holmes, Janet. (1994). New Zealand flappers: An analysis of T voicing in New Zealand English. English World-wide 15:195224.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1995a). Time for /t/: Initial /t/ in New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15:127156.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1995b). Two for /t/: flapping and glottal stops in New Zealand English. Te Reo 38:5372.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1995c). Glottal stops in New Zealand English: An analysis of variants of word-final /t/. Linguistics 33:433463.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1996). Losing voice: Is final /z/ devoicing a feature of Maori English? World Englishes 15:193205.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1997a). Maori and Pakeha English: Some New Zealand social dialect data. Language in Society 27:65101.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1997b). Setting new standards: Sound changes and gender in New Zealand English. English World-wide 18:107142.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, & Ainsworth, Helen. (1996). Syllable-timing and Maori English. Te Reo 39:7584.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, & Bell, Allan. (1994). Consonant cluster reduction in New Zealand English. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6:5682.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Bell, Allan, & Boyce, Mary. (1991). Variation and change in New Zealand English: A social dialect investigation. Wellington: Department of Linguistics, Victoria University of Wellington.
Holmes, Janet, Vine, Bernadette, & Johnson, Gary. (1998). Guide to the Wellington Corpus of spoken New Zealand English. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
Kikai, Akio, Schleppegrell, Mary, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1987). The influence of syntactic position on relativisation strategies. In Keith Denning, Sharon Inkelas, Faye McNair-Knox, & John Rickford (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University. 266277.
Milroy, James. (1992). Language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, Lesley. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Observing and analysing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mougeon, Raymond, & Nadasdi, Terry. (1998). Sociolinguistic discontinuity in minority language communities. Language 74:4055.Google Scholar
Paolillo, John. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Patrick, Peter L. (1991). Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t,d deletion and past marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3:171189.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Pascale. (1989). A versatile program for the analysis of sociolinguistic data. In Ralph Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 395409.
Rousseau, Pascale, & Sankoff, David. (1978a). Advances in variable rule methodology. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 5769.
Rousseau, Pascale, & Sankoff, David. (1978b). A solution to the problem of grouping speakers. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 97117.
Sankoff, David. (1988). Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K. Matthier (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin: de Gruyter. 14061.
Sankoff, David, & Laberge, Suzanne. (1978). Statistical dependencies among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 119126.
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira, & Naro, Anthony J. (1991). Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather.” Language Variation and Change 3:2333.Google Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira, & Naro, Anthony J. (1992). The serial effect on internal and external variables. Language Variation and Change 4:113.Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert. (1997). Choosing your relatives: Relative clauses in New Zealand English. Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
Stevens, James. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Woods, Anthony, Fletcher, Paul, & Hughes, Arthur. (1986). Statistics in language studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The importance of interaction effects
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The importance of interaction effects
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The importance of interaction effects
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *