Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-zlj4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-01T18:26:29.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Male and female styles in 17th century correspondence: I THINK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1999

Minna Palander-Collin
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki

Abstract

When 17th century personal correspondence was studied, it was observed that women used the evidential expression I THINK more often than men. A closer analysis showed that women also used other 1st person evidential verbs as well as the 1st and 2nd person pronouns more frequently than men. This male/female difference was maintained even in different registers, although both sexes have higher frequencies of I THINK in more intimate circumstances, such as when the informants are writing to their friends or close family members. The male/female differences in frequencies are explained as a difference in the style of communication. Women's style is more “involved” and interactive: personal point of view is frequently expressed, and both the writer and the addressee are overtly included in the communication situation. Interestingly, similar differences have also been found in Present-Day English.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)