Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:33:56.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Robert Bayley
Affiliation:
The University of Texas, San Antonio

Abstract

This study examines the well-known process of consonant cluster reduction in the English of residents of a San Antonio, Texas, barrio. The study compares Tejano patterns of /-t, d/ deletion with the pan-English pattern summarized by Labov (1989). Results of VARBRUL analysis show that /-t, d/ deletion in Tejano English is constrained by many of the same factors as in other English dialects, including Los Angeles Chicano English. Results also suggest, however, a complex pattern of convergence and divergence. Younger Tejanos are converging toward other dialects of English with respect to the effect of the morphological class on cluster simplification. Yet there is some evidence that they are diverging from other dialects with respect to the effect of syllable stress. On this latter dimension, younger Tejanos replicate the pattern found by Santa Ana (1991) among Los Angeles Chicanos. Finally, the study compares /-t, d/ deletion in Tejano/Chicano English in San Antonio and Los Angeles and shows that, despite many similarities, Mexican American varieties exhibit regional as well as generational differences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baugh, John. (1983). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. (1991). Variation theory and second language learning: Linguistic and social constraints on interlanguage tense marking. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. (1993). Variation in Tejano English: Evidence for variable lexical phonology. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Variety in the South II, Auburn University, Alabama.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17:183207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1972). Tense marking in Black English. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Galindo, D. L. (1987). Linguistic influence and variation on the English of Chicano adolescents in Austin, Texas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
González, Gustavo. (1988). Chicano English. In Bixler-Marquez, Dennis J. & Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob (eds.), Chicano speech in the bilingual classroom. New York: Peter Lang. 7182.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 136.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1988). Advanced VARBRUL analysis. In Ferrara, Kathleen, Brown, Becky, Walters, Keith, & Baugh, John (eds.), Linguistic change and contact: Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference on new ways of analyzing variation. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics. 124136.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1991a). Contextual conditioning in variable phonology. Language Variation and Change 3:223239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1991b). Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3:122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R., & Boyd, Sally, (1990). The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change 2:118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartford, Beverly S. (1975). The English of Mexican-American adolescents in Gary, Indiana. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan Bybee. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:421441.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1:8598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City (Cooperative Research Report 3288). Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Ma, Roxana, & Herasimchuk, Eleanor. (1971). The linguistic dimensions of a bilingual neighborhood. In Fishman, Joshua, Cooper, Robert L., & Ma, Roxana (eds.), Bilingualism in the barrio. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 347464.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Marguerite G. (1989). The influence of Spanish phonology on the English spoken by United States Hispanics. In Bjarkman, Peter C. & Hammond, Robert M. (eds.), American Spanish pronunciation: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 215236.Google Scholar
Natalico, Diana, & Williams, Frederick. (1972). What characteristics can “experts” reliably evaluate in the speech of Black and Mexican-American children? TESOL Quarterly 6:121127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neu, Helen. (1980). Ranking of constraints on /-t, d/ deletion in American English: A statistical analysis. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 3754.Google Scholar
Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob L. (1984). Form and function in Chicano English. Rowley, MA: New-bury House.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. (1991). Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t, d deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3:171190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peñalosa, Fernando. (1980). Chicano sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Rowley, MA: New-bury House.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce, & Ornstein-Galicia, Jacob L. (1985). Chicano English: An ethnic contact dialect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, David, & Sankoff, David. (1990). Goldvarb 2.0. Program and documentation. Montreal: Centre de recherches mathématiques, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. (1994). Acquisition of variable rules: (-t, d) deletion and (ing) production in preschool children. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Otto, Santa Ana A.. (1991). Phonetic simplification processes in the English of the barrio: A cross-generational sociolinguistic study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Otto, Santa Ana A.. (1992). Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A variable rule pervades lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 4:275289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. (1974). Cours de linguistique générale. Balley, Charles & Sechehaye, Albert (eds.). Paris: Payot. (Original work published 1911)Google Scholar
Sawyer, Janet. (1970). Spanish-English bilingualism in San Antonio, Texas. In Gilbert, Glenn (ed.), Texas studies in bilingualism. Berlin: de Gruyter. 1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schecter, Sandra R. (1994). Bilingual by choice: Issues in the use of Spanish and English in family life. Paper presented to the Society for Applied Anthropology, Cancun, Quintana Roo, Mexico.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.), Language sound structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 107136Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1974). Sociolinguistic aspects of assimilation: Puerto Rican English in New York City. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar