Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a

  • Stefan Schnell (a1) and Danielle Barth (a2)

Abstract

The choice between pronominal and zero form for objects in the Oceanic language Vera'a is investigated quantitatively in texts from two registers with discourse topics of three different ontological class memberships. Discourse topicality is found to predict best the choice between pronoun and zero, outranking the factors of ontological class membership, antecedent form, and antecedent function. Contrary to current models of referent tracking, antecedent distance does not show any effect at all. It is concluded that (a) discourse structure and activation are not universally the most significant factors in referential choice and (b) ontological class and discourse topicality can be teased apart through appropriate text sampling, and it is the latter that is most significant. This bears important implications for the grammaticalization of object agreement and the typology of differential object marking.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aissen, Judith. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity versus economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3):435483.
Akaike, Hirotogu. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov, B. N. & Cáski, F. (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kaidó. 267281.
Anderson, Stephen. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ariel, Mira. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1):6587.
Ariel, Mira. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
Ariel, Mira. (2000). The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 197260.
Ariel, Mira. (2008). Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barth, Danielle, & Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. (2017). A multimodal inference approach to categorical variant choice: Construction, priming and frequency effects on the choice between full and contracted forms of am, are and is. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(2):158.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):148. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Biber, Douglas, & Conrad, Susan. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bickel, Balthasar. (2003). Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79:708736.
Bickel, Balthasar, & Nichols, Joanna. (2007). Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 169240.
Burnham, Kenneth P., & Anderson, David R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Cameron, Richard, & Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. (2004). Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context 1:4165.
Chafe, Wallace. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subjects and topics. New York: Academic Press. 2556.
Chafe, Wallace. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Chung, Sandra. (1984). Identifiability and null objects in Chamorro. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistic Society 10:116130.
Clancy, Patricia M. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese discourse. In Chafe, W. (ed.), The Pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood: ABLEX Publishing. 127202.
Comrie, Bernard. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard, Haspelmath, Martin, & Bickel, Balthasar. (2015). The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Leipzig: Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Corbett, Greville C. (2003). Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Booij, G., DeCesaris, J., Ralli, A., & Scalise, S. (eds.), Topics in morphology: Selected papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, Sep 20–22, 2001). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. 109128.
Dalrymple, Mary, & Nikolaeva, Irina. (2011). Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dowty, David. (1982). Grammatical relations and Montague grammar. In Jackson, P. & Pullum, G. K. (eds.), The nature of syntactic representation. Reidel: Dordrecht. 79130.
DuBois, John W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63:805855. doi: 10.2307/415719.
Genetti, Carol, & Crain, Laura D. (2003). Beyond preferred argument structure: Sentences, pronouns and given referents in Nepali. In Du Bois, J. W., Kumpf, L. E., & Ashby, William J. (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 197223.
Givón, Talmy. (1976). Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subjects and topics. New York: Academic Press. 149188.
Givón, Talmy. (1983a). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 141.
Givón, Talmy. (ed.) (1983b). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. (ed.) (1998). The functional approach to language. In Tomasello, M. (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 3862.
Haspelmath, Martin. (2013). Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Bakker, D. & Haspelmath, M. (eds.), Language across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 197226.
Hothorn, Torsten, Buehlmann, Peter, Dudoit, Sandrine, Molinaro, Annette, & Van Der Laan, Mark. (2006). Survival ensembles. Biostatistcs 7(3):355373.
Hothorn, Torsten, & Zeileis, Achim. (2015). partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16:39053909.
Huang, C.-T. James. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15:531574.
Huang, Yan. (1994). The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, Yan. (2000). Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iemmolo, Giorgio. (2010). Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language 34:239272.
Iemmolo, Giorgio, & Klumpp, Gerson. (2014). Introduction. In Iemmolo, G. & Klumpp, G. (eds.), Differential object marking: Theoretical and empirical issues. Special issue, Journal of Linguistics 52(2):271279.
Krifka, Manfred. (2008). Basic notion of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3–4):243276.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra. (2014). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Version 2.0-20. Package for R. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html. Accessed January 15, 2015.
Lambrecht, Knud. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lichtenberk, František. (1996). Patterns of anaphora in To'aba'ita narrative discourse. In Fox, B. (ed.), Patterns of anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 381411.
Malau, Catriona. (2016). A grammar of Vurës, Vanuatu. Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
Meyerhoff, Miriam. (2002). Formal and cultural constraints on optional objects in Bislama. Language Variation and Change 14:323346.
Neeleman, Ad, & Szendröi, Kriszta. (2007). Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4):671714.
Nichols, Joanna. (1985). The grammatical marking of theme in literary Russian. In Flier, M. S. & Brecht, R. D. (eds.), Issues in Russian morphosyntax. Columbus: Slavica Publishers. 170186.
Poplack, Shana. (1980). The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing constraints on /s/ deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 5567.
Prince, Ellen. (1981). Towards a new taxonomy of given and new. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 223255.
Prince, Ellen. (1992). The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Thomson, S. A. & Mann, W. C. (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund raising text. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 295325.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed July 20, 2015.
Rizzi, Luigi. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17:501557.
Scherre, Maria M. P., & Naro, Anthony J. (1991). Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather”. Language Variation and Change 3(1):2332.
Schnell, Stefan. (2011). A grammar of Vera'a. Kiel: Kiel University.
Schnell, Stefan. (in press). Whence subject-verb agreement? Investigating the role of topicality, accessibility, and frequency in Vera'a texts. Linguistics 56(4).
Schwenter, Scott A. (2006). Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Amaral, P. & Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 238260.
Schwenter, Scott A. (2014). Null objects across South America. In Face, T. L. & Klee, C. A. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville: Cascadila Proceedings Project. 2336.
Siewierska, Anna. (2004). Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Kneib, Thomas, Augustin, Thomas, & Zeileis, Achim. (2008). Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinfomatics 9:307. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/307. Accessed November 12, 2012.
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Zeileis, Achim, & Hothorn, Torsten. (2007). Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8:25. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/25. Accessed November 12, 2012.
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James, & Tutz, Gerhard. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4):323348.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Baayen, R. Harald. (2012). Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2):135178.
Torres Cacoullos, R. & Travis, Catherine E. (2013). Prosody, priming and particular constructions: The patterning of English first-person singular subject expression in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 63:1934.
Travis, Catherine E. (2007). Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19:101135.

Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a

  • Stefan Schnell (a1) and Danielle Barth (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed