Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T06:34:28.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, prescriptivism, and language change: Morphological variation in Hebrew animate reference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

Erez Levon
Erez Levon
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Beliefs about a language rarely correspond to how it is used. This is especially true for Hebrew, a language that has been subject to continued ideological “preservation” efforts ever since its (re)vernacularization in the early 20th century. Recently, attention has turned to the maintenance of Hebrew gender morphology, which is perceived in both scholarly and popular opinion as threatened by a process of leveling to gender syncretized forms across a range of word classes and inflectional paradigms. In this article, I investigate the extent to which sociolinguistic evidence supports this perception in cases of animate reference. I argue that while the claim of widespread gender neutralization of these forms is descriptively valid, its characterization as a change-in-progress is inaccurate. Rather, I suggest that Hebrew is already fully syncretized for gender in certain relevant morphological contexts and that the perception of an ongoing process of change reflects a prescriptive belief about how Hebrew should be, not how it actually is.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 33 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Academy of the Hebrew Language. (n.d.). How to address a group of mostly women. Available at http://hebrew-academy.huji.ac.il. Accessed on November 29, 2010. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy. (2002). Real and apparent time. In Chambers, J.K. & Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 312–332.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. (2005). In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, & Mchombo, Sam. (1986). Grammatical and anaphoric agreement. CLS 22(2):278–297.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. (1983). Hierarchies, targets and controllers: Agreement patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis. (1986). Anaphoric relations in English and French. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis. (2008). How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text and one neo-Gricean account of indexical reference. Journal of Pragmatics 40:997–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadish, Ronit. (1998). The Academy and the Hebrew-speaking publilc. Leshonenu la'Am 49(2):58–64. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne. (2008). Thyme and time are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84:474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles 23:629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. (1989). The grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. (1991). On the source of spoken Modern Hebrew: An investigation of covert syntax in ‘Lefi hataf’ by David Yellin. Leshonenu 55:107–126. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. (1994). Modern Hebrew: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gorman, Kyle. (2009). The consequences of multicollinearity among socioeconomic predictors of negative concord in Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16:66–75.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. (1963). Universals of language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2008). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effect variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 31:359–383.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. (1989). Demonstratives. In Almog, J., Perry, J. & Wettstein, H. (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 481–563.Google Scholar
Kasher, Assa. (1979). Ancient Hebrew and contemporary Hebrew: One language? Maxshavot 48:51–57. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron. (2001). Hebrew and Zionism: A discourse analytic cultural study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez. (2009). Dimensions of style: Context, politics and motivation in gay Israeli speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez. (2010). Language and the politics of sexuality: Lesbians and gays in Israel. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. (1979). Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review 88:513–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar. (2006). Gender online in Hebrew: New technology, old language. In Thüne, E. M., Leonardi, S. & Bazzanella, C. (eds.), Gender, language and new literacy. London: Continuum. 169–181.Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynell. (1988). Noun classes and agreement systems in Kru: A historical approach. In Barlow, M. & Ferguson, C. (eds.), Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions. Stanford: CSLI. 323–341.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. (2008). The role of prosody in morphological change: The case of Hebrew bound numerals. Language Variation and Change 20:41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Rebecca, & Kok, Cynthia. (1995). Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people = male hypothesis. Sex Roles 33:145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornan, Uzzi. (1948). The grammar of mouth and ear. Jerusalem: Inbal. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Parrott, Jeffrey. (2006). Distributed morphological mechanisms of pronoun-case variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12:173–187.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Dion, Nathalie. (2009). Prescription vs. praxis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language 85:557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis. (1991). Sorting out the variables in sociolinguistic theory. American Speech 66:33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestly, Tom. (1983). On “drift” in Indo-European gender systems. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11:339–363.Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit. (1995). Neutralization of gender distinctions in Modern Hebrew numerals. Language Variation and Change 7:79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendsburg, Gary. (2007). Ancient Hebrew morphology. In Kaye, A. (ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa. Vol. 1. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. 85–105.Google Scholar
Sa'ar, Amalia. (2007). Masculine talk: On the subconscious use of masculine linguistic forms among Hebrew- and Arabic-speaking women in Israel. Signs 32(2):406–429.Google Scholar
Sáenz-Badillos, Angel. (1993). A history of the Hebrew language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, Ora. (1982). Feminine formation in Modern Hebrew. Hebrew Annual Review 6:153–178.Google Scholar
Shapira, Amnon. (1991). Organizing women. Leshonenu la'Am 42(3):117–118. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert. (2003). The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change 15:227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. (1997). Agreement, default rules and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28:318–343.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard, & Shohamy, Elana. (1999). The languages of Israel: Policy, ideology and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Yishai. (2001). Gender switch in Modern Hebrew. In Hellinger, M. & Bussman, H. (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 95–188.Google Scholar