Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:35:42.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

James Milroy ,
Lesley Milroy ,
Sue Hartley  and
David Walshaw
James Milroy
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Lesley Milroy
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Sue Hartley
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
David Walshaw
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Glottalization and glottal replacement (particularly of /t/ in British English) have traditionally been assumed to be variants characteristic of male, lower-class speakers. Both phenomena have been heavily stigmatized, but are spreading rapidly. Recent studies in various parts of the British Isles (including Tyneside) have suggested that glottal replacement of /t/ is led by middle-class and/or female speakers. A fuller understanding of the nature of this linguistic change depends on treating glottalization of /p, t, k/ (a more localized Tyneside feature) and glottal replacement as independent phenomena, rather than as points on a lenition scale corresponding to a social continuum (e.g., casual to careful style). The studies of Tyneside glottalization reported here show that, while females lead in the use of glottal replacement, males prefer glottalization. This pattern is interpreted in terms of a preference of males for localized variants, whereas females lead in adopting supra-local norms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 1994 , pp. 327 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Abdel, Jawad H. (1987). Cross-dialectal variation in Arabic: Competing prestige forms. Language in Society 16:359–368.Google Scholar
Alahdal, H. (1989). Standard and prestige: A sociolinguistic study of Makkan Arabic. Doctoral thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Carr, P. (1991). Lexical properties of postlexical rules: Postlexical derived environment and the Elsewhere Condition. Lingua 85:255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, P. (1993). Phonology. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, H. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. (1992). Linguistic correlates of gender and sex. English World-Wide 13:173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. (1986). Women, men and language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cohn, A. C. (1993). Nasalization in English: Phonology or phonetics? Phonology 10:43–81.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. (1994). Acoustic profiling of glottal and glottalized variants of English voiceless stops. Paper presented at the Colloquium of British Academic Phoneticians, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
Docherty, G., Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1994). Glottalling and glottalization: Phonological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Paper presented at the Second Phonological Workshop: From Cognition to Romance, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, R. (1990). The sociolinguistics of language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, W., & Dixon, J. M. (1931). Introduction to The Scottish National Dictionary. Edinburgh: The Scottish National Dictionary Association.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1987). English plosive allophones and ambisyllabicity. Gamma 10:119–141.Google Scholar
Harris, J., & Kaye, J. (1990). A tale of two cities: London glottalling and New York City tapping. The Linguistic Review 7:251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, S. (1992). A study of the effects of sex and age on glottalization patterns in the speech of Tyneside schoolchildren. Undergraduate dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Horvath, B. (1985). Variation in Australian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jabeur, M. (1987). A sociolinguistic study in Rades, Tunisia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P., & Wright, S. (1990). The validity of phonetic transcription: Limitations of a sociolinguistic research tool. Language Variation and Change 2:255–275.Google Scholar
Kingsmore, R. (1995). Ulster-Scots speech: A sociolinguistic study. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1994). An optimality theoretic perspective on variable rules. Paper presented at NWAV-XXIII, Stanford.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. (1973). Scouse: The urban dialect of Liverpool. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. (1984). Studies in the phonology of colloquial English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
MacAllister, A. H. (1963). A year's course in speech training, 9th ed.London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (1977). Language, social class and education: A Glasgow study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (1991). Locating dialect in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mees, I. (1987). Glottal stop as a prestigious feature in Cardiff English. English World-Wide 8:25–39.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1982). Some connections between Galloway and Ulster speech. Scottish Language 1:23–27.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1992). Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1978). Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold. 19–36.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., Milroy, L., & Hartley, S. (1994). Local and supra-local change in British English: The case of glottalisation. English World-Wide 15:1–33.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1992). New perspectives in the analysis of sex differentiation in language. In Bolton, K. & Kwok, H. (eds.), Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives. London: Routledge 163–179.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. (1990). Ladylike accents: Female accents and perceptions of prestige in nineteenth century England. Notes and Queries 37:44–52.Google Scholar
Newbrook, M. (1986). Sociolinguistic reflexes of dialect interference in West Wirral. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. (1947). The phonetic system of a dialect of Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Le Maître Phonétique 87:6.Google Scholar
Reid, E. (1978). Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Arnold. 158–171.Google Scholar
Rigg, L. (1987). A quantitative study of sociolinguistic patterns of variation in adult Tyneside speakers. Undergraduate dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Roach, P. J. (1973). Glottalization of English (p), (t), (k) and /t∫/ – a re-examination. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 3:10–21.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1975). Linguistic variability in the speech of some Edinburgh schoolchildren. Master's thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Romaine, S., & Reid, E. (1976). Glottal sloppiness: A sociolinguistic view of urban speech in Scotland. Teaching English 9:3.Google Scholar
Schatz, H. (1986). Plat Amsterdams in its social context. Amsterdam: P. J. Meertens Institut voor Dialectologie, Volkskunde en Naamkunde.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syllable. In van der Hulst, H., & Smith, N. (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 337–384.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1970). A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1983). On dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1988). Norwich revisited: Recent changes in an English urban dialect. English World-Wide 9:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English (3 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1993). Identifying and interpreting variables. In Preston, D. (ed.), American dialect research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar