Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation

  • Hendrik De Smet (a1)

This paper hypothesizes that as an expression becomes more frequent in one grammatical context, its mental retrievability improves, which in turn makes it more easily available in different yet closely related (analogous) grammatical contexts. Such a mechanism can account for the progression of gradual change. The hypothesis generates two testable predictions. First, innovative constructions should be more likely to emerge if their analogical models are better entrenched. Second, an expression's retrievability can also be improved by priming, which in the short term should have a similar effect to entrenchment. These predictions are tested against the development of the noun key into an adjective (as in a very key argument). The change is gradual, starting with increased productivity of compounds with key as specifying element, leading later to debonded and clearly adjectival uses. The development of key is analyzed using data from the British Houses of Parliament. The effect of entrenchment is tested against individual variation. Next, situations are investigated where key has been primed, either by an earlier instance of key or by a collocate of key. The evidence supports the hypothesis. Innovative uses of key are favored under conditions that improve the retrievability of its more conventionalized uses.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Alexander Bergs . (2005). Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hilary Chappell . (2008). Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12:4598.

Hendrik De Smet . (2012). The course of actualization. Language 88:601633.

Philip Durrant , & Alice Doherty . (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6:125155.

Tom Güldemann . (2002). When ‘say’ is not say: The functional versatility of the Bantu quotative marker ti with special reference to Shona. In T. Güldemann & M. von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 253287.

Alice C. Harris , & Lyle Campbell . (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martin Haspelmath . (1998). Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language 22:315351.

Paul J. Hopper , & Elizabeth Closs Traugott . (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vsevolod Kapatsinski . (2009). Adversative conjunction choice in Russian (no, da, odnako): Semantic and syntactic influences on lexical selection. Language Variation and Change 21:157173.

Anthony J. Naro (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language 57:6398.

Muriël Norde . (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Peter Petré . (2012). General productivity: How become waxed and wax became a copula. Cognitive Linguistics 23:2765.

Malte Rosemeyer . (2014). Auxiliary selection in Spanish: Gradience, gradualness, and conservation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hans-Jörg Schmid , & Annette Mantlik . (2015). Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133:583623.

Roy Skousen . (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Michael Stubbs . (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative methods. Functions of Language 2:133.

Benedikt Szmrecsanyi . (2006). Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kristel Van Goethem , & Hendrik De Smet . (2014). How nouns turn into adjectives: The emergence of new adjectives in French, English and Dutch through debonding processes. Languages in Contrast 14:251277.

Turo Vartiainen . (2013). Subjectivity, indefiniteness and semantic change. English Language and Linguistics 17:157179.

E. Judith Weiner , & William Labov . (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19:2958.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Variation and Change
  • ISSN: 0954-3945
  • EISSN: 1469-8021
  • URL: /core/journals/language-variation-and-change
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 21
Total number of PDF views: 200 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 807 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.