Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T06:25:57.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

William Labov
William Labov
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Two general principles of sexual differentiation emerge from previous sociolinguistic studies: that men use a higher frequency of nonstandard forms than women in stable situations, and that women are generally the innovators in linguistic change. It is not clear whether these two tendencies can be unified, or how differences between the sexes can account for the observed patterns of linguistic change. The extensive interaction between sex and other social factors raises the issue as to whether the curvilinear social class pattern associated with linguistic change is the product of a rejection of female-dominated changes by lower-class males. Multivariate analysis of data from the Philadelphia Project on Linguistic Change and Variation indicates that sexual differentiation is independent of social class at the beginning of a change, but that interaction develops gradually as social awareness of the change increases. It is proposed that sexual differentiation of language is generated by two distinct processes: (1) for all social classes, the asymmetric context of language learning leads to an initial acceleration of female-dominated changes and retardation of male-dominated changes; (2) women lead men in the rejection of linguistic changes as they are recognized by the speech community, a differentiation that is maximal for the second highest status group.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 1990 , pp. 205 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

Abd-el-Jawad, Hassan. (1981). Phonological and social variation in Arabic in Amman. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Abd-el-Jawad, Hassan. (1987). Cross-dialectal variation in Arabic: Competing prestigious forms. Language in Society 16:359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, Orlando. (1990). Variación fonetica y diversidad social en el Español Dominicano de Santiago. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre Y Maestra. See Note Card.Google Scholar
Albo, Xavier. (1970). Social constraints on Cochabamba Quechua. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Latin American Studies Program, Dissertation Series No. 19.Google Scholar
Alturo, Nuria & Turell, Ma. Teresa. (1990). Linguistic change in El Pont de Suert: The study of variation of /3/. Language Variation and Change 2:19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anshen, Frank. (1969). Speech variation among Negroes in a small southern community. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Ash, Sharon. (1984). Variability of final consonant deletion in BEV. Paper presented at NWAVE-XIII,Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Babbitt, E. H. (1896). The English of the lower classes in New York City and vicinity. Dialect Notes 1:457–464.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Bernstein, Cynthia & Tillery, Jan. (in preparation). The configuration of sound changes in Texas.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Maynor, Natalie. (1987). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–473.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. (1982a). Cantonese sociolinguistic patterns: Correlating social characteristics of speakers with phonological variables in Hong Kong Cantonese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. (1982b). Lexical diffusion in Hong Kong Cantonese: “Five” leads the way. Paper given at the 8th Annual Berkeley Linguistic Society meeting.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. (1986). The microhistory of a sound change in progress in Hong Kong Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 14:1–41.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Bortoni-Ricardo, Stella M. (1985). The urbanization of rural dialect speakers: A sociolinguistic study in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, David & Bradley, Maya (1979). Melbourne vowels. University of Melbourne Working Papers in Linguistics, No. 5.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dédé, Gerritsen, Marinel & de Haan, Dorian. (1979). Speech differences between men and women. Language in Society 8:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callary, R. E. (1975). Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois. Language in Society 4:155–170.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. & Hardwick, Margaret F. (1985). Dialect homogeneity and incipient variation: Changes in progress in Toronto and Vancouver. In Harris, J. & Hawkins, R. (eds.), Sheffield Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 2. Sheffield: University of Sheffield School of Modern Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. (1981). Variation in the use of ain't in an urban British English dialect. Language in Society 10:365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. (1984). Sex differences in language usage: Some further observations. Paper presented at NWAVE XIII,Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. (1987). Dialect mixing and linguistic variation in a non-overtly stratified society. In Denning, et al. (1987). 74–85.Google Scholar
Cofer, Thomas. (1972). Linguistic variability in a Philadelphia speech community. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
De Camp, L. Sprague. (1933). Transcription of “The North Wind” as spoken by a Philadelphian. Le Maitre Phonétique. 50–51.Google Scholar
Denning, K.M. et al. (eds.) (1987). Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford: Stanford University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
De Paolo, Marianna. (1988). Pronunciation and categorization in sound change. In Ferrara, et al. (1988). 84–92.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1986). The roles of high school social structure in phonological change. Paper presented at the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989a). Jocks and Burnouts: Social categories and identities in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1989b). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245–268.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (ed.). (in press). New ways of analyzing sound change. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Eisikovits, Edina. (1981). Inner-Sydney English: An investigation of grammatical variation in adolescent speech. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1969). A sociolinguistic study of the pronunciation of three vowels in Detroit speech. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, K., Brown, B., Walters, K. & Baugh, J. (eds.) (1988). Linguistic change and contact: NWAV XVI. Austin: University of Texas Linguistic Forum, 30. 84–92.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14:47–56.Google Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. (1983). Sound change and social structure in a rural community. Language in Society 12:313–328.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. (1978). Peasant men can't get wives: Language change and sex roles in a bilingual community. Language in Society 7:1–17.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. (1980). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Gauchat, Louis. (1905). L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. In Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf. Halle: Map Niemeyer. 175–232.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, M. & Jansen, F. (1980). The interplay between diachronic linguistics and dialectology: Some refinements of Trudgill's formula. In Maher, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 11–37.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1984). Social class and language change. Paper presented at NWAVE-XIII,Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory, Horvath, Barbara, Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine & Rogers, Inge. (1986). An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15:23–52.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. (1944). Men's and women's speech in Koasati. Language 20:142–149.Google Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. (1987). Male/female differences in speech: An alternative interpretation. In Denning, et al. (1987). 173–182.Google Scholar
Hermann, E. (1929). Lautveränderungen in der individualsprache einer Mundart. Nachrichten der Gesellsch. der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Phl.-his. Kll. 11:195–214.Google Scholar
Hibiya, Junko. (1988). A quantitative study of Tokyo Japanese. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Hindle, Donald. (1980). The social and structural conditioning of phonetic variation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Holmquist, Jonathan C. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a Spanish village. Language in Society 14:191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmquist, Jonathan C. (1988). Language loyalty and linguistic variation: A study in Spanish Cantabria. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Horvath, B. & Sankoff, D. (1987). Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16:179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann. (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kökeritz, Helge. (1953). Shakespeare's pronunciation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. (1978). Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7:17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans & McDavid, Raven I Jr (1961). The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1965). On the mechanism of linguistic change. Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics 18:91–114.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1973). The social setting of linguistic change. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics 11: Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 195–253.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1980). The social origins of sound change. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 251–266.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in Use. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The exact description of the speech community: Short a in Philadelphia. In Fasold, R. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language change and variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 1–57.Google Scholar
Labov, William, (in press). The three dialects of English. In Eckert, (in press).Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Cooperative Research Report 3288. Vols I and II. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey (Linguistics Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania).Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yeager, Malcah & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Laferriere, Martha. (1979). Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language 55:603–617.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz. (1975). Linguistic structure and sociolinguistic conditioning in the use of verbal endings in si clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lennig, Matthew. (1978). Acoustic measurement of linguistic change: The modern Paris vowel system. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Levine, Lewis & Crockett, H. Jr (1966). Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Postvocalic r. In Lieberson, S. (ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. Sociological Inquiry 36, No. 2. 204–226.Google Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei. (1988). Consonant variation in Taiwan Mandarin. In Ferrara, et al. (1988). 200–208.Google Scholar
López, Leticia. (1983). A sociolinguistic analysis of /s/ variation in Honduran Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Luthin, Herbert W. (1987). The story of California (ow): The coming-of-age of English in California. In Denning, et al. (1987). 312–324.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. (1977). Language, social class, and education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. (1921). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: La société linguistique de Paris.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley & Margrain, Sue. (1980). Vernacular language loyalty and social network. Language in Society 9:43–70.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. (1978). Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edwin Arnold. 19–36.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. (1985). Linguistic change, social network, and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21:339–384.Google Scholar
Mock, Carol C. (1979). The social maturation of pronunciation: A family case study. The Rural Learner 1:23–37. (Southwest Missouri State University, School of Education and Psychology, Springfield).Google Scholar
Mock, Carol C. (in press). The impact of the Ozark drawl: Its role in the shift of the diphthong /ey/. In Eckert, (in press).Google Scholar
Modaressi, Yahya. (1978). A sociolinguistic investigation of modern Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Morales, Humberto Lopez. (1986). Velarization of -/N/ in Puerto Rican Spanish. In Sankoff, D. (1986). 105–113.Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond & Beniak, Edouard. (1987). The extralinguistic correlates of core lexical borrowing. In Denning, et al. (1987). 337–347.Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, Beniak, Edouard & Valli, André. (1988). VAIS, VAS, M'AS in Canadian French: A sociohistorical study. In Ferrara, et al. (1988). 250–262.Google Scholar
Nearey, Terence. (1977). Phonetic feature system for vowels. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J. Karl, (n.d.) Study of a sound change in progress. University of North Carolina, Greensboro, Interdepartmental Program in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Owens, Thompson W. & Baker, Paul M. (1984). Linguistic insecurity in Winnipeg: Validation of a Canadian Index of Insecurity. Language in Society 13:337–350.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. (1978). On dialect acquisition and communicative competence: The case of Puerto Rican bilinguals. Language in Society 7:89–104.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. (1981). Mortal phonemes as plural morphemes. In Sankoff, D. & Cedergren, H. (eds.), Variation omnibus. Alberta: Linguistic Research. 59–72.Google Scholar
Rissel, Dorothy A. (1989). Sex, attitudes, and the assibilation of /r/ among young people in San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Language Variation and Change 1:269–284.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David (ed.). (1986). Diachrony and diversity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. (1980). The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1990). The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shopen, Tim & Wald, Benji. (1982). The use of (ing) in Australian English. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger, Wolfram, Walt & Riley, William K. (1966). A study of social dialects in Detroit. (Final Report, Project 6–1347). Washington, DC: Office of Education.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. (1988). The sociolinguistic variance of low vowels in Azorean Portuguese. In Ferrara, et al. (1988). 336–344.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. (1981). Extending the sociolinguistic variable to syntax: The case of pleonastic clitics in Spanish. In Sankoff, D. & Cedergren, H. (eds.), Variation omnibus. Alberta: Linguistic Research. 335–342.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. (1986). The social profile of a syntactico-semantic variable: Three verb forms in Old Castile. In Sankoff, D. (1986). 279–292.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar. (1947). An introduction to linguistic science. New Haven: Yale University Press, Ch. 8.Google Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette. (1983). Equivalence et grammaticalisation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–195.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974a). Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3:215–246.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974b). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. Whitney. (1944). Notes on the Philadelphia dialect. American Speech 19:39–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Maria Fontanella de. (1974). Un aspecto sociolinguistico del Espanol Bonaerense: la -S en Bahia Blanca. Bahia Blanca: Cuadernos de Linguisticca.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar
Wolf, Clara & Jiménez, Elena. (1979). A sound change in progress: Devoicing of Buenos Aires /z/. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Woods, Howard. (1979). A socio-dialectology survey of the English spoken in Ottawa: A study of sociological and stylistic variation in Canadian English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil. (1936). A history of Modern Colloquial English. London: Basil Black well.Google Scholar