Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis

  • Jason Grafmiller (a1) and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (a2)

Abstract

This study explores variability in particle placement across nine varieties of English around the globe, utilizing data from the International Corpus of English and the Global Corpus of Web-based English. We introduce a quantitative approach for comparative sociolinguistics that integrates linguistic distance metrics and predictive modeling, and use these methods to examine the development of regional patterns in grammatical constraints on particle placement in World Englishes. We find a high degree of uniformity among the conditioning factors influencing particle placement in native varieties (e.g., British, Canadian, and New Zealand English), while English as a second language varieties (e.g., Indian and Singaporean English) exhibit a high degree of dissimilarity with the native varieties and with each other. We attribute the greater heterogeneity among second language varieties to the interaction between general L2 acquisition processes and the varying sociolinguistic contexts of the individual regions. We argue that the similarities in constraint effects represent compelling evidence for the existence of a shared variable grammar and variation among grammatical systems is more appropriately analyzed and interpreted as a continuum rather than multiple distinct grammars.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All

We thank Melanie Röthlisberger, Benedikt Heller, Jack Grieve, and members of the Quantitative Lexicography and Variational Linguistics research unit at KU Leuven for valuable comments and feedback. This research was supported by an Odysseus grant (principal investigator: second author) from the Research Foundation Flanders (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek—Vlaanderen, grant no. G.0C59.13N). The usual disclaimers apply.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Aldenderfer, Mark, & Blashfield, Roger. (1984). Cluster analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Bentz, Christian, & Winter, Bodo. (2013). Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1):127.
Bernaisch, Tobias, Gries, Stefan Th., & Mukherjee, Joybrato. (2014). The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1):731.
Biber, Douglas. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blais, Mary-Jane, & Gonnerman, Laura M. (2013). Explicit and implicit semantic processing of verb–particle constructions by French–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4):829846.
Bock, J. Kathryn, & Warren, Richard K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition 21(1):4767.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., & Tanaka, Mikihiro. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 118(2):172189.
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana, & Harald, Baayen. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In Boume, G., Kraemer, I. & Zwarts, J. (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science. 6994.
Bresnan, Joan, & Ford, Marilyn. (2010). Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1):168213.
Bresnan, Joan, & Hay, Jennifer. (2008). Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118(2):245259.
Browman, Catherine P. (1986). The hunting of the quark: The particle in English. Language and Speech 29(4):311334.
Bryant, D., & Moulton, Vincent. (2004). Neighbor-net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2):255265.
Bybee, Joan. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82(4):711733.
Cappelle, Bert. (2009). Contextual cues for particle placement. In Bergs, A. & Diewald, G. (eds.), Contexts and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 145192.
Culbertson, Jennifer, Smolensky, Paul, & Legendre, Géraldine. (2012). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition 122(3):306329.
Dale, Rick, & Lupyan, Gary. (2012). Understanding the origins of morphological diversity: The linguistic niche hypothesis. Advances in Complex Systems 15(03–04):1150017.
D'Arcy, Alexandra, & Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2015). Not always variable: Probing the vernacular grammar. Language Variation and Change 27(3):255285.
Davies, Mark, & Fuchs, Robert. (2015). Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide 36(1):128.
Dehé, Nicole. (2002). Particle verbs in English: Syntax, information structure, and intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deshors, Sandra C., & Gries, Stefan Th. (2016). Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes: A two-step random forests analysis of ing vs. to complements. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2):192218.
Diessel, Holger, & Tomasello, Michael. (2005). Particle placement in early child language: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1:89112.
Elenbaas, Marion. (2007). The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb-particle combination. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University.
Elenbaas, Marion. (2013). Motivations for particle verb word order in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 17(3):489511.
Fraser, Bruce. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.
Futrell, Richard, Mahowald, Kyle, & Gibson, Edward. (2015). Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(33):1033610341.
Gardner, Dee, & Davies, Mark. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly 41(2):339359.
Garretson, Gregory. (2004). Coding practices used in the project Optimality Typology of Determiner Phrases. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University. Available at: http://npcorpus.bu.edu/documentation/BUNPCorpus_coding_practices.pdf. Accessed February 22, 2017.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. (2014). The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners: A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(1):5188.
Goldberg, Adele E. (2016). Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In Nash, L. & Samvelian, P. (eds.), Approaches to complex predicates. Boston: Brill. 110141.
González, Rafael Alejo. (2010). Making sense of phrasal verbs: A cognitive linguistic account of L2 learning. AILA Review 23(1):5071.
Greenbaum, Sidney. (1996). Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gries, Stefan Th. (2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. New York: Continuum Press.
Gries, Stefan Th. (2011). Acquiring particle placement in English: A corpus-based perspective. In Medina, P. G. (ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Equinox. 236263.
Gries, Stefan Th., & Kootstra, Gerrit Jan. (2017). Structural priming within and across languages: A corpus-based perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(2):235250.
Grieve, Jack. (2016). Regional variation in written American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haddican, Bill, & Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2012). Effects on the particle verb alternation across English dialects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18:3140.
Hawkins, John A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heller, Benedikt, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, & Grafmiller, Jason. (2017). Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1):327.
Hinrichs, Lars, & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. (2007). Recent changes in the function and frequency of standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3):437474.
Hoffmann, Thomas. (2014). The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the dynamic model. In Buschfeld, S., Hoffmann, T., Huber, M., & Kautzsch, A. (eds.), Varieties of English around the world. Vol. G49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 160180.
Kachru, Braj B. (ed.). (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Labov, William. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2):344387.
Liao, Yan, & Fukuya, Yoshinori J. (2004). Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning 54(2):193226.
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John A., & Wasow, Thomas. (2004). Domain minimization in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80(2):238261.
MacDonald, Maryellen C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4:116.
MacWhinney, Brian. (1997). Second language acquisition and the competition model. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 113142.
Mukherjee, Joybrato, & Gries, Stefan Th. (2009). Collostructional nativisation in new Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide 30(1):2751.
Osselton, Noel E. (1988). Thematic genitives. In Nixon, G. & Honey, J. (eds.), An historic tongue: Studies in English linguistics in memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge.
Paolillo, John C. (2013). Individual effects in variation analysis: Model, software, and research design. Language Variation and Change 25(1):89118.
Perek, Florent, & Goldberg, Adele E. (2015). Generalizing beyond the input: The functions of the constructions matter. Journal of Memory and Language 84:108127.
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (2001). African American English in the diaspora. Malden: Blackwell.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula. (2016). Particle placement in Late Modern English and twentieth-century English: Morpho-syntactic variables. Folia Linguistica 37(1):145175.
Röthlisberger, Melanie, Grafmiller, Jason, & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. (2017). Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 28(4):673710.
Schmitt, Norbert, & Redwood, Stephen. 2011. Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. In Meunier, F., De Cock, S., Gilquin, G., & Paquot, M. (eds.), A taste for corpora: In honour of Sylviane Granger. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 173207.
Schneider, Edgar. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, Gerold, & Zipp, Lena. (2013). Discovering new verb-preposition combinations in New Englishes. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 13:online. Available at: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/82328/. Accessed June 6, 2015.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379423.
Shih, Stephanie S. (2017). Phonological influences in syntactic alternations. In Gribanova, V. & Shih, S. S. (eds.), The morphosyntax-phonology connection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 223252.
Siyanova, Anna, & Schmitt, Norbert. (2007). Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. IRAL—International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(2):119139.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette, Tagliamonte, Sali, & Todd, Simon. (2017). Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). Available at https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/10.5334/gjgl.310/. Accessed October 26, 2017.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Heller, Benedikt, & Röthlisberger, Melanie. (2016). Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2):109137.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, & Wolk, Christoph. (2011). Holistic corpus-based dialectology. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2):561592.
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2013). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, N. (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 130156.
Tamminga, Meredith, MacKenzie, Laurel, & Embick, David. (2016). The dynamics of variation in individuals. Linguistic Variation 16(2):300336.
Thim, Stefan. (2012). Phrasal verbs: The English verb-particle construction and its history. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wälchli, Bernhard. (2014). Algorithmic typology and going from known to similar unknown categories within and across languages. In Szmrecsanyi, B. & Wälchli, B. (eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech. Berlin: De Gruyter. 355393.
Wasow, Thomas. (2002). Postverbal behavior. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Wonnacott, Elizabeth. (2011). Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners. Journal of Memory and Language 65(1):114.
Zipp, Lena, & Bernaisch, Tobias. (2012). Particle verbs across first and second language varieties of English. In Hundt, M. & Gut, U. (eds.), Mapping unity and diversity world-wide: Corpus-based studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 167196.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed