Skip to main content

Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast

  • William Labov (a1), Mark Karen (a1) and Corey Miller (a1)

In 1972, Labov, Yaeger, and Steiner reported a series of “near-mergers” that have since proved to be difficult to assimilate to the standard conception of the phoneme and that challenged our current understanding of how language production is related to perception and learning (Labov, Yaeger, & Steiner, 1972). In these situations, speakers consistently reported that two classes of sounds were “the same,” yet consistently differentiated them in production. Labov (1975a) suggested that this phenomenon was the explanation for two “falsely reported mergers” in the history of English, where word classes were said to have merged and afterward separated. It appears that sound change may bring two phonemes into such close approximation that semantic contrast between them is suspended for native speakers of the dialect, without necessarily leading to merger. This article reports on further observations of near-mergers, which confirm their implications for both synchronic and diachronic issues, and presents the results of experiments that show how phonemic contrast is suspended for an entire community.

Hide All
Bailey, G. & Ross, G. (forthcoming). The evolution of a vernacular. To appear in Ihailainen, O. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on the History of Linguistics 6. London: Mouton.
Bloomfield, Leonard. (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2:153164.
Chomsky, Noam. (1964). The logical basis of linguistic theory. In Lunt, Horace G. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. London: Mouton. 9141008.
Di Paolo, Marianna. (1988). Pronunciation and categorization in sound change. In Ferrara, K. et al. (eds.), Linguistic change and contact: NWAV XVI. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics. 8492.
Di Paolo, Marianna & Faber, Alice. (1990). Phonation differences and the phonetic content of the tense-lax contrast in Utah English. Language Variation and Change 2:155204.
Fries, Charles C., & Pike, Kenneth. (1949). Co-existent phonemic systems. Language 25:2950.
Garde, Paul. (1961). Réflexions sur les différences phonétiques entre les langues slaves. Word 17:3462.
Halle, Morris. (1962). Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18:5472.
Harnad, Stevan (ed.). (1987). Categorical perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, John. (1985). Phonological variation and change: Studies in Hiberno-Irish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, Zellig. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Herold, Ruth. (1990). Mechanisms of merger: The implementation and distribution of the low back merger in Eastern Pennsylvania. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hindle, Donald. (1978). Approaches to vowel normalization in the study of natural speech. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 161172.
Hubbell, Allan F. (1962). The pronunciation of English in New York City. Consonants and vowels. New York: Columbia University Press.
Janson, Tore & Schulman, Richard. (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics 19:321336.
Jespersen, Otto. (1949). A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Part I: Sounds and spellings. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kohlberg, Lawrence. (1981). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kurath, Hans & McDavid, Raven I. Jr (1961). The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Labov, William. (1975a). On the use of the present to explain the past. In Heilmann, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists. Bologna: Il Mulino. 825851.
Labov, William. (1975b). What is a linguistic fact? Lisse: Peter de Ridder and New York: Humanities.
Labov, William. (1988). The judicial testing of linguistic theory. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Language in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 159182.
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.
Liberman, Alvin, Harris, K., Hoffman, H. & Griffith, B. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phonemic boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54:358368.
Milroy, James, & Harris, John. (1980). When is a merger not a merger? The MEAT/MATE problem in a present-day English vernacular. English World-Wide 1:199210.
Moulton, William. (1962). The sounds of English and German. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nunberg, Geoffrey. (1980). A falsely reported merger in eighteenth century English: A study of diachronic variation. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 221250.
Orton, Harold, & Dieth, Eugen. (19621967). Survey of English dialects. Leeds: E. J. Arnold & Son.
Patterson, W. H. (1880). A glossary of words in use in the counties of Antrim and Down. London: Trübner.
Peterson, Gordon E., & Barney, Harold L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. JASA 24:175184.
Pisoni, David. (1971). On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds. (Status Report on Speech Research SR-27). New Haven: Haskins Laboratories.
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voegelin, C. F., & Harris, , Zellig, S. (1951). Methods for determining intelligibility among dialects of natural languages. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 95:322329.
Wetmore, Thomas. (1959). The low-central and low-back vowels in the English of the Eastern United States (Publication of the American Dialect Society 32). University: University of Alabama Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Variation and Change
  • ISSN: 0954-3945
  • EISSN: 1469-8021
  • URL: /core/journals/language-variation-and-change
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed