Skip to main content Accessibility help

Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing

  • Erez Levon (a1) and Isabelle Buchstaller (a2)


The Interface Principle posits that morphosyntactic variation does not elicit the same kinds of perceptual reactions as phonetic variables because “members of the speech community evaluate the surface form of language but not more abstract structural features” (Labov, 1993:4). This article examines the effect of linguistic modularity on listeners' social evaluations. Our point of departure is the sociolinguistic monitor, a hypothesized cognitive mechanism that governs frequency-linked perceptual awareness (Labov, Ash, Ravindranath, Weldon, & Nagy, 2011). Results indicate that “higher level” structural variables are available to the sociolinguistic monitor. Moreover, listeners' reactions are conditioned by independent effects of region of provenance and individual cognitive style. Overall, our findings support the claim that sociolinguistic processing is influenced by a range of social and psychological constraints (Campbell-Kibler, 2011; Preston, 2010; Wagner & Hesson, 2014) while also demonstrating the need for models of sociolinguistic cognition to include patterns of grammatical variation (Meyerhoff & Walker, 2013; Walker, 2010).



Hide All
Adger, David. (2006). Combinatorial variability. Journal of Linguistics 42:503530.
Armstrong, Neil. (1997). Social and stylistic variation in spoken French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ashby, William J. (1981). The loss of the negative ‘ne’ in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language 57:674687.
Barnfield, Katie, & Buchstaller, Isabelle. (2010). Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide 31(3):252287.
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Wheelwright, Sally, Skinner, Richard, Martin, Joanne, & Clubley, Emma. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31:517.
Beal, Joan. (2010). Prescriptivism and the suppression of variation. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Eighteenth century English: Ideology and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2137.
Beal, Joan, & Corrigan, Karen. (2005). No, nay, never: Negation in Tyneside English. In Iyeiri, Y. (ed.), Aspects of English negation. Tokyo: John Benjamins. 139156.
Beal, Joan, & Corrigan, Karen. (2007). Time and Tyne: A corpus-based study of variation and change in relativization strategies in Tyneside English. In Elspass, S., Langer, N., Scharloth, J., & Vandenbussche, W. (eds.), Germanic language histories from below (1700–2000). Berlin: de Gruyter. 99114.
Beal, Joan, Burbano-Elzondo, Lourdes, & Llamas, Carmen. (2012). Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teesside. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Boberg, Charles. (2004). Real and apparent time in language change: Late adoption of changes in Montreal English. American Speech 79:250269.
Brown, Rupert, Condor, Susan, Mathews, Audrey, Wade, Gillian, & Williams, Jennifer. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occuptional Psychology 59(4):273286.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. (2009). The quantitative analysis of morphosyntactic variation: Constructing and quantifying the denominator. Linguistic Compass 3(4):10101033.
Buchstaller, Isabelle, & Corrigan, Karen. (forthcoming). Northern English morphosyntax. In Hickey, R. (ed.), Researching Northern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen, Holmberg, Anders, Honeybone, Patrick, & Maguire, Warren. (2013). T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17(1):85128.
Callier, Patrick. (2011). Social meaning in prosodic variability. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(1):4050.
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2011). The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22(3):423441.
Cargile, Aaron Castelan, & Giles, Howard. (1997). Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language and Communication 17(3):195217.
Cedergren, Henrietta, & Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2):333355.
Chambers, Jack. (2002). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cheshire, Jenny. (1987). Syntactic variation, the linguistic variable and sociolinguistic theory. Linguistics 25(2):257282.
Cheshire, Jenny. (1996). Syntactic variation and the concept of prominence. In Klemola, J., Kytö, M., & Rissanen, M. (eds.), Speech past and present: Studies in English dialectology in memory of Ossi Ihalainen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 117.
Cheshire, Jenny. (1998). Taming the vernacular: Some repercussions for the study of syntactic variation and spoken grammar. Te Reo: Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 41:627.
Cheshire, Jenny. (2005). Syntactic variation and spoken language. In Cornips, L. & Corrigan, K. (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 81106.
Cheshire, Jenny, & Milroy, James. (1993). Syntactic variation in non-standard dialects: Background issues. In Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (eds.), Real English: The grammar of English dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman. 333.
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, & Williams, Ann. (2005). Phonology, grammar and discourse in dialect convergence. In Auer, P., Hinskens, F., & Kerswill, P. (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence of dialects in contemporary societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 135167.
Childs, Claire. (2012). Verbal -s and the Northern Subject Rule: Spatial variation in linguistic and sociolinguistic constraints. In Pérez, X. A. Álvarez, Carrilho, E., & Magro, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limits and Areas in Dialectology (LimiAr), Lisbon, 2011. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa. 319344.
Childs, Claire. (2013). Verbal -s and the Northern Subject Rule: Spatial variation in linguistic and sociolinguistic constraints. In Pérez, X. A. Álvarez, Carrilho, E., & Magro, C. (eds.), Current approaches to limits and areas in dialectology. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. 311344.
Clark, Lynn, & Trousdale, Graeme. (2009). Exploring the role of token frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-fronting in east-central Scotland. English Language and Linguistics 13:3355.
Cole, Marcelle. (2008). What is the Northern Subject Rule? The resilience of a medieval constraint in Tyneside English. Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval Language and Literature (SELIM) 15:91114.
Cornips, Leonie, & Corrigan, Karen. (eds). (2005). Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Coupland, Nikolas, & Bishop, Hywel. (2007). Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(1):7493.
Coveney, Aidan. (1996). Variability in spoken French: A sociolinguistic study of interrogation and negation. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
Coveney, Aidan. (2005). Subject doubling in spoken French. French Review, American Association of Teachers of French 79(1):96111.
de Haas, Nynke. (2011). Morphosyntactic variation in Northern English: The Northern Subject Rule, its origins and early history. PhD dissertation, Radboud Univeristeit Nijmegen.
Detges, Ulrich, & Waltereit, Richard. (2008). Syntactic change from within and from without syntax: A usage-based analysis. In Detges, U. & Waltereit, R. (eds.), The paradox of grammatical change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1330.
Diewald, Gabriele, Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena, & Wischer, Ilse. (2013). Comparative studies in early Germanic languages: With a focus on verbal categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Docherty, Gerard, & Foulkes, Paul. (2000). Speaker, speech and knowledge of sounds. In Burton-Roberts, N., Carr, P., & Docherty, G. (eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105129.
Dorling, Danny. (2012). Inequality constitutes a particular place. Social and Cultural Geography 13(1):19.
Filppula, Marku. (1999). The grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian style. London: Routledge.
Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette, & Stein, Dieter. (2000). Pathways of change grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frith, Uta. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
Giles, Howard, & Powesland, Peter Francis. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
Godfrey, Elizabeth, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1999). Another piece for the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11(1):87121.
Gordon, Matthew. (2000). Phonological correlates of ethnic identity: Evidence of divergence? American Speech 75(2):115136.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharaski, Ron. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions. Language 69(2):274307.
Henriksen, Nicholas. (2013). Style, prosodic variation, and the social meaning of intonation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43(2):153193.
Henry, Alison. (1995). Belfast English and Standard English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hinskens, Frans. (1998). Variation studies in dialectology and three types of sound change. Sociolinguistica 12:155193.
Hoffman, Sebastian. (2004). Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data—and the importance of intuitions. In Lindquist, H. & Mair, C. (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 171210.
Hopper, Paul, & Traugott, Elizabeth. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, Richard. (1996). Sociolinguistics. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hurley, Robert, Losh, Molly, Parlier, Morgan, Reznick, J. Steven, & Piven, Joseph. (2007). The broad autism phenotype questionnaire. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 37(9):16791690.
Jensen, Marie Møller. (2014). Salience in language change: A socio-cognitive study of Tyneside English. PhD dissertation, Northumbria University Newcastle.
Johnstone, Barbara, & Kiesling, Scott F. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1):533.
Kallen, Jeffrey L. (1991). Intra-language transfer and plural subject concord in Irish and Appalachian English. Teanga 11:2034.
Kerswill, Paul. (2003). Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In Britain, D. & Cheshire, J. (eds.), Social dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 223243.
Kerswill, Paul, & Williams, Ann. (2002). ‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In Jones, M. C. & Esch, E. (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 81110.
Kroch, Anthony. (1994). Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals, K., Denton, J., Knippen, R., Melnar, L., Suzuki, H., & Zeinfeld, E. (eds.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on Variation and Linguistic Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 180201.
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William. (1978). Where does the linguistic variable stop? A response to Beatriz Lavandera. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 44. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Lab.
Labov, William. (1993). The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at the 22nd New Ways in Analyzing Variation conference, University of Ottawa, October 22–25.
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, & Nagy, Naomi. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4):431463.
Levon, Erez, & Fox, Sue. (2014). Salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42(3):185217.
McCafferty, Kevin. (2003). The Northern Subject Rule in Ulster: How Scots? How English? Language Variation and Change 15(1):105139.
McCafferty, Kevin. (2004). “[T]hunder storms is very dangese in this countrey they come in less than a minnits notice”: The Northern Subject Rule in Southern Irish English. English World-Wide 25(1):5179.
McIntosh, Angus. (1983). Present indicative plural forms in the later Middle English of the North Midlands. In Gray, D. & Stanley, E. G. (eds.), Middle English studies: Presented to Norman Davis in honour of his seventieth birthday. Oxford: Clarendon. 235254.
Meyerhoff, Miriam. (1997). Be I no gat. Constraints on Null Subjects in Bislama. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Meyerhoff, Miriam. (1999). Towards a typology of linguistic variables. Paper presented at 28th New Ways in Analyzing Variation conference, University of York and University of Toronto, October 14–17.
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Walker, James. (2013). An existential problem: The sociolinguistic monitor and variation in existential constructions on Bequia (St. Vincent and the Grenadines). Language in Society 42:407428.
Milroy, Lesley, & Gordon, Matthew. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Montgomery, Michael. (1989). Exploring the roots of Appalachian English. English World-Wide 10(2):227278.
Montgomery, Michael. (1994). The evolution of the verb concord in Scots. In Fenton, A. & McDonald, D. (eds.), Studies in Scots and Gaelic: Proceedings of the Third International Conferences on the Languages of Scotland. Edinburgh: Canongate. 8195.
Montgomery, Michael, & Fuller, Janet. (1996). What was verbal -s in 19th century African American English In Schneider, E. W. (ed.), Focus on the USA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211230.
Montgomery, Michael, Fuller, Janet, & DeMarse, Sharon. (1993). ‘The Black Men has wives and sweethearts (and third person plural -s) jest like the white men’: Evidence for verbal –s from the written documents on 19th century African American speech. Language Variation and Change 5:335357.
Moore, Emma. (2004). Sociolinguistic style: A multidimensional resource for shared identity creation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique 49(3/4):375396.
Moore, Emma, & Snell, Julia. (2011). “Oh, they're top, them”: Right dislocated tags and interactional stance. In Gregersen, F., Parrott, J., & Quist, P. (eds.) Language variation—European perspectives III. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97110.
Mossé, Fernand. (1952). A handbook of Middle English. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mottron, Laurent, Burack, Jacob, Iarocci, Grace, Belleville, Sylvie, & Enns, James. (2003). Locally oriented perception with intact global processing among adolescents with high-functioning autism: Evidence from multiple paradigms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 44(6):904913.
Murray, James A. H. (1873). The dialect of the southern counties of Scotland: Its pronunciation, grammar, and historical relations. London: Philological Society.
Nadasdi, Terry. (1995). Variation morphosyntaxique et langue minoritaire: Le cas du français ontarien. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Naro, Anthony. (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language 57(1):6398.
Nevalainen, Terttu. (2006). Corpora, historical sociolinguistics and the transmission of language change. In Hornero, A. M., Luzón, M. J., & Murillo, S. (eds.), Corpus linguistics: Applications for the study of English. Linguistic Insights 25. Bern: Peter Lang. 2337.
Niedzielski, Nancy. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Social Psychology (Special Edition) 18(1):6285.
Niedzielski, Nancy, & Preston, Dennis R. (2003). Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
O'Brien, Robert M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41:673690.
Pietsch, Lukas. (2005). ‘Some do and some doesn't’: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles. In Kortmann, B., Herrmann, T., Pietsch, L., & Wagner, S. (eds.), A comparative grammar of British English dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton. 125209.
Podesva, Robert. (2011). Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39(3):233264.
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1989). There's no tense like the present: Verbal –s inflection in early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1(1):4784.
Preston, Dennis. (2010). Variation in language regard. In Zeigler, E., Gilles, P., & Scharloth, J. (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation (für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 727.
Preston, Dennis. (2011). The power of language regard: Discrimination, classification, comprehension and production. Dialectologia Special issue II:933.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL:
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. (2005). The diffusion of subject YOU: A case study in historical sociolinguistics. Language Variation and Change 17(1):5573.
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, & Nevalainen, Terttu. (1994). Social conditioning and diachronic language change. In Kastovsky, D. (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Topics in English Linguistics 13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 325338.
Roberts, Nicholas. (2014). A sociolinguistic study of grammatical variation in Martinique French. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.
Romaine, Suzanne. (1979). The language of Edinburgh schoolchildren: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Scottish Literary Journal 9:5561.
Romaine, Suzanne. (1984). On the problem of syntactic variation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18:409439.
Rupp, Laura. (2006). The scope of the Northern Subject Rule. In Vliegen, M. (ed.), Variation in linguistic theory and language acquisition (Proceedings of the 39th Linguistics Colloquium). Oxford: Peter Lang. 295304.
Rydén, Mats. (1991). The be/have variation with intransitives in its crucial phases. In Kastovsky, D. (ed.), Historical English syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 343354.
Sankoff, Gillian. (1972). Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In Bailey, C. J. & Shuy, R. (eds.), New ways in analyzing variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 4262.
Schleef, Erik, & Ramsammy, Michael. (2013). Labio-dental fronting of /θ/ in London and Edinburgh: A cross-dialectal study. Journal of English Linguistics 17(1):2554.
Silverstein, Michael. (1981). The limits of awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper 84. Austin: Southwestern Educational Laboratory.
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Fortune, Liane. (2007). “Mam, my trousers is fa'indoon!”: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1):6399.
Stuart-Smith, Jane, & Timmins, Claire. (2006). “Tell her to shut her moof”: The role of the lexicon in TH-fronting in Glaswegian. In Caie, G., Hough, C., & Wotherspoon, I. (eds.), The power of words: Essays in lexicography, lexicology and semantics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 171183.
Tagliamonte, Sali, & Hudson, Rachel. (1999). Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(2):147172.
Tomlin, Russel S. (1995). Focal attention, voice, and word order: An experimental, cross-linguistic study. In Noonan, M. & Downing, P. (eds.), Word order in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 517554.
Tomlin, Russel S. (1997). Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: The role of attention in grammar. In Nyuts, J. & Pederson, E. (eds.), Language and conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 162189.
Tortora, Christina, & den Dikken, Marcel. (2010). Subject agreement variation: Support for the configurational approach. Lingua 120:10891108.
Traugott, Elizabeth. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 245271.
Traugott, Elizabeth. (2010). Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Davidse, K., Vandelanotte, L., & Cuyckens, H. (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 2970.
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trudgill, Peter. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, & Hesson, Ashley. (2014). Individual sensitivity to the frequency of socially meaningful linguistic cues affects language attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33(6):651666.
Wales, Katie. (2006). Northern English: A social and cultural history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, James. (2010). Variation in linguistic systems. London: Routledge.
Watt, Dominic, & Milroy, Lesley. (1999). Variation in three Tyneside vowels: Is this dialect levelling In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 2546.
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press. 95188.
Williams, Ann, & Kerswill, Paul. (1999). Dialect levelling: Change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 141162.
Winford, Donald. (1984). The linguistic variable and syntactic variation in Creole Continua. Lingua 62:267288.
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). Linguistic correlates of social differences in the Negro Community. In Alatis, J. (ed.), Georgetown monograph series on languages and linguistics no. 22. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 249257.
Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Yu, Alan. (2010). Perceptual compensation is correlated with individuals’ “autistic” traits: Implications for models of sound change. PLoS One 5(8): e11950.
Yu, Alan, Abrego-Collier, Carissa, & Sonderegger, Morgan. (2013). Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality, and ‘autistic’ traits. PLoS One 8(9):e74746.
Zanuttini, Raffaella, & Bernstein, Judy. (2011). Micro-comparative syntax in English verbal agreement. In Lima, S., Mullin, K., & Smith, B. (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 39. Vol. 2. Amherst: University of Massachusetts GLSA Publications. 839854.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing

  • Erez Levon (a1) and Isabelle Buchstaller (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.