Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Socially-mediated syntactic alignment

  • Kodi Weatherholtz (a1), Kathryn Campbell-Kibler (a1) and T. Florian Jaeger (a2)
Abstract

When we interact with one another, we tend to align our behaviors, including the way we talk. Psycholinguistic work has conceptualized alignment as the result of automatic cognitive mechanisms that operate to facilitate processing and communication. Sociolinguistic work has focused on the role of social identity and interactional strategy in explaining linguistic alignment. We draw on these two largely distinct traditions to investigate socially mediated syntactic alignment with the goal of understanding how social perception and cognition influence the mechanisms involved in alignment. A novel web-based paradigm was employed to collect speech data from a large socially heterogeneous sample. Participants listened to one of three speakers, each with a different accent, deliver an ideologically charged diatribe. Participants then completed a picture description task to assess the degree of syntactic alignment. Finally, participants completed a comprehensive social questionnaire designed to assess a wide range of social dimensions, which were tested as predictors of alignment. Our results suggest that syntactic alignment is to some extent automatic, but socially mediated. We found an overall alignment effect across social conditions and independent of social perceptions. However, the degree of alignment was influenced by a number of factors, including the perceived standardness of the passage speaker's accent, participants' perceived similarity to the speaker, and participants' preference for compromise as a conflict management style. These findings are discussed in terms of theories of linguistic alignment and speech production.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abrego-Collier, Carissa, Grove, Julian, Sonderegger, Morgan, & Yu, Alan C. L. (2011). Effects of speaker evaluation on phonetic convergence. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences XVII. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Phonetics Laboratory, Department of Chinese, Translation, and Linguistics. 192195.
Arnold, Jennifer E., Wasow, Thomas, Losongco, Anthony, & Ginstrom, Ryan. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of complexity and information structure on constituent ordering. Language 76:2855.
Babel, Molly. (2010). Dialect convergence and divergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39:437456.
Balcetis, Emily E., & Dale, Rick. (2005). An exploration of social modulation of syntactic priming. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 184189.
Ball, Peter, Giles, Howard, Byrne, Jane L., & Berechree, Philip. (1984). Situational constraints on the evaluative significance of speech accommodation: Some Australian data. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:115129.
Bandalos, Deborah L., & Boehm-Kaufman, Meggan R. (2008). Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis. In Lance, C. E. & Vandenberg, R. J. (eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis. 6187.
Bargh, John A., & Chartrand, Tanya L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 54:462479.
Bernolet, Sarah, Hartsuiker, Robert J., & Pickering, Martin J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 33(5):931949.
Bishop, George D. (1979). Perceived similarity in interracial attitudes and behaviors: The effects of belief and dialect style. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 9(5):446465.
Bock, J. Kathryn. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18:335387.
Bock, J. Kathryn, & Griffin, Zenzi M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129:177192.
Bourhis, Richard Y., & Giles, Howard. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press. 119136.
Bourhis, Richard Y., Giles, Howard, Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, & Tajfel, Henri. (1979). Psycholinguistic distinctiveness: Language divergence in Belgium. In Giles, H. & St. Clair, R. N. (eds.), Language and social psychology. Baltimore: University Park Press. 158185.
Bradlow, Ann R., & Bent, Tessa. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 106(2):707729.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., & Cleland, Alexandra A. (2000). Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75:B13B25.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., McLean, Janet F., & Cleland, Alexandra A. (2007). Participant role and syntactic alignment in dialogue. Cognition 104:163197.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., Pearson, Jamie, McLean, Janet F., & Brown, Ash. (2011). The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers. Cognition 121(1):4157.
Brennan, Susan E., & Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22(6):14821493.
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana, & Baayen, Harald R. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In Bourne, G., Kramer, I., & Zwarts, J. (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences. 6994.
Buz, Esteban, Jaeger, T. Florian, & Tanenhaus, Michael K. (2014). Contextual confusability leads to targeted hyperarticulation. In Bello, P., Guarini, M., McShane, M., and Scassellati, B. (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci14). Austin: Cognitive Science Society. 19701975.
Chang, Franklin, Dell, Gary, & Bock, J. Kathryn. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113:234272.
Chartrand, Tanya L., & Bargh, John A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:893910.
Clarke, Constance, & Garrett, Merrill F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116:36473658.
Cook, Susan W., Jaeger, T. Florian, & Tanenhaus, Michael K. (2009). Producing less preferred structures: More gestures, less fluency. In Taatgen, N. A. & van Rign, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci09). Austin: Cognitive Science Society. 6267.
De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Evers, Arne, Beersma, Bianca, Kluwer, Esther S., & Nauta, Aukje. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22:645668.
Dell, Gary. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93:283321.
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Grimm, Scott, Arnon, Inbal, Kirby, Susannah, & Bresnan, Joan. (2013). A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(1):2561.
Dijksterhuis, Ap, & Bargh, John A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press. 140.
DiStefano, Christine, Zhu, Min, & Mîndrila, Diana. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14(20):111.
Djalali, Alex, Clausen, David, Lauer, Sven, Schultz, Karl, & Potts, Christopher. (2011). Modeling expert effects and common ground using Question Under Discussion. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Building Representations of Common Ground with Intelligent Agents. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. 1015.
Doise, Willem, Sinclair, Anne, & Bourhis, Richard Y. (1976). Evaluation of accent convergence and divergence in cooperative and competitive intergroup situations. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15:247252.
Duran, Nick D., & Dale, Rick. (2011a). Creating illusory social connectivity in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Presentation at the Workshop on Crowdsourcing Technologies for Language and Cognition Studies, Boulder, Colorado, July 27, 2011.
Duran, Nick D., & Dale, Rick. (2011b). Spatial cognition adapts to social context. In Carson, L., Hölscher, C., & Shipley, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. Boston: Cognitive Science Society. 11111116.
Ferreira, Victor, Bock, J. Kathryn, Wilson, Michael, & Cohen, Neal J. (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science 19:940946.
Franklin, Scott B., Gibson, David J., Robertson, Philip A., Pohlmann, John T., & Fralish, James S. (1995). Parallel analysis: A method for determining significant principal components. Journal of Vegetation Science 6:99106.
Garner, Thurmon, & Rubin, Donald L. (1986). Middle-class Black's perceptions of dialect and style shifting: The case of Southern attorneys. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7:3348.
Garrod, Simon, & Anderson, Anthony. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27:181218.
Giles, Howard, & Powesland, Peter. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
Gries, Stefan T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34:365399.
Harrell, Frank E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer.
Hartsuiker, Robert J., & Kolk, Herman H. J. (1998). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language 62:221254.
Hoover, Mary R. (1978). Community attitudes toward Black English. Language in Society 7:6587.
Ivanova, Iva, Lane, Liane W., Gollan, Tamar, & Ferreira, Victor. (2013). The (un)automaticity of Structural Alignment. Presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Aix-en-Provence, France, September 2–4, 2013.
Jaeger, T. Florian. (2006). Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
Jaeger, T. Florian. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59:434446.
Jaeger, T. Florian. (2011). Corpus-based research on language production: Information density and reducible subject relatives. In Bender, E. M. & Arnold, J. E. (eds.), Language from a cognitive perspective: Grammar, usage, and processing. Studies in honor of Tom Wasow. Standford: CSLI Publications. 161197.
Jaeger, T. Florian, & Snider, Neal E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127(1):5783.
Johnson, Daniel E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1):359383.
Kahneman, Daniel. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kaschak, Michael P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition 35:925937.
Krauss, Robert M., & Pardo, Jennifer S. (2004). Is alignment always the results of automatic priming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):203204.
Kruschke, John K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review 99(1):2244.
Kruschke, John K. (2011). Models of attentional learning. In Pothos, E. M. & Wills, A. J. (eds.), Formal approaches in categorization. New York: Cambridge University Press. 120152.
Loebell, Helga, & Bock, J. Kathryn. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics 41:791824.
Mason, Winter, & Suri, Siddharth. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research Methods 44:123.
Mattys, Sven L., Davis, Matthew H., Bradlow, Ann R., & Scott, Sophie K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes 27:953978.
McGraw, Ian, Gruenstein, Alexander, Varenhorst, Christopher, & Sutherland, Andrew. (2012). WAMI (version 2.0). Retrieved from http://wami.csail.mit.edu/docs.php. Accessed February 1, 2012.
Monin, Benolt. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(6):10351048.
Murphy, Sheila T., Monahan, Jennifer L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:589602.
Nisbett, Richard E., & Wilson, Timothy D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alternation of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35(4):250256.
Pickering, Martin, & Branigan, Holly. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic persistence in written language production. Journal of Memory & Language 39:633651.
Pickering, Martin, & Garrod, Simon. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169226.
Rahman, Jacquelyn. (2008). Middle-class African Americans: Reactions and attitudes toward African American English. American Speech 83(2):141176.
Reitter, David, Hockenmaier, Julia, & Keller, Frank. (2006). Priming effects in combinatory categorical grammar. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Sydney, Australia. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 308316.
Reitter, David, Keller, Frank, & Moore, Johanna D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science 35:587–537.
Salamoura, Angeliki, & Williams, John N. (2007). Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual mental lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics 28:627660.
Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D., & Simonsohn, Uri. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11):13591366.
Slevc, L. Robert. (2011). Saying what's on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(6):15031514.
Smith, Bruce L., Brown, Bruce L., Strong, William J., & Rencher, Alvin C. (1975). Effects of speech rate on personality perception. Language and Speech 18(2):145152.
Snider, Neal E. (2008). An exemplar model of syntactic priming. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2012). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tamminga, Meredith. (2014). Persistence in the production of linguistic variation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Thomas, Kenneth W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13:265274.
Van de Vliert, Evert. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behavior. London: Psychology Press.
Weiner, E. Judith, & Labov, William. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19:2958.
Zahn, Christopher J., & Hopper, Robert. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4:113123.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35(2):151175.
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10(6):224228.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Variation and Change
  • ISSN: 0954-3945
  • EISSN: 1469-8021
  • URL: /core/journals/language-variation-and-change
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Weatherholtz Supplementary Material
Appendix

 PDF (48 KB)
48 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed