Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation

  • Penelope Eckert (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Speaker's sex has emerged as one of the most important social factors in the quantitative study of phonological variation. However, sex does not have a uniform effect on variables or even on variables that represent sound change in progress. This is because sex is not directly related to linguistic behavior but reflects complex social practice. The correlations of sex with linguistic variables are only a reflection of the effects on linguistic behavior of gender — the complex social construction of sex — and it is in this construction that one must seek explanations for such correlations. Sociolinguists generally treat sex in terms of oppositional categories (male/female), and the effects of sex on variation are generally sought in linguistic differences between male and female speakers. However, because gender differences involve differences in orientation to other social categories, the effects of gender on linguistic behavior can show up in differences within sex groupings. Data on sound changes in progress (the Northern Cities Chain Shift) among Detroit area adolescents show that gender has a variety of effects on variables and that the significance of gender in variation cannot be reduced to notions of male or female speech as “more or less conservative.”

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Baroni Maria Rosa & d'Urso Valentina. (1984). Some experimental findings about the question of politeness and women's speech. Language in Society 13:6772.
Bourdieu Pierre & Boltanski Luc. (1975). Le fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 4:232.
Brown Penelope. (1980). How and why women are more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In McConnell-Ginet Sally, Borker Ruth A. & Furman Nelly (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 111136.
Brown Penelope & Levinson Steven. (1979). Social structure, groups and interaction. In Scherer R. Klaus & Giles Howard (eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 291341.
Brown Penelope & Levinson Steven. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cedergren Henrietta. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Clermont Jean & Cedergren Henrietta. (1978). Les “R” de ma mère sont perdus dans l'air. In Thibault Pierrette (ed.), Le français parlé: études sociolinguistiques. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research. 1328.
Deuchar Margaret. (1988). A pragmatic account of women's use of standard speech. In Coates Jennifer & Cameron Deborah (eds.), Women in their speech communities. London: Longman. 2732.
Eckert Penelope. (1984). Age and linguistic change. In Keith Jennie & Kertzer David I (eds.), Age and anthropological theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 219233.
Eckert Penelope. (1987). The relative values of variables. In Denning Keith, Inkelas Sharon, McNair-Knox Faye & Rickford John (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV. Stanford, Department of Linguistics. 101110.
Eckert Penelope. (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17:183207.
Eckert Penelope. (1989a) Jocks and burnouts. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eckert Penelope. (1989b). Social membership and linguistic variation. Paper presented at NWAVE,Duke University.
Eckert Penelope. (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent “girl talk.” Discourse Processes 13:91122.
Eckert Penelope, Edwards Alison & Robins Lynne. (1985). Social and biological categories in the study of linguistic variation. Paper presented at NWAVE IV,Washington, DC.
Elshtain Jean Bethke. (1981). Public man, private woman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fox-Genovese Elizabeth. (1988). Within the plantation household. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Gauchat L. (1905). L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. In Festshrift Heinrich Morf. Halle: Max Niemeyer. 175232.
Guy G., Horvath B., Vonwiller J., Daisley E. & Rogers I. (1986). An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15:2352.
Haeri Niloofar. (1989). Synchronic variation in Cairene Arabic: The case of palatalization. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting,Washington, DC.
Hindle Donald. (1979). The social and situational conditioning of phonetic variation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Horvath Barbara & Sankoff David. (1987). Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16:179204.
Labov William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov William. (1972a). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In Labov William (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 122142.
Labov William. (1972b). The linguistic consequences of being a lame. In Labov William (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 255292.
Labov William. (1972c). The social motivation of a sound change. In Labov William (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 142.
Labov William. (1980). The social origins of sound change. In Labov William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 251265.
Labov William. (1984). The intersection of sex and social factors in the course of language change. Paper presented at NWAVE,Philadelphia.
Labov W., Yaeger M. & Steiner R. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Report on NSF project No. 65–3287.
Laferriere Martha. (1979). Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language 55:603617.
Macaulay R. K. S. (1977). Language, social class, and education. Edinburgh: University Press.
Maltz Daniel & Borker Ruth. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In Gumperz John J. (ed.), Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 195216.
Milroy Lesley. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Nichols Patricia C. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural south. In Thorne Barrie, Kramarae Cheris and Henley Nancy (eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 5468.
Rickford John. (1986). The need for new approaches to class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language and communication 6:215221.
Sacks Karen. (1974). Engels revisited. In Rosaldo M. & Lamphere L. (eds.), Women, culture and society. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 207222.
Sankoff David & Laberge Suzanne. (1978). The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In Sankoff David (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 239250.
Sattel Jack W. (1983). Men, inexpressiveness, and power. In Thorne Barrie, Kramarae Cheris & Henley Nancy (eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 119124.
Thibault Pierrette. (1983). Equivalence et grammaticalisation. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Montréal.
Trudgill Peter. (1972a). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179195.
Trudgill Peter. (1972b). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Veblen Thorstein. (1931). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Viking.
Wolfram W. A. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Variation and Change
  • ISSN: 0954-3945
  • EISSN: 1469-8021
  • URL: /core/journals/language-variation-and-change
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 1336 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2860 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.