Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-665pl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T08:34:08.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case in Tiers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Moira Yip ,
Joan Maling  and
Ray Jackendoff
Moira Yip
Affiliation:
Brandeis University
Joan Maling
Affiliation:
Brandeis University
Ray Jackendoff
Affiliation:
Brandeis University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a theory of surface case which bears a strong formal similarity to autosegmental theory in phonology and morphology. We suggest that surface case forms a tier which is autonomous of phrase structure—and which is associated with NP's of the PS tier by general principles analogous to those which associate tones with segments, or phonemic melodies with CV skeleta. We show that this theory permits parameterization of a variety of case systems, and thus provides some insight into how case might be characterized in Universal Grammar. The theory permits, most strikingly, a unification of Accusative and Ergative systems under one simple parameter, and explanation of the mysterious appearance of postverbal nominative case in the passives of certain Icelandic ditransitive verbs.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 217 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This work was partly supported by National Science Foundation grant IST-8420073. We would like to thank a number of people for their help with this paper, including Kristján Árnason, Jane Grimshaw, Junko Ito, Beth Levin, K. P. Mohanan, David Nash, Henk van Riemsdijk, Halldór Á. Sigurðsson, Jane Simpson, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. The authors maintain that all remaining errors are the fault of each other.

References

Andrews, Avery. 1976. The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS VI (Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics, 6), 1–22.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery. 1982. The representation of case in Modern Icelandic. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. by Bresnan, Joan, 427–503. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard. 1986. Case, prequantifiers and discontinuous agreement in Russian. To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernódusson, Helgi. 1982. Opersónulegar setningar i íslensku. [Impersonal sentences in Icelandic] University of Iceland Cand. Mag. thesis.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case-marking in Australian languages. (Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Linguistics series, 23.) Canberra.Google Scholar
BòĐvarsson, Árni. 1979. Íslensk orÐabók. Reykjavík: Bókaútgáfa MenningarsjóÐs.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries. MIT dissertation. [Revised as: Italian syntax, a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986.]Google Scholar
Carrier-Duncan, Jill. 1985. Linking of thematic roles in derivational word formation. LI 16. 1–34.Google Scholar
Carter, Richard J. 1977. Some linking regularities. (Recherches Linguistiques, 3–4.) Paris: Université de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N., and Keyser, S. J. 1983. CV Phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut. 1982. Case theory and the dative construction. Linguistic Review 2. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. R. D. 1985. Kayardild: The language of the Bentinck Islanders of North West Queensland. Doctoral thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. MIT dissertation. [Published, New York: Garland, 1979.]Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane, and Mester, Ralf-Armin. 1987. Light verbs and theta-marking. LI, to appear.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór. 1982. Urn méranir: Drög aÐ samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun. [On using mer. An attempt at a synchronic and diachronic study.] Íslenskt Mál og Almenn MálfræÐi 4. 159–90.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1980. Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1:1.83–105.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1986. Inalterability in CV Phonology. Lg. 62.321–53.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1985. Case and word order in Icelandic and Swedish. Academy of Finland, ms; paper presented to GLOW, April 1985.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1982. Isländische Grammatik. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1983. On the nature of ergativity. MIT dissertation (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science).Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1981. A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. LI 12. 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1985. Dissecting the skeleton. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ms.Google Scholar
Magnússon, FriĐrik. 1984. Urn innri gerÐ nafnliÐa í íslensku. [On the internal structure of noun phrases in Icelandic] Íslenskt Mál og Almenn MálfræÐi 6. 81–112.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1985. List of ditransitive verbs in Modern Icelandic. Brandeis University, ms.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. LI 13. 435–82.Google Scholar
Ostler, Nicholas. 1979. Case-linking: A theory of case and verb diathesis applied to Classical Sanskrit. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1982. Locality principles in syntax and phonology. Linguistics in the morning calm, 693–708. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1985. Autolexical syntax: A proposal for the treatment of noun incorporation and similar phenomena. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3. 379–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SigurĐsson, Halldór Á. 1986. Control and the Icelandic passive. Paper presented at the Third Annual Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1982. Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. þáufallssýki. [Dative sickness.] Íslenskt Mál og Almenn MálfræÐi 4. 19–62.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On complementation in Icelandic. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21. 385–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, Anne. 1985. Icelandic case without primitive grammatical functions. (Working papers in Scandinavian syntax, 24.) Trondheim: University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1986. The distribution of empty nodes in Navajo: A mapping approach. LI 17. 301–30.Google Scholar
Wordick, F. J. F. 1980. The Yindjibarndi language. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, ms.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1982. Reduplication and CV skeleta in Chinese secret languages. LI 13. 637–61.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, and Maling, Joan. 1984. Unaccusative, passive and quirky case. Proceedings of the 3rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, ed. by Westcoat, Michael et al., 317–29.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3. 441–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoëga, G. T. 1957. Íslensk-ensk orÐabók. 3rd edn. Reykjavik: Bókaverzlun SigurÐar Kristjánssonar.Google Scholar