Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T05:54:03.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some arguments against ordered rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Twila Lehmann*
Affiliation:
Indiana University

Abstract

In line with recent claims, it is argued here that no rules in a transformational grammar should be extrinsically ordered. This claim is examined with respect to four well-known syntactic rules. Arguments which purport to establish that these rules must be extrinsically ordered are shown to be false, and solutions consistent with unordered rules are proposed as alternative explanations to the ordering hypothesis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1972 , pp. 541 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable