Several years ago I published in this journal an article concerning the form of Indo-European personal names. Were they typically dithematic, like Greek Aristo-bulos, Sanskrit Agni-datta, Iranian Ana-phes, Keltic Cingeto-rix, Old High German Fridu-berht, and hundreds of others in the onomastica of the various, especially the older Indo-European languages? Or were dithematic names only a special shape, disproportionately emphasized in the frequency of occurrence by the tradition and the kind of text at our disposal, at the expense of the much less recorded monothematic names? No doubt some monothematic names are hypocoristic abbreviations of dithematic ones; they are generally recognizable by either their stem or their ending. But a large number of available monothematic names are certainly original. Are they just as typically Indo-European, or less so, or more so?