Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

FINNIS ON THE AUTHORITY OF LAW AND THE COMMON GOOD

  • George Duke (a1)

Abstract

This paper seeks to elucidate the role played by the common good in John Finnis's arguments for a generic and presumptive moral obligation to obey the law.1 Finnis's appeal to the common good constitutes a direct challenge to liberal and philosophical anarchist denials of a generic and presumptive obligation to obey the law.2 It is questionable, however, whether Finnis has presented the strongest possible case for his position. In the first section I outline Finnis's account of the relationship between basic goods, the common good, and the authority of law. Section II demonstrates how Finnis's emphasis upon the instrumental nature of the common good leaves his position vulnerable to Joseph Raz's objections3 that not all cases of law make a moral difference and that governmental authority is often unnecessary to resolve coordination problems. I argue that Raz's critique nonetheless fails adequately to address an alternative defense of the existence of a generic and presumptive obligation to obey the law, suggested by some passages in Finnis's work, according to which the common good is integral, rather than merely instrumental, to the good of individuals. In the final section I consider whether Finnis could strengthen his case for a generic and presumptive obligation to obey the law by adopting a more consistently robust—and hence also more contentious—account of the common good.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aiyar, S. (2000) “The Problem of Law's Authority: John Finnis and Joseph Raz on Legal Obligation.” Law and Philosophy 19: 465489.
Dworkin, R. (1986) Law's Empire (Harvard University Press).
Edmundson, W. A. (2004) “State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law.” Legal Theory 10: 215259.
Finnis, J. (1983) Fundamentals of Ethics (Clarendon Press).
Finnis, J. (1984) “The Authority of Law in the Predicament of Contemporary Social Theory.” Notre Dame Journal of Legal Ethics and Public Policy 1: 115137.
Finnis, J. (1987) “On Reason and Authority in Law's Empire.” Law and Philosophy 6: 357380.
Finnis, J. (1996) “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?” In George, R.P., ed., Natural Law, Liberalism and Morality, 126 (Clarendon Press).
Finnis, J. (1998) “Public Good: The Specifically Political Common Good in Aquinas.” In George, R.P., ed., Natural Law and Moral Inquiry: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Politics in the Work of Germain Grisez, 174210 (Georgetown University Press).
Finnis, J. (2011) “Aquinas’ Moral, Political and Legal Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas-moral-political/.
Finnis, J. (2011) Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2d ed. (Oxford University Press).
Finnis, J. (2011) Collected Essays. Volumes 15 (Oxford University Press).
Hittinger, R. (1987) A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory (Notre Dame University Press).
Horton, J. (2006) “In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One.” Political Studies 54: 427443.
Horton, J. (2007) “In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two.” Political Studies 55: 119.
Murphy, M.C. (2005) “The Common Good.” Review of Metaphysics 59: 133164.
Pakaluk, M. (2001) “Is the Common Good of Political Society Limited and Instrumental?Review of Metaphysics 55: 5794.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press).
Horton, J. (1993) Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press).
Horton, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press).
Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom (Clarendon Press).
Raz, J. (1994) Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Clarendon Press).
Raz, J. (2009) Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford University Press).
Simmons, A.J. (2001) Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations (Cambridge University Press).
Walzer, M. (1994) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame Press).
Westerman, P. (1998) The Disintegration of Natural Law Theory (Leiden: Brill Studies in Intellectual History).
Wolff, R.P. (1970) In Defence of Anarchism (Harper and Row).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Legal Theory
  • ISSN: 1352-3252
  • EISSN: 1469-8048
  • URL: /core/journals/legal-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed