Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:31:08.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring causes of the decline of the lichen Lecanora conizaeoides in Britain: effects of experimental N and S applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2009

A. C. MASSARA ,
J. W. BATES  and
J. N. B. BELL
A. C. MASSARA
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
J. W. BATES*
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
J. N. B. BELL
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
*
Email: j.bates@imperial.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crustose lichen Lecanora conizaeoides has declined markedly around London with progressively diminishing sulphur dioxide pollution of the air since the 1960s. To identify the immediate causes of its decline, we applied S in the form of bisulphite (0·2 & 2 mM) and sulphate (2 mM), and N as nitrate (2 mM) to relict colonies of the lichen on beech trunks in a plantation in Windsor Forest. Growth of the lichen was monitored by estimating changes in percentage cover. By the end of a 25-month period of two-weekly treatments, all the chemical treatments had resulted in significant decreases in cover of L. conizaeoides compared to distilled water controls, with the 2 mM bisulphite causing the greatest loss. Bark surface pH was also lowered by the chemical treatments, but most by the 2 mM bisulphite applications. Similar results were obtained in two laboratory experiments where the nutrient applications were repeated under a controlled environment and thallus area monitored photographically. No evidence was obtained to support the hypothesis that growth of L. conizaeoides is stimulated by an elevated sulphur supply. We conclude that the disappearance of the lichen is linked to gradual increase in bark pH caused by the combined effects of a marked reduction in SO2 emissions and rising emissions of NH3.

Keywords

epiphyteslichenspollutionSO2NOxNH3
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 41 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 673 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadjian, V. (1973 a) Resynthesis of lichens. In The Lichens. (Ahmadjian, V. & Hale, M. E., eds): 565–579. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadjian, V. (1973 b) Methods of isolating and culturing lichen symbionts and thalli. In The Lichens. (Ahmadjian, V. & Hale, M. E., eds): 653–659. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, M. S., Ferry, B. W. & Finegan, E. J. (1972) The effects of sulphur dioxide on lichen respiration. Lichenologist 5: 283–291.Google Scholar
Bates, J. W., Bell, J. N. B. & Farmer, A. M. (1990) Epiphyte recolonisation of oaks along a gradient of air pollution in south-east England, 1979–1990. Environmental Pollution 68: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, J. W., McNee, P. J. & McLeod, A. P. (1996) Effects of sulphur dioxide and ozone on lichen colonization of conifers in the Liphook Forest Fumigation Project. New Phytologist 132: 653–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, J. W., Bell, J. N. B. & Massara, A. C. (2001) Loss of Lecanora conizaeoides and other fluctuations of epiphytes on oak in S.E. England over 21 years with declining SO2 concentrations. Atmospheric Environment 35: 2557–2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batty, K., Bates, J. W. & Bell, J. N. B. (2003) A transplant experiment on the factors preventing lichen colonization of oak bark in southeast England under declining SO2 pollution. Canadian Journal of Botany 81: 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, R., Emes, M. J. & Lee, J. A. (1989) The relationship between extracellular metal accumulation and bisulphite tolerance in Sphagnum cuspidatum Hoffm. New Phytologist 111: 463–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bharali, B. & Bates, J. W. (2002) Soil cations influence bryophyte susceptibility to bisulfite. Annals of Botany 90: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D. H. & Tomlinson, H. (1993) Effects of nitrogen salts on lichen physiology. In Phytochemistry and Chemotaxonomy of Lichenized Ascomycetes (Feige, G. B. & Lumbsch, H. T., eds): 27–34. Stuttgart: J. Cramer.Google Scholar
Cape, J.N. (1984). The importance of solution equilibria in studying the effects of sulphite on plants. Environmental Pollution 34: 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cape, J. N., Tang, Y. S., van Dijk, N., Love, L., Sutton, M. A. & Palmer, S. C. F. (2004) Concentrations of ammonia and nitrogen dioxide at roadside verges, and their contribution to nitrogen deposition. Environmental Pollution 132: 469–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falkengren-Grerup, U. (1989) Effect of stemflow on beech forest soils and vegetation in southern Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, A. M., Bates, J. W. & Bell, J. N. B. (1990) A comparison of methods for the measurement of bark pH. Lichenologist 22: 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, P. & Lee, J. A. (1979) The effects of bisulphite and sulphate upon photosynthesis in Sphagnum. New Phytologist 82: 703–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, O. L. (1969) The effect of SO2 on lichens and bryophytes around Newcastle upon Tyne. In Air Pollution, Proceedings of the First European Congress on the Influence of Air Pollution on Plants and Animals, Wageningen 1968: 223–235. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Gilbert, O. L. (1970) Further studies on the effect of sulphur dioxide on lichens and bryophytes. New Phytologist 69: 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, O. L. (1988) Studies on the destruction of Lecanora conizaeoides by the lichenicolous fungus Athelia arachnoidea. Lichenologist 20: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauck, M., Hesse, V., Jung, R., Zoller, T. & Runge, M. (2001) Long-distance transported sulphur as a limiting factor for the abundance of Lecanora conizaeoides in montane spruce forests. Lichenologist 33: 267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. & McManus, P. M. (1992) Lichen recolonization in London under conditions of rapidly falling sulphur dioxide levels, and the concept of zone skipping. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 109: 99–109.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. & Rose, F. (1970) Qualitative scale for estimating sulphur dioxide air pollution in England and Wales using epiphytic lichens. Nature 227: 145–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawksworth, D. L. & Rose, F. (1976) Lichens as Pollution Monitors. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L., Rose, F. & Coppins, B. J. (1973) Changes in the lichen flora of England and Wales attributable to pollution of the air by sulphur dioxide. In Air Pollution and Lichens (Ferry, B. W., Baddeley, M. S. & Hawksworth, D. L., eds): 330–367. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hill, D. J. (1971) Experimental study of the effect of sulphite on lichens with reference to atmospheric pollution. New Phytologist 73: 1193–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. J. (1974) Some effects of sulphite on photosynthesis in lichens. New Phytologist 73: 1193–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaGreca, S. & Stutzman, B. W. (2006) Distribution and ecology of Lecanora conizaeoides (Lecanoraceae) in eastern Massachusetts. Bryologist 109: 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen Vilsholm, R., Wolseley, P. A., Søchting, U. & Chimonides, P. J. (2009) Biomonitoring with lichens on twigs. Lichenologist 41: 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laundon, J. R. (1967) A study of the lichen flora of London. Lichenologist 3: 277–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laundon, J. R. (1973) Urban lichen studies. In Air pollution and Lichens (Ferry, B. W., Baddeley, M. S. & Hawksworth, D. L., eds): 109–123. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Massara, A. C. (2004) The ecology and physiology of the pollution tolerant lichen, Lecanora conizaeoides. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
Monteith, D. T. & Evans, C. D. (2005) The United Kingdom Acid Waters Monitoring Network: a review of the first fifteen years and introduction to the special issue. Environmental Pollution 137: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, R. & Thompson, P. G. (1913) Report on the lichens of Epping Forest. Essex Naturalist 17: 90–105.Google Scholar
Pilegaard, K. (1978) Airborne metals and sulphur dioxide monitored by epiphytic lichens in an industrial area. Environmental Pollution 17: 81–92.Google Scholar
Puckett, K. J., Richardson, D. H. S., Flora, W. P. & Nieboer, E. (1974) Photosynthetic 14C fixation by the lichen Umbilicaria muhlenbergii (Ach.) Tuck. following short exposures to aqueous sulphur dioxide. New Phytologist 73: 1183–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. H. S., Nieboer, E, Lavoie, P. & Padovan, D. (1979) The role of metal-ion binding in modifying the toxic effects of sulphur dioxide on the lichen Umbilicaria muhlenbergii. II. C14-fixation studies. New Phytologist 82: 633–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, C. I. & Hawksworth, D. L. (1981) Lichen recolonization in London's cleaner air. Nature 289: 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, M. A., Dragosits, U., Tang, Y. S. & Fowler, D. (2000) Ammonia emissions from non-agricultural sources in the UK. Atmospheric Environment 34: 855–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, R., Wirth, V. & Lange, O. L. (1974) CO2-gaswechsel-untersuchunge, zur SO2-resistenz von Flechten. Oecologia 15: 33–64.Google Scholar
van Dobben, H. F. & de Bakker, A. J. (1996)Re-mapping epiphytic lichen biodiversity in the Netherlands: effects of decreasing SO2 and increasing NH3. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Herk, C. M. (1999) Mapping of ammonia pollution with epiphytic lichens in the Netherlands. Lichenologist 31: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Herk, C. M. (2001) Bark pH and susceptibility to toxic air pollutants as independent causes of changes in epiphytic lichen composition in space and time. Lichenologist 33: 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, V. (1985) Zur Ausbreitung, Herkunft und Ökologie anthropogen geförderter Rinden- und Holtzflechten. Tuxenia 5: 523–535.Google Scholar
Wirth, V. (1993) Trendwende bei der Ausbreitung der anthropogen geförderter Flechte Lecanora conizaeoides? Phytocoenologia 23: 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolseley, P. A., James, P. W., Theobald, M. R. & Sutton, M. A. (2006) Detecting changes in epiphytic lichen communities at sites affected by atmospheric ammonia from agricultural sources. Lichenologist 38: 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar