Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T08:20:59.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MODELLING THE ELECTRON WITH COSSERAT ELASTICITY

Part of: Equations of mathematical physics and other areas of application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2012

James Burnett  and
Dmitri Vassiliev
James Burnett
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Institute of Origins, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K. (email: J.Burnett@ucl.ac.uk)
Dmitri Vassiliev
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Institute of Origins, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K. (email: D.Vassiliev@ucl.ac.uk)
Get access

Abstract

We suggest an alternative mathematical model for the electron in dimension 1+2. We think of our (1+2)-dimensional spacetime as an elastic continuum whose material points can experience no displacements, only rotations. This framework is a special case of the Cosserat theory of elasticity. Rotations of material points are described mathematically by attaching to each geometric point an orthonormal basis which gives a field of orthonormal bases called the coframe. As the dynamical variables (unknowns) of our theory we choose a coframe and a density. We then add an extra (third) spatial dimension, extend our coframe and density into dimension 1+3, choose a conformally invariant Lagrangian proportional to axial torsion squared, roll up the extra dimension into a circle so as to incorporate mass and return to our original (1+2)-dimensional spacetime by separating out the extra coordinate. The main result of our paper is the theorem stating that our model is equivalent to the Dirac equation in dimension 1+2. In the process of analysing our model we also establish an abstract result, identifying a class of nonlinear second order partial differential equations which reduce to pairs of linear first order equations.

MSC classification

Secondary: 35Q41: Time-dependent Schrödinger equations, Dirac equations 35Q74: PDEs in connection with mechanics of deformable solids

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 349 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Ball, J. M. and Zarnescu, A., Orientable and non-orientable director fields for liquid crystals. Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 7(1) (2007), 1050701–1050704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Berestetskii, V. B., Lifshitz, E. M. and Pitaevskii, L. P., Quantum Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. (Course of theoretical physics 4), Butterworth–Heinemann (Oxford, 1982), translated from the Russian by J. B. Sykes and J. S. Bell.Google Scholar
[3]Böhmer, C. G., Downes, R. J. and Vassiliev, D., Rotational elasticity. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 64(4) (2011), 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Burnett, J. and Vassiliev, D., Weyl’s Lagrangian in teleparallel form. J. Math. Phys. 50(10) (2009), 102501, 17pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Cartan, É., Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de riemann et les espaces à torsion. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 174 (1922), 593–595.Google Scholar
[6]Cartan, É. and Einstein, A., Letters on Absolute Parallelism, 1929–1932, Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ, 1979), original text with English translation by Jules Leroy and Jim Ritter, edited by Robert Debever.Google Scholar
[7]Chervova, O. and Vassiliev, D., The stationary Weyl equation and Cosserat elasticity. J. Phys. A 43(33) (2010), 335203, 14pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Cosserat, E. and Cosserat, F., Théorie des corps déformables, Librairie Scientifique A. Hermann et Fils (Paris, 1909), reprinted by Cornell University Library.Google Scholar
[9]Elton, D. and Vassiliev, D., The Dirac equation without spinors. In The Maz’ya Anniversary Collection, Vol. 2 (Rostock, 1998) (Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 110), Birkhäuser (Basel, 1999), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Griffiths, J. B. and Newing, R. A., Tetrad equations for the two-component neutrino field in general relativity. J. Phys. A 3 (1970), 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hehl, F. W. and Obukhov, Y. N., Élie Cartan’s torsion in geometry and in field theory, an essay. Ann. Fond. Louis de Broglie 32(2,3) (2007), 157–194.Google Scholar
[12]Nester, J. M., Special orthonormal frames. J. Math. Phys. 33(3) (1992), 910–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Obukhov, Y. N., Conformal invariance and space-time torsion. Phys. Lett. A 90(1,2) (1982), 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Sauer, T., Field equations in teleparallel space-time: Einstein’s fernparallelismus approach toward unified field theory. Historia Math. 33(4) (2006), 399–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Unzicker, A. and Case, T., Translation of Einstein’s attempt of a unified field theory with teleparallelism. Preprint, 2005, arXiv:physics/0503046v1.Google Scholar
[16]Vassiliev, D., Teleparallel model for the neutrino. Phys. Rev. D 75(2) (2007), 025006, 6pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar