Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-t9bwh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-08T22:05:35.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rejuvenation of soft material–actuator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Aslan Miriyev*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, 500 W 120th St., Mudd 220, New York, NY 10027, USA
Cesar Trujillo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, 500 W 120th St., Mudd 220, New York, NY 10027, USA
Gabriela Caires
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, 500 W 120th St., Mudd 220, New York, NY 10027, USA
Hod Lipson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, 500 W 120th St., Mudd 220, New York, NY 10027, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Aslan Miriyev at aslan.miriyev@columbia.edu
Get access

Abstract

Akin to the natural tissues, soft artificial muscles possess a life cycle limited by aging and degradation phenomena. Here, we propose a rejuvenation method aimed at silicone-ethanol soft composite actuators, in which ethanol escape occurs during prolonged actuation, thus compromising their performance. The rejuvenation is achieved by immersion of the material–actuator in ethanol, allowing its diffusion into the silicone-based material until saturation. Repeatable rejuvenation of a soft robot, based on the soft material–actuator, resulted in retention of up to 100% of its functionality. Thus, we suggest that this method may be used for the rejuvenation of soft artificial muscles and material–actuators.

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rus, D., and Tolley, M.T.: Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Miriyev, A., Stack, K., and Lipson, H.: Soft material for soft actuators. Nat. Commun. 8, 1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Sridar, S., Majeika, C.J., Schaffer, P., Bowers, M., Ueda, S., Barth, A.J., Sorrells, J.L., Wu, J.T., Hunt, T.R., and Popovic, M.: Hydro Muscle – a novel soft fluidic actuator. In 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (IEEE, 2016), pp. 40144021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Shepherd, R.F., Ilievski, F., Choi, W., Morin, S.A., Stokes, A.A., Mazzeo, A.D., Chen, X., Wang, M., and Whitesides, G.M.: Multigait soft robot. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20400 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Tolley, M.T., Shepherd, R.F., Mosadegh, B., Galloway, K.C., Wehner, M., Karpelson, M., Wood, R.J., and Whitesises, G.M.: A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robot. 1, 213 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., Galloway, K.C., Wood, R.J., and Walsh, C.J.: Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Rob. Auton. Syst. 73, 135 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Marchese, A.D., Katzschmann, R.K., and Rus, D.: A Recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots. Soft Robot. 2, 7 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.De Greef, A., Lambert, P., and Delchambre, A.: towards flexible medical instruments: Review of flexible fluidic actuators. Precis. Eng. 33, 311 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chou, C.-P., and Hannaford, B.: Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12, 90 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Obiajulu, S. C., Roche, E. T., Pigula, F. A., and Walsh, C. J.: In 37th Mechanisms and Robotics Conf. (ASME, 2013), Vol. 6A p. V06AT07A009.Google Scholar
11.Wirekoh, J., and Park, Y.-L.: Design of flat pneumatic artificial muscles. Smart Mater. Struct. 26, 35009 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Nguyen, C. T., Phung, H., Nguyen, T. D., Jung, H., and Choi, H. R.: Multiple-degrees-of-freedom dielectric elastomer actuators for soft printable hexapod robot. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 267, 505 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.O'Halloran, A., O'Malley, F., and McHugh, P.: A review on dielectric elastomer actuators, technology, applications, and challenges. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 1 (2008).Google Scholar
14.Gu, G.-Y., Zhu, J., Zhu, L.-M., and Zhu, X.: A survey on dielectric elastomer actuators for soft robots. Bioinspir. Biomim. 12, 11003 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Martinez, R. V., Glavan, A. C., Keplinger, C., Oyetibo, A. I., and Whitesides, G. M.: Soft Actuators and Robots that Are Resistant to Mechanical Damage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3003 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Terryn, S., Mathijssen, G., Brancart, J., Lefeber, D., Van Assche, G., and Vanderborght, B.: Development of a self-healing soft pneumatic actuator: a first concept. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 46007 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Shepherd, R. F., Stokes, A. A., Nunes, R. M. D., and Whitesides, G. M.: Soft machines that are resistant to puncture and that self seal. Adv. Mater. 25, 6709 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Bilodeau, R. A., and Kramer, R. K.: Self-healing and damage resilience for soft robotics: a review. Front. Robot. AI 4, 48 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Hunt, S., McKay, T. G., and Anderson, I. A.: A self-healing dielectric elastomer actuator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 113701 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Acome, E., Mitchell, S. K., Morrissey, T. G., Emmett, M. B., Benjamin, C., King, M., Radakovitz, M., and Keplinger, C.: Hydraulically amplified self-healing electrostatic actuators with muscle-like performance. Science 359, 61 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Pourazadi, S., Shagerdmootaab, A., Chan, H., Moallem, M., and Menon, C.: On the electrical safety of dielectric elastomer actuators in proximity to the human body. Smart Mater. Struct. 26, 115007 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Miriyev, A., Caires, G., and Lipson, H.: Functional properties of silicone/ethanol soft-actuator composites. Mater. Des. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Tamai, Y., Tanaka, H., and Nakanishi, K.: Molecular simulation of permeation of small penetrants through membranes. 1. diffusion coefficients. Macromolecules 27, 4498 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Okamoto, K., Nishioka, S., Tsuru, S., Sasaki, S., Tanaka, K., and Kita, H.: Sorption and pervaporation of water-organic liquid mixtures through polydimethylsiloxane. Kobunshi Ronbunshu 45, 993 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Comyn, J.: In Polym. Permeability (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1985), pp. 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Crank, J.: The Mathematics of Diffusion (Oxford University Press, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
27.Jones, F.: In Theory Color. Text (Society of Dyers and Colorists, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, 1989), pp. 373427.Google Scholar
28.Crank, J., and Park, G. S.: Diffusion in Polymer, First Edit (Academic Press, London and New York, 1968).Google Scholar
29.Karimi, M.: In Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes (InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Miriyev et al. supplementary material

Miriyev et al. supplementary material 1

Download Miriyev et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.8 MB