Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Stangland, Eric E. 2018. Shale Gas Implications for C2-C3 Olefin Production: Incumbent and Future Technology. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 341.
    Monroe, Morgan M Lobaccaro, Peter Lum, Yanwei and Ager, Joel W 2017. Membraneless laminar flow cell for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction with liquid product separation. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 50, Issue. 15, p. 154006.
    Tol, Richard S.J. 2017. The structure of the climate debate. Energy Policy, Vol. 104, Issue. , p. 431.
    ×
  • Access

Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability

  • M.J. Kelly (a1)
Abstract

There are lessons from recent history of technology introductions which should not be forgotten when considering alternative energy technologies for carbon dioxide emission reductions.

The growth of the ecological footprint of a human population about to increase from 7B now to 9B in 2050 raises serious concerns about how to live both more efficiently and with less permanent impacts on the finite world. One present focus is the future of our climate, where the level of concern has prompted actions across the world in mitigation of the emissions of CO2. An examination of successful and failed introductions of technology over the last 200 years generates several lessons that should be kept in mind as we proceed to 80% decarbonize the world economy by 2050. I will argue that all the actions taken together until now to reduce our emissions of carbon dioxide will not achieve a serious reduction, and in some cases, they will actually make matters worse. In practice, the scale and the different specific engineering challenges of the decarbonization project are without precedent in human history. This means that any new technology introductions need to be able to meet the huge implied capabilities. An altogether more sophisticated public debate is urgently needed on appropriate actions that (i) considers the full range of threats to humanity, and (ii) weighs more carefully both the upsides and downsides of taking any action, and of not taking that action.

  • View HTML
      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © Materials Research Society 2016 
Corresponding author
a) Address all correspondence to M.J. Kelly at mjk1@cam.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1. Malthus, T.R.: An Essay on the Principle of Population, (1798), Gilbert, G. ed.; Oxford Paperbacks Oxford World’s Classics: Oxford, UK, 2008, 208 pages.
2. Mayhew, R.J.: Malthus: The Life and Legacies of an Untimely Prophet (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
3. Selections from the Edinburgh Review Comprising the Best Articles Form that Journal, from its Commencement to the Present Time with a Preliminary Dissertation and Explanatory Notes, Cross, M. ed., Vol. III (of VI); Baudry's European Library: Paris (1835); p. 133.
4. Stanley Jevons, W., The Coal Question, 2nd ed. (Macmillan and Co., London, UK, 1866).
5. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., and Behrens Ill, W.W.: Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (New American Library, New York, 1977), paperback, ISBN 0-451-13695-0; Universe Books, New York (1972), ISBN 0-87663-222-3.
6. Murray, J. and King, D.: Oil's tipping point has passed. Nature 481, 433–435 (2012).
7. Lomborg, B.: The Sceptical Environmentalist (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001), Fig. 62.
8. Hansen, J., Kharecha, P., and Sato, M.: Climate forcing growth rates: Doubling down on our Faustian bargain. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 011006 (9pp) (2013).
9. Kelly, M.J.: Why a collapse of global civilization will be avoided: A comment on Ehrlich and Ehrlich. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20131193 (2013).
10. Note the number of distinguished Fellows of the Royal Society associated with the Global Warming Policy Foundation, led by Lord Lawson, with whom the then President of the Royal Society has had a public spat. See http://www.thegwpf.com/lord-lawsons-letter-sir-paul-nurse/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
11. Montford, A.: Nullius in verba: On the Word of No One: The Royal Society and Climate Change (The Global Warming Policy Foundation, GWPF Report, 2012), p. 6, http://www.thegwpf.org/images/stories/gwpf-reports/montford-royal_society.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
12. The National Academy of Sciences and The Royal Society: Climate Change: Evidence & Causes: An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences (Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, 2014), https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/climate-evidence-causes/climate-change-evidence-causes.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
13. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R.: A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues. In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, Costanza, R. ed.; Columbia University Press: New York, 1991; pp. 137–152.
14. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution: Energy—The Changing Climate, Twenty-second Report (2000). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110322143804/http://www.rcep.org.uk/reports/22-energy/22-energyreport.pdf.
15. The United Kingdom Committee on Climate Change: http://www.theccc.org.uk/.
16. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) (2013). http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/index.shtml.
17. Allitt, P.: A Climate of Crisis: America in the Age of Environmentalism (Penguin, New York, 2014).
18. International Energy Agency: World Energy Outlook (2013). http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/publications/weo-2013/#d.en.36200.
20. MacKay, D.J.C.: Sustainable Energy: Without the Hot Air (UIT Cambridge Ltd, 2009). Available from: http://www.withouthotair.com. (accessed November 10, 2015).
21. The BP Energy Outlook (2015). http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook-2015/bp-energy-outlook-2035-booklet.pdf, Slide 12(b). (accessed November 10, 2015).
22. Ernst and Young: Hitting the Sweet Spot: The Growth of the Middle Class in Emerging Markets (2013). http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Hitting_the_sweet_spot/$FILE/Hitting_the_sweet_spot.pdf and Kharas, H. and Gertz, G.: The New Global Middle Class: A Cross-Over from West to East (Wolfensohn Center for Development at The Brookings Institute, http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2010/3/china-middle-class-kharas/03_china_middle_class_kharas.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
23. Weißbach, D., Ruprech, G., Huke, A., Czerski, K., Gottlieb, S., and Hussein, A.: Energy intensities, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants. Energy 52, 210–221 (2013). (accessed November 10, 2015).
24. Prieto, P.A. and Hall, C.A.S.: Spain’s Photovoltaic Revolution: The Energy Return on Investment (Springer, New York, 2013).
25. Fulton, M. and Capalino, R.: Investing in the Clean Trillion: Closing the Investment Gap: A Ceres Report (2015); pp. 74: http://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/investing-in-the-clean-trillion-closing-the-clean-energy-investment-gap/view. (accessed November 10, 2015).
26. Kelly, M.J.: Technology introductions in the context of decarbonisation: Lessons from recent history (The Global Warming Policy Foundation, London, 2014). http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2014/03/Kelly-lessons.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
27. Fuel density data provided by Professor Douglas Paul, University of Glasgow.
28. Kelly, M.J.: Energy efficiency, resilience to future climates and long-term sustainability: The role of the built environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 368, 1083–10839 (2010).
29. My own detailed study remains unpublished. The typical costs of order £150K per household from an exemplar project to retrofit exemplar houses to achieve a 60% reduction in energy under the UK's ‘Retrofit for the Future’ programme, (https://retrofit.innovateuk.org/) have been reduced to £50K per household on the assumption that benefits of a learning curve will have been captured.
30. Hopkins, P.D. and Austin Dacey, A.: Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? J. Agr. Environ. Ethics 21, 579–596 (2008).
31. Geels, F.W. and Smit, W.A., Failed technology futures: Pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures 32, 867–885 (2000).
32. The Royal Academy of engineering: UK Wasting Billions on IT Projects. http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/news-releases/2004/April/uk-wasting-billions-on-it-projects. (accessed November 10, 2015).
33. Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century: Knowledge, Networks and Nations, The Royal Society Report (2011) https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/knowledge-networks-nations/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
34. Mazzucato, M.: The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private sector myths (Anthem, London, 2013).
35. See the rules for grant applications at http://www.darpa.mil/About.aspx or http://www.sbir.gov/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
36. For details of how insects are attached by the bright lights and birds, including birds of prey follow them into the hot zone, see http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/15/solar-fossil-fueled-fantasies/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
38. Nelson, T., The green jobs debacle (2012) at, http://tomnelson.blogspot.co.nz/2012/10/the-green-jobs-debacle.html. (accessed November 10, 2015).
39. The renewable energy industrial index: http://www.renewable-energy-industry.com/stocks/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
40. EU finalizes China solar panel subsidy probe: http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/china-solar-energy.qbg. (accessed November 10, 2015).
41. Kelly, A.: Climate Policy and the Poor (The Global Warming Policy Foundation, London, 2014). http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2014/06/Tony-Kelly.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
42. Google the phrase “immature battery technology” for many reports.
43. Friedman, T.L.: Hot Flat and Crowded—Why We Need a Green Revolution and How It can Renew America (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York, 2008).
44. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, summary of the 2013 report: http://www.itrs2.net/2013-itrs.html.
45. Gifford, R.: The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66(4), 290–302 (2011).
46. The UK Office of gas and electricity markets, press release: (2012). https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/76263/20120716riiopressrelease.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
47. Tweed, K.: Europe Mothballs 20GW of Gas Plants in 2013, With More to Come (2014). http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/europe-mothballs-20gw-of-gas-plants-in-2013-with-more-to-come. (accessed November 10, 2015).
48. Helm, D.: The Carbon Crunch (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2013).
49. Lewis, N.: The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates. Climate dynamics (May 2105) http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-015-2653-7/fulltext.html. (accessed November 10, 2015).
50. Vahrenholt, F. and Luning, S.: The Neglected Sun (Stacey International, London, 2013), A translation of ‘Die kalte Sonne: warum die Klimakatastrophe nicht stattfindet’, (Hoffmann und Campe) (2012).
52. Public data and the energy density from Ref. 17.
53. Pearce, F.: Peoplequake (Transworld, London, 2011).
54. Lutz, W.: The end of world population growth. Nature 412, 543–545 (2001).
55. Idso, C.D.: The Positive Externalities of Carbon Dioxide, http://www.globalwarming.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/10/MonetaryBenefitsofRisingCO2onGlobalFoodProduction.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
56. Donohue, R.J., Roderick, M.L., McVicar, T.R., and Farquhar, G.D.: Impact of CO2 fertilization on maximum foliage cover across the globe's warm, arid environments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3031–3035 (2013).
57. The Royal Society: Climate change: A summary of the science (2010) https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2010/climate-change-summary-science/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
58. The Foundation for Science and Technology: Debate Summary: What is the Right Level of Response to Anthropogenic Induced Climate Change? http://www.foundation.org.uk/Events/pdf/20140616_Summary.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
59. Smithsonian SmartNews: How Many Birds so Windmills Actually Kill? http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-many-birds-do-wind-turbines-really-kill-180948154/. (accessed November 10, 2015).
60. Roston, E.: Don’t panic: Earth’s Nine Threats to Humanity (2011) http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2011-12-12/don-t-panic-earth-s-nine-threats-to-humanity.html#slide6.
61. 71 new papers reported in 2013 demonstrating the Sun controls climate, not man-made CO2, see http://bit.ly/1bpzysw and Ref. 50. (accessed November 10, 2015).
62. For the closure of two major aluminium smelters in the UK see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglesey_Aluminium, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcan_Lynemouth_Aluminium_Smelter. (accessed November 10, 2015).
63. Official Report of the UK Department for Energy and Climate Change (2014): 2013 UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Provisional Figures and 2012 UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Final Figures by Fuel Type and End-User https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/295968/20140327_2013_UK_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Provisional_Figures.pdf. (accessed November 10, 2015).
64. For a description of the threats of tsunamis, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatsunami. (accessed November 10, 2015).
65. For a description of the threats of volcanos, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supervolcano. (accessed November 10, 2015).
66. For a description of the threats of meteors, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteoroid#Meteor. (accessed November 10, 2015).
67. The Environmental and Energy Study Institute's current statement on vehicle efficiency: http://www.eesi.org/topics/vehicle-efficiency/description. (accessed November 10, 2015).
68. Bajzelj, B., Allwood, M.J., and Cullen, J.M.: Designing climate change mitigation plans that add up. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 8062–8069 (2013).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Energy & Sustainability
  • ISSN: 2329-2229
  • EISSN: 2329-2237
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-energy-and-sustainability
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12714
Total number of PDF views: 1132 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3565 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×