Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Nurturing transformative U.S. energy research: Two guiding principles

  • Venkatesh Narayanamurti (a1) and Jeffrey Y. Tsao (a2)
Abstract

We raise for debate and discussion what in our opinion is a growing mis-control and mis-protection of U.S. energy research. We outline the origin of this mis-control and mis-protection, and propose two guiding principles to mitigate them and instead nurture research: (1) focus on people, not projects; and (2) culturally insulate research from development, but not science from technology.

Energy research is critical to continuing advances in human productivity and welfare. In this Commentary, we raise for debate and discussion what in our view is a growing mis-control and mis-protection of U.S. energy research. This flawed approach originates in natural human tendencies exacerbated by an historical misunderstanding of research and development, science and technology, and the relationships between them. We outline the origin of the mis-control and mis-protection, and propose two guiding principles to mitigate them and instead nurture research: (i) focus on people, not projects; and (ii) culturally insulate research from development, but not science from technology. Our hope is to introduce these principles into the discourse now, so they can help guide policy changes in U.S. energy research and development that are currently being driven by powerful geopolitical winds.

Summary: Two foundational guiding principles are proposed to mitigate a growing mis-control and mis-protection of U.S. energy research, and instead to nurture it.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nurturing transformative U.S. energy research: Two guiding principles
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nurturing transformative U.S. energy research: Two guiding principles
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nurturing transformative U.S. energy research: Two guiding principles
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Outside the United States, this is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
a)Address all correspondence to Jeffrey Y. Tsao at jytsao@sandia.gov
References
Hide All
1.Smalley, R.E.: Future global energy prosperity: The terawatt challenge. MRS Bull. 30(6), 412417 (2005).
2.Smil, V.: Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005).
3.Moniz, E.J., Jacoby, H.D., Meggs, A.J.M., Armstrong, R.C., Cohn, D.R., Connors, S.R., Deutch, J.M., Ejaz, Q.J., Hezir, J.S., and Kaufman, G.M.: The Future of Natural Gas (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2011).
4.Polman, A., Knight, M., Garnett, E.C., Ehrler, B., and Sinke, W.C.: Photovoltaic materials: Present efficiencies and future challenges. Science 352(6283), aad4424 (2016).
5.Tsao, J.Y., Crawford, M.H., Coltrin, M.E., Fischer, A.J., Koleske, D.D., Subramania, G.S., Wang, G.T., Wierer, J.J., and Karlicek, R.F.: Toward smart and ultra-efficient solid-state lighting. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2(9), 809836 (2014).
6.Narayanamurti, V., Anadon, L.D., and Sagar, A.D.: Transforming energy innovation. Issues Sci. Technol. 26(1), 5764 (2009).
7.Augustine, N.R. and Lane, N.: “Restoring the Foundation: The Vital Role of Research in Preserving the American Dream” (American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Cambridge, MA, 2014).
8.See, e.g., Trembath, A., Nordhaus, T., Shellenberger, M., and Jenkins, J.: US Government Role in Shale Gas Fracking History: An Overview (Breakthrough Institute, Oakland, CA, 2012).
9.Monk, D., Close, D., Perez, M., and Goodway, B.: Shale gas and geophysical developments. CSEG Recorder 36(1), 3438 (2011).
10.Patel, P. and Tsao, J.: Light-emitting diodes: A case study in engineering research. MRS Bull. 42(12), 880881 (2017).
11.See, e.g., Tsao, J.Y., Han, J., Haitz, R.H., and Pattison, P.M.: The blue LED nobel prize: Historical context, current scientific understanding, human benefit. Ann. Phys. 527(5–6) (2015).
12.Holonyak, N. Jr. and Bevacqua, S.F.: Coherent (visible) light emission from Ga(As1−xPx) junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1(4), 8283 (1962).
13.Amano, H., Sawaki, N., Akasaki, I., and Toyoda, Y.: Metalorganic vapor phase epitaxial growth of a high quality GaN film using an AlN buffer layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 48(5), 353355 (1986).
14.Amano, H., Kito, M., Hiramatsu, K., and Akasaki, I.: P-type conduction in Mg-doped GaN treated with low-energy electron beam irradiation (LEEBI). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28(12A), L2112 (1989).
15.Nakamura, S., Mukai, T., and Senoh, M.: Candela-class high-brightness InGaN/AlGaN double-heterostructure blue-light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(13), 16871689 (1994).
16.Perlin, J.: Silicon Solar Cell Turns 50 (No. NREL/BR-520-33947) (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 2004).
17.See, e.g., Green, M.A.: The path to 25% silicon solar cell efficiency: History of silicon cell evolution. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 17(3), 183189 (2009).
18.The energy sector has one of the lowest rates of innovation per unit of revenue in any sector, both in the U.S. [The Breakthrough Institute (2011). Bridging the Clean Energy Valleys of Death] and globally [The Global Energy Assessment (2012). Chapter 24: Policies for the Energy Technology Innovation System].
19.Stephan, P.E.: The economics of science. J. Econ. Lit. 34(3), 11991235 (1996).
20.Private companies with market or government-protected monopolies, like those that supported some of the great 20th century industrial laboratories, such as AT&T Bell Laboratories, did of course invest in and produce much path-breaking S&T research.
21.Chan, G., Goldstein, A.P., Bin-Nun, A., Anadon Diaz, L., and Narayanamurti, V.: Six principles for energy innovation. Nature 552(7683), 2527 (2017). Note that the focus of Chan et al. was the wider energy innovation process, including technology transfer, development and demonstration, while the focus of this Commentary is energy research, the foundational end of that innovation process.
22.Anadon, L.D., Bunn, M., and Narayanamurti, V., eds.: Transforming US Energy Innovation (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2014); pp. 1416.
23.Kelly, M.J.: Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability. MRS Energy & Sustainability: A Rev. J. 3, E3 (2016).
24.Narayanamurti, V. and Odumosu, T.: Cycles of Invention and Discovery (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016).
25.Original quote from Federico Capasso (Harvard University), as re-phrased in Ref. 24 (Chapter 6).
26.Newell, A. and Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving, Vol. 104, No. 9 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972).
27.Getzels, J.W.: Problem finding: A theoretical note. Cognit. Sci. 3(2), 167172 (1979).
28.A colloquial expression used often at Bell Labs. See Ref. 24 (Chapter 7).
29.This notion was epitomized by the culture of Bell Labs, as set forth in a talk by its vice-president of research during the invention of the transistor: Bown, R.: Vitality of a research institution and how to maintain it. In Conference on Administration of Research (Georgia Institute of Technology, 1953). See also a discussion of this talk in Ref. 24 (p. 76).
30.The importance of this notion was also recognized in early science-policy/management research: Nelson, R.: The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor. In Nelson, R.R., Ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962); pp. 549584.
31.See Ref. 24 (Chapter 6).
32.Gertner, J.: The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation (Penguin, New York, NY, 2013).
33.See Ref. 24 (Chapter 7).
34.Rubin, G.M.: Janelia farm: An experiment in scientific culture. Cell 125(2), 209212 (2006).
35.Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Unabridged) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1970).
36.Dosi, G.: Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Pol. 11(3), 147162 (1982).
37.Tsao, J.Y., Boyack, K.W., Coltrin, M.E., Turnley, J.G., and Gauster, W.B.: Galileo’s stream: A framework for understanding knowledge production. Res. Pol. 37(2), 330352 (2008).
38.Narayanamurti, V., Odumosu, T., and Vinsel, L.: RIP: The basic/applied research dichotomy. Issues Sci. Technol. 29(2), 3136 (2013).
39.Goudsmit, S.A.: Criticism, acceptance criteria, and refereeing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28(6), 331332 (1972).
40.Arthur, W.B.: The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, 2009).
41.Sarewitz, D.: Saving science. N. Atlantis 49, 440 (2016).
42.Whitesides, G.M. and Deutch, J.: Let’s get practical. Nature 469(7328), 2122 (2011).
43.Narayanamurti, V.: Engineering research: An underinvested-in weak link in the energy innovation ecosystem. MRS Bull. 42(12), 877 (2017).
44.Anadon, L.D., Chan, G., Bin-Nun, A.Y., and Narayanamurti, V.: The pressing energy innovation challenge of the US National Laboratories. Nat. Energy 1, 16117 (2016).
45.Of course, cross-fertilization between research and development is still extremely important, and mechanisms would need to be put in place so as not to intellectually isolate research from development.
46.Note that such a science and technology symbiosis would move DOE in a direction that the National Science Foundation (NSF), especially under Erich Bloch, moved long ago, with its Engineering Research Centers (ERCs) and Science and Technology Centers (STCs). See, e.g., Bozeman, B. and Boardman, C.: The NSF engineering research centers and the university–industry research revolution: A brief history featuring an interview with Erich Bloch. J. Technol. Trans. 29(3–4), 365-375 (2004). Also, see: S.C. Currall, E. Frauenheim, S.J. Perry, and E.M. Hunter: Organized innovation: A Blueprint for Renewing America’s Prosperity (Oxford University Press, 2014); Appendix A.
47.Andrews, N.C. and Narayanamurti, V.: On soloists, symphonies, and transdisciplinary research. Issues Sci. Technol. 30(1), 3032 (2013).
48.Schwarz, H.: On the usefulness of useless knowledge. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0001 (2017).
49.Stanley, K.O. and Lehman, J.: Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned (Springer, Switzerland, 2015).
50.Tsao, J.Y., Schubert, E.F., Fouquet, R., and Lave, M.: The electrification of energy: Long-term trends and opportunities. MRS Energy & Sustainability: A Rev. J. 5, E7 (2018).
51.Ramchurn, S.D., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N.R.: Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Commun. ACM 55(4), 8697 (2012).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Energy & Sustainability
  • ISSN: 2329-2229
  • EISSN: 2329-2237
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-energy-and-sustainability
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed