Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:18:16.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of Flash Annealing Parameters to Achieve Ultra-Shallow Junctions for sub-45nm CMOS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Pankaj Kalra
Affiliation:
pk@eecs.berkeley.edu, University of California, Berkeley, EECS, 373 Cory Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, United States, 510-643-2558, 510-643-2636
Prashant Majhi
Affiliation:
prashant.majhi@sematech.org, SEMATECH, Austin, TX, 78741, United States
Hsing-Huang Tseng
Affiliation:
hsing-huang.tseng@sematech.org, SEMATECH, Austin, TX, 78741, United States
Raj Jammy
Affiliation:
raj.jammy@sematech.org, SEMATECH, Austin, TX, 78741, United States
Tsu-Jae King Liu
Affiliation:
tking@eecs.berkeley.edu, University of California, Berkeley, EECS, Berkeley, CA, 94720, United States
Get access

Abstract

The use of millisecond annealing to meet ultra-shallow junction requirements for sub-45nm CMOS technologies is imperative. In this study, the effect of flash anneal parameters is presented. Reduced dopant diffusion and lower sheet resistance Rs is achieved for intermediate temperature Tint = 700°C (vs. 800°C). Significantly lower Rs is achieved with peak temperature Tpeak = 1300°C (vs. 1250°C). Multiple shots provide for lower Rs, albeit at the expense of increased dopant diffusion. Based on a simple quantitative model, an optimal flash anneal can achieve 82% dopant activation efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2006 Update.Google Scholar
2. Lerch, W., Paul, S., Niess, J., McCoy, S., Selinger, T., Gelpey, J., Cristiano, F., Severac, F., Gavelle, M., Boninelli, S., Pichler, P. and Bolze, D., Mat. Sci. Eng. B 124-125, (2005) 24.Google Scholar
3. Ito, T., Suguro, K., Itani, T., Nishinohara, K., Matsuo, K., and Saito, T., Symp. on VLSI Technology Tech. Dig., (2003) 53.Google Scholar
4. Adachi, K., Ohuchi, K., Aoki, N., Tsujii, H., Ito, T., Itokawa, H., Matsuo, K., Suguro, K., Honguh, Y., Tamaoki, N., Ishimaru, K., and Ishiuchi, H., Symp. on VLSI Technology Tech. Dig., (2005) 142.Google Scholar
5. Faifer, V. N., Current, M. I., Nguyen, T., Wong, T. M. H., and Souchkov, V. V., Ext. Abs. the Fifth International Workshop on Junction Technology, (2005) 45.Google Scholar