GPT-3 made the mainstream media headlines this year, generating far more interest than we’d normally expect of a technical advance in NLP. People are fascinated by its ability to produce apparently novel text that reads as if it was written by a human. But what kind of practical applications can we expect to see, and can they be trusted?

Funding for AI start-ups in general is booming, and natural language processing as a subfield has not missed out. We take a closer look at early-stage funding over the last year—just over US$1B in total—for companies that offer solutions that are based on or make significant use of NLP, providing a picture of what funders think is innovative and bankable in this space, and we make some observations on notable trends and developments.

The end of the calendar year always seems like a good time to pause for breath and reflect on what’s been happening over the last 12 months, and that’s as true in the world of commercial NLP as it is in any other domain. In particular, 2019 has been a busy year for voice assistance, thanks to the focus placed on this area by all the major technology players. So, we take this opportunity to review a number of key themes that have defined recent developments in the commercialization of voice technology.

It’s no secret that the commercial application of NLP technologies has exploded in recent years. From chatbots and virtual assistants to machine translation and sentiment analysis, NLP technologies are now being used in a wide variety of applications across a range of industries. With the increasing demand for technologies that can process human language, investors have been eager to get a piece of the action. In this article, we look at NLP startup funding over the past year, identifying the applications and domains that have received investment.

A lot has happened since OpenAI released ChatGPT to the public in November 2022. We review how things unfolded over the course of the year, tracking significant events and announcements from the tech giants leading the generative AI race and from other players of note; along the way we note the wider impacts of the technology’s progress.

The law has language at its heart, so it’s not surprising that software that operates on natural language has played a role in some areas of the legal profession for a long time. But the last few years have seen an increased interest in applying modern techniques to a wider range of problems, so I look here at how natural language processing is being used in the legal sector today.

If you’re in the market for an off-the-shelf text analytics API, you have a lot of options. You can choose to go with a major player in the software world, for whom each AI-related service is just another entry in their vast catalogues of tools, or you can go for a smaller provider that focusses on text analytics as their core business. In this first of two related posts, we look at what the most prominent software giants have to offer today.

We live in a post-truth world. It now matters more whether people think something is true than whether something really is true. This is dangerous, and technology is at least partly to blame. So, as technologists, how can we help to fix this?

Machine Translation research suffered a major blow in the 1960s, but it came back with a vengeance. From a commercial point of view, it’s now a mature technology that many Internet users take for granted. We look at where we are now, and consider the scope for new entrants into the market.

In almost every science fiction movie you’ll see people conversing with machines. Of course, the rise of intelligent personal assistants means you probably do this yourself already. This posting asks: what’s the difference? Also, recent news on Facebook acquisitions, spoken language translation, and sentiment analysis.

In the past few years, high-quality automated text-to-speech synthesis has effectively become a commodity, with easy access to cloud-based APIs provided by a number of major players. At the same time, developments in deep learning have broadened the scope of voice synthesis functionalities that can be delivered, leading to a growth in the range of commercially viable use cases. We take a look at the technology features and use cases that have attracted attention and investment in the past few years, identifying the major players and recent start-ups in the space.

It took a while, but natural language generation is now an established commercial software category. It’s commented upon frequently in both industry media and the mainstream press, and businesses are willing to pay hard cash to take advantage of the technology. We look at who’s active in the space, the nature of the technology that’s available today and where things might go in the future.

Ten years ago, Microsoft Word's grammar checker was really the only game in town. The software world, and the world of natural language processing, have changed a lot in that time, so what does the grammar checker marketplace have to offer today?

Automated writing assistance – a category that encompasses a variety of computer-based tools that help with writing – has been around in one form or another for 60 years, although it’s always been a relatively minor part of the NLP landscape. But the category has been given a substantial boost from recent advances in deep learning. We review some history, look at where things stand today, and consider where things might be going.

The commercialisation of natural language processing began over 35 years ago, but it’s only in the last year or two that it’s become substantially more visible, largely because of the intense popular interest in artificial intelligence. So what’s the state of commercial NLP today? We survey the main industry categories of relevance, and offer comment on where the action is today.

The technical and mainstream media’s headline coverage of AI invariably centers around the often astounding abilities demonstrated by large language models. That’s hardly surprising, since to all intents and purposes that’s where the newsworthy magic of generative AI lies. But it takes a village to raise a child: behind the scenes, there’s an entire ecosystem that supports the development and deployment of these models and the applications that are built on top of them. Some parts of that ecosystem are dominated by the Big Tech incumbents, but there are also many niches where start-ups are aiming to gain a foothold. We take a look at some components of that ecosystem, with a particular focus on ideas that have led to investment in start-ups over the last year or so.

With NLP services now widely available via cloud APIs, tasks like named entity recognition and sentiment analysis are virtually commodities. We look at what's on offer, and make some suggestions for how to get rich.

It’s now remarkably easy to release to the world a cloud-based application programming interface (API) that provides some software function as a service. As a consequence, the cloud API space has become very densely populated, so that even if a particular API offers a service whose potential value is considerable, there are many other factors that play a role in determining whether or not that API will be commercially successful. If you’re thinking about entering the API marketplace with your latest and greatest idea, this post offers some entirely subjective advice on how you might increase the chances of your offering not being lost in all the noise.

It seems like there’s yet another cloud-based text analytics Application Programming Interface (API) on the market every few weeks. If you’re interested in building an application using these kinds of services, how do you decide which API to go for? In the previous Industry Watch post, we looked at the text analytics APIs from the behemoths in the cloud software world: Amazon, Google, IBM and Microsoft. In this post, we survey sixteen APIs offered by smaller players in the market.

By all accounts, 2016 is the year of the chatbot. Some commentators take the view that chatbot technology will be so disruptive that it will eliminate the need for websites and apps. But chatbots have a long history. So what's new, and what's different this time? And is there an opportunity here to improve how our industry does technology transfer?