Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The state of property development in Turkey: facts and comparisons

  • Seda Demiralp (a1), Selva Demiralp (a2) and İnci Gümüş (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

In this article, we investigate economic and political developments in Turkey’s construction sector over the last decade and consider their implications. We find that during the first term of the government of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP), thanks to administrative and economic incentives, both private and public construction rose considerably. Despite the construction sector’s contribution to growth, there is also evidence of a transfer from the industrial sector toward the construction sector, which led to significant decline in the trend growth of the industrial sector in the era prior to 2006. Such evidence disappears in the post-crisis period, when the growth of private construction slows. However, overcentralization, clientelism, an absence of transparency, and limitations on citizen participation in urban planning remain as problems that need to be addressed through urban reform.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Acemoğlu Daron and Üçer Murat. “The Ups and Downs of Turkish Growth, 2002–2015: Political Dynamics, the European Union and the Institutional Slide.” NBER Working Paper No: 21608, 2015.
Atiyas İzak. “Economic Institutions and Institutional Change in Turkey during the Neoliberal Era.” New Perspectives on Turkey 14 (2012): 4569.
Babacan Ali. “İnşaatta Ölçüsüz Rantlar Var.” Yeni Şafak. September 16, 2014. http://www.yenisafak.com.tr/ekonomi/babacan-insaatta-olcusuz-rant-var-685512.
Bellin Eva. “Contingent Democrats: Industrialists, Labor, and Democratization in Late- Developing Countries.” World Politics 52 (2000): 175205.
Brown Allison and Kristiansen Annali. Urban Policies and the Right to the City: Rights, Responsibilities, and Citizenship. UNESCO, UN-HABITAT, March 2009. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001780/178090e.pdf.
Buğra Ayşe. State and Business in Modern Turkey. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
Buğra Ayşe and Savaşkan . “Politics and Class: The Turkish Business Environment in the Neoliberal Age.” New Perspectives on Turkey 46 (2012): 2763.
Camp Roderic. Entrepreneurs and Politics in Twentieth-Century Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Çavuşoğlu Erbatur. “İslamcı Neoliberalizmde İnşaat Fetişi ve Mülkiyet Üzerine Simgesel Hale.” Birikim 270 (2011): 4051.
Epstein David, Bates Robert, Goldstone Jack, Kristensen Ida and O’Halloran Sharyn. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (2006): 551569.
Eğilmez Mahfi. “İnşaata Dayalı Büyüme Modelinin Sonu.” August 10, 2015. http://www.mahfiegilmez.com/2015/08/insaat-onderliginde-buyume-modelinin.html.
Inglehart Ronald and Welzel Christian. “How Development Leads to Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 88, no. 2 (2009): 3348.
İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası. “Toki Değerlendirme Raporu.” November 13, 2011. http://www.imo.org.tr/resimler/dosya_ekler/2d6528de98702ba_ek.pdf?tipi=4&turu=H&sube=0.
“İnşaattaki Artış Diğer Sanayileri Engelliyor.” March 26, 2015. http://www.emlakguncel.com/haber/insaattaki-artis-diger-sanayileri-engelliyor.
Karaman Ozan. “Urban Neoliberalism with Islamic Characteristics.” Urban Studies 50, no. 16 (2013): 34123427.
Kuyucu Tuna and Ünsal Özlem. “Urban Transformation as State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul.” Urban Studies 47, no. 7 (2010): 14791499.
Lefebvre Henry. Writings on Cities. Translated and edited by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Lipset Seymour Martin. Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1963.
Moore Barrington Jr. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.
Pamuk Şevket. “2007 Sonrası Partiye Yakın Zengin Bir Zümre Yaratmak En Büyük Ekonomik Hedef Oldu.” Interview by Ezgi Başaran. Radikal. December 1, 2014. http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/ezgi_basaran/2007_sonrasi_partiye_yakin_zengin_bir_zumre_yaratmak_en_buyuk_ekonomik_hedef_oldu-1242057.
Penpecioğlu Mehmet. “Kapitalist Kentleşme Dinamiklerinin Türkiye’deki Son 10 Yılı: Yapılı Çevre Üretimi, Devlet ve Büyük Ölçekli Kentsel Projeler.” Birikim 270 (2011): 6273.
Purcell Mark. “Citizenship and the Right to the Global City: Reimagining the Capitalist World Order.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27, no. 3 (September 2003): 564590.
Rueschemeyer Dietrich, Stephens Evelyne Huber and Stephens John D., eds. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Sintomer Yves, Herzberg Carsten, Röcke Anja and Allegretti Giovanni. “Transnational Models of Citizen Participation: The Case of Participatory Budgeting.” Journal of Public Deliberation 8, no. 2 (2012): 134.
Shah Anwar, ed. Participatory Budgeting. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.
Törüner Yaman. “İnşaat Sektörü Krizden Nasıl Etkilenir?” Milliyet. January 29, 2008. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/insaat-sektoru-krizden-nasil-etkilenir-/yaman-toruner/ekonomi/yazardetayarsiv/29.01.2008/236508/default.htm.
Van Deusen Richard. “Public Space Design as Class Warfare: Urban Design, the ‘Right to the City’ and the Production of Clinton Square, Syracuse, NY.” GeoJournal 58, no. 2/3 (2002): 149158.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

New Perspectives on Turkey
  • ISSN: 0896-6346
  • EISSN: 1305-3299
  • URL: /core/journals/new-perspectives-on-turkey
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 471 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th January 2017 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.