Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:52:20.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Dispensing with Q?: Goodacre on the Relation of Luke to Matthew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2003

JOHN S. KLOPPENBORG
Affiliation:
Department for the Study of Religion, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 2E8, Canada

Abstract

The case against Q depends logically on the plausibility of Luke's direct use of Matthew. Goodacre's carefully argued book contends (a) that none of the objections to the Mark-without-Q hypothesis is valid; (b) that given certain assumptions about Luke's aesthetic preferences, it is plausible that he systematically reordered the ‘Q’ material from Matthew; (c) that Luke's rearrangement of Matthew shows as much intelligence and purposefulness as Matthew's; and (d) that certain features of the ‘Q’ in Luke 3–7 betray the influence of Matthean redaction. Careful scrutiny of these arguments shows that (a) is only partially true; that Goodacre's assumptions about Lukan aesthetics (b) are open to serious objection; and that while (c) is true, Goodacre's argument in (d) ultimately cuts against his case against Q.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)