Skip to main content Accessibility help

‘The Lachmann Fallacy’

  • W. R. Farmer
Hide All

1 Dazu Westermann, a. a. O. S. 284 f., 298 u.ö

2 Finales ‘bis’ liegt auch vor in Hiob xiv. 14 ‘alle meine Dienstzeit wollte ich harren, bis daB (IS?) meine Ablosung kame’ und Ps. cxxiii. 2 ‘ sehen unsre Augen auf den Herrn, unsern Gott, bis (7$) er sich unser erbarmt’

3 ‘Lachmann's Argument’, N.T.S. XIII, no. 4 (July 1967), 368–78.

1 The Originality of Matthew(1951), p. 63.

2 Cp. pp. 36 ff.

3 ‘A “Skeleton in the Closet” of Gospel Research’, Biblical Research, VI (1961), 23–6.

4 William, Wrede, Das Messiasgeheimnis in den Evangelien(1901), pp. 148–9.Cp. Farmer, William R., ‘The Two Document Hypothesis as a Methodological Criterion in Synoptic Research’, A.T.R. xlviii (October 1966), 380–96. See especially pp. 387–9 and the note on Werner George Kümmel's Introduction to the New Testament (1966).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

New Testament Studies
  • ISSN: 0028-6885
  • EISSN: 1469-8145
  • URL: /core/journals/new-testament-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed