Skip to main content
×
Home

Material Criteria and their Clues for Dating*

  • Myriam Krutzsch (a1) and Ira Rabin (a2)
Abstract

This article is concerned with material aspects of the ‘Jesus’ Wife' fragment. Following an analysis of the papyrus which confirms that it is indeed of ancient manufacture, the scientific tests carried out on both the papyrus and the ink are critically assessed and shown to be of little or no value in determining the date of the writing.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We take this opportunity to thank Emanuel Kindzorra, who performed the measurements. Our thanks also go to Stephen Emmel for fruitful discussions and Stephen Goranson for his critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes
References
Hide All

1 Krutzsch M., ‘Das Papyrusmaterial im Wandel der antiken Welt’, APF 58 (2012) 101–8; ‘Einzelblatt und Rolle’, Gedenkschrift für Erika Endesfelder (ed. F. Feder, M. Fitzenreiter, G. Sperveslage; forthcoming).

2 Type ii corresponds to a three-layer sheet join. See Krutzsch M., ‘Das Papyrusmaterial im Wandel der antiken Welt’, APF 58 (2012) 101–8.

3 Similarly, in Codex Berolinensis Gnosticus 8502 the right sheet overlays the left one in all the preserved sheet joins. See Krutzsch M., ‘Beobachtungen zur Herstellungstechnik früher gnostischer Kodizes’, Zugänge zur Gnosis, Akten zur Tagung der Patristischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft vom 2.-5.1.2011 in Berlin-Spandau (Leuven 2013) 285–93.

4 See M. Krutzsch, ‘Criteria of Dating Papyrus Material’, Workshop on Dating Early Papyri and Manuscripts, Oklahoma 27 th–29 thMarch 2014 (forthcoming).

5 A comparison with the Nag Hammadi Codices and the Codex Berolinensis (Berlin P 8502) shows clear differences.

6 Azzarelli J. M., Goods J. B., Swager T. M., ‘Study of Two Papyrus Fragments with Fourier Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy’, HTR 107 (2014) 165 (supplement report).

7 Yardley J. T. and Hagadorn A., ‘Characterization of the Chemical Nature of the Black Ink in the Manuscript of the Gospel of Jesus's Wife through Micro-Raman Spectroscopy’, HTR 107 (2014) 162–4 (supplement report).

8 Hodgins G., ‘Accelerated Mass Spectrometry Radiocarbon Determination of Papyrus Samples’, HTR 107 (2014) 166–9 (supplement report).

9 Max J.-J. and Chapados C., ‘Isotope Effects in Liquid Water by Infrared Spectroscopy. iii: H2O and D2O Spectra from 6000 to 0 cm−1’, The Journal of Chemical Physics 131 (2009) 184505.

10 Rabin I. and Hahn O., Characterization of the Dead Sea Scrolls by Advanced Analytical Techniques (Analytical Methods 5; London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013) 4648–54.

11 Walton M., ‘The Pitfalls of Using Science to Authenticate Archaeological Artifacts’, SAS Bulletin 37 (2014) 14.

12 Tomasini E. P., Halac E. B., Reinoso M., Lisciab E. J. Di, Maiera M. S., ‘Micro-Raman Spectroscopy of Carbon-Based Black Pigments’, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 43 (2012) 1671–5.

13 A. Coccato, J. Jehlicka, L. Moens, P. Vandenabeele, ‘Raman Spectroscopy for the Investigation of Carbon Based Black Pigments’, 11th International GeoRaman Conference, held June 1–19, 2014 in St. Louis, Missouri, 5032, www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/georaman2014/pdf/5032.pdf.

14 I. Rabin, ‘Analysis of the Inks from a Roman Inkwell’, Gleanings From the Caves: Dead Sea Scrolls and Artefacts of the Schoyen Collection (ed. T. Elgvin; forthcoming).

15 C. Askeland, ‘The Forgery of the Lycopolitan Gospel of John’, http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.de, 27 April 2014.

16 S. Emmel, ‘The Codicology of the New Coptic (Lycopolitan) Gospel of John Fragment (and its Relevance for Assessing the Genuineness of the Recently Published Coptic “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” Fragment)', http://alinsuciu.com/2014/06/22/guest-post-stephen-emmel-the-codicology-of-the-new-coptic-lycopolitan-gospel-of-john-fragment-and-its-relevance-for-assessing-the-genuineness-of-the-recently-published-coptic-go-2/, 22 June 2014; slightly revised 2nd version: http://www.uni-muenster.de/IAEK/ (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Ägyptologie und Koptologie), 6 August 2014.

17 G. W. Schwendner, ‘The “Gospel of Jesus[’] Wife” as a Questioned Document: What Would Simulated Ancient Writing Look Like?', http://www.academia.edu/6860965/the_gospel_of_jesus_wife_as_a_questioned_document_what_would_simulated_ancient_writing_look_like, 24 April 2014.

18 Askeland, ‘The Forgery of the Lycopolitan Gospel of John’.

* We take this opportunity to thank Emanuel Kindzorra, who performed the measurements. Our thanks also go to Stephen Emmel for fruitful discussions and Stephen Goranson for his critical reading of the manuscript.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

New Testament Studies
  • ISSN: 0028-6885
  • EISSN: 1469-8145
  • URL: /core/journals/new-testament-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 227 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.