5 Cf. e.g. Metzger, , Textual Commentary, 176Google Scholar; Greijdanus, S., Het Evangelie naar de Beschrijving van Lucas (v. 2, Amsterdam: Bottenburg, 1941; Kommentaar op het Nieuwe Testament) 149Google Scholar; Burkitt, F. C., ‘On Luke 22. 17–20’, JTS 28 (1927) 180Google Scholar; Kilpatrick, G. D., ‘Luke 22. 19b–20’, JTS 47 (1946) 51Google Scholar; The Eucharist in Bible and Liturgy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983) 31–2Google Scholar; Chadwick, H., ‘The Shorter Version of Luke 22. 15–20’, HTR 50 (1957) 252CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marshall, I. H., The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Exeter: Paternoster, 1978) 800Google Scholar; Schürmann, H., Traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu den synoptischen Evangelien (Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1968, Kommentare und Beiträge zum Alten und Neuen Testament) 172, 177Google Scholar; Taylor, V., The Passion Narrative of St. Luke. A Critical and Historical Investigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972, SNTS Monograph Series 19) 55Google Scholar; Jeremias, J., Die Abendmahlsworte Jesu (2nd ed., Göt-tingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1949) 76–7Google Scholar; Rese, M., ‘Zur Problematik von Kurz- und Langtext in Lk 22. 17 ff.’, NTS 22 (1976) 30–1Google Scholar; Zahn, T., Das Evangelium des Lucas (1st & 2nd ed., Leipzig: Deichert, 1913, Kommentar zum Neuen Testament) 676–7Google Scholar; Stagg, F., ‘The Lord's Supper in the New Testament’, Review and Expositor 66 (1969) 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar