Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T20:39:48.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swedish VP-Topicalization and Yiddish Verb-Topicalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Gunnel Källgren  and
Ellen F. Prince
Gunnel Källgren
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden;
Ellen F. Prince
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we consider Swedish Finite VP-Topicalization and Yiddish Finite-Verb Topicalization, which share certain interesting features that have implications for Germanic syntax and for syntactic theory in general. Although neither construction contains a gap, we argue that both are products of Movement, but with a lexically realized trace, and that this phenomenon is crucially related to Movement of finite verbs. The arguments are based on the distribution of aspectual types, lexical and phonological phenomena, the V/2 Constraint, Subjacency, and discourse phenomena.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , June 1989 , pp. 47 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Davis, L. J. & Prince, E. F. 1986. Yiddish Verb-Topicalization and the Notion ‘Lexical Integrity’. In Farley, A., Farley, P. & McCullough, K.-E. (eds.), Papers from the 22nd Regional Meeting, CLS.Google Scholar
Diesing, M. 1987. Verb-Second in Yiddish and the Nature of the Subjct Position. Ms.Google Scholar
Engdahl, E. 1979. Acceptable Extractions Out of Complex NPs. Presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Engdahl, E. & Ejerhed, E. (eds.), 1982. Readings on Unbounded Depedencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå Studies in the Humanitites 43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Källgren, G. 1972. Restiktioner på verbfrasframflything. Papers from the Institute of Linguistics, Publication 13. Univ. of Stocholm.Google Scholar
Maling, J. & Zaenen, A. 1981. Germanic Word Order and the Fromat of Surface Filters. In Heny, F. (ed.), Binding and Filtering. London: Croom Helm. Pp. 255–278.Google Scholar
Prince, E.F. 1981. Topicalizaiton, Focus-Movement, and Yiddish-Movement: A Pragmatic Differentitaiton. In Alford, D. et al. (eds.), Proceeidngs of the 7th Annual Meeting, BLS. Pp. 249–264.Google Scholar
Waletzky, J. 1980. Topicalization in Yiddish. In Herzog, M., KirskenblattGimblett, B., Miron, D. & Wisse, R. (eds.), The Field of Yiddsih, Studies in Language, Folklore, and Literature. 4th collection. Philadelphia: ISHI. Pp. 237–316.Google Scholar
Ward, G. 1985. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar