Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:59:36.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Analysis of Language According to Carl Svedelius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Olli Kuure
Olli Kuure
Affiliation:
Department of Nordic Languages, University of Oulu, Box 191, 90101 Oulu, Finland.
Get access

Abstract

The work of a Swedish linguist, Carl Svedelius (1861–1951), though fairly brief and unaccomplished as it was, deserves a closer look from the point of view of today's linguistics. Svedelius himself characterized his own approach with the term “den verklighetsbetonade eller funktionalistiska språ;kanalysen”-i.e. he emphasized the referential or “real” and functional dimensions of language. Thus, the object of study should be “det sammanhängande språ;ket”, language as a whole. The basic unit in the comprehensive study of language is “une communication”, in modern terms, an utterance. Svedelius distinguishes two main categories of utterances: Utterances of process describe different events in life, whereas utterances of relation classify and describe different phenomena in reality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , June 1990 , pp. 49 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. 1971. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1979. Performative-Constative. In Searle, J. R. (ed.) The Philosophy of Language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1979. Elementer, funktioner og strukturer i sproget. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Halle, M. 1980. Fundamentals of Language. Janua Linguarum Minor. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljunggren, R. 1926. Om den opersonliga konstruktionen. Uppsala: E. Berlings nya boktryckeri AB.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1976. Basic Problems of Neurolinguistics. The Hague-Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, B. 1970. Nya vägar inom språ;kforskningen. 4. genomsedda uppl. Stockholm: Språ;kförlaget.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. 1899. C. Svedelius. L'analyse du langage appliquée à la langue francaise. Review in Litteraturblatt für germanische und romanische Philologie, Febr.-März, pp. 49–52.Google Scholar
Neumann, W. 1983. über Dialektik in der Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. In Linguistische Studien. Reihe A. Arbeitsberichte 113/II. Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR. Zentralinstitut fülr Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, pp. 94–109.Google Scholar
Noréen, A. 1903. Vå;rt språ;k. Första bandet. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Svedelius, C. 1897. L'analyse du langage appliquée à la langue française. Thèse pour le doctorat. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Svedelius, C. 1901. Was charakterisiert die Satzanalys des Französichen am meisten? In Uppsatser i romansk filologi tillāgnade professor P. A. Geijer på; hans sextioå;rsdag den 9 april 1901. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 25–56.Google Scholar
Svedelius, C. 1944. Språ;kanalys. Uppsala och Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Szönyi, E. 1973. Kodàly's Principles in Practice. London: Boosey & Hawkes.Google Scholar
Wallin, I. 1936. Om detgrammatiska subjektet. Akad. avh. Uppsala: Appelberg.Google Scholar
Wellander, E. 1946. Sprākanalys. Review in Svenska Dagbladet 29/3.Google Scholar