Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The cognitive status of stød

  • Sara Juul Clausen (a1) and Line Burholt Kristensen (a1)
Abstract

The Danish prosodic phenomenon stød is associated with a specific range of suffixes including the singular definite suffixes -en and -et. Diachronically, as well as distributionally, stød is related to Swedish/Norwegian accent 1, but unlike accent 1, stød is seen as phonetically and phonologically marked. Keeping in mind the cross-distribution between phonetic/phonological markedness and distributional patterns, we investigate here whether stød is also related to accent 1 when it comes to cognitive markedness. We present the results of a psycholinguistic study in which participants attended to words that were either appropriate combinations of prosody (stød vs. non-stød) and suffix (singular definite -en/-et vs. plural indefinite -e) or mismatches between prosody and suffix. Participants gave slower and more inaccurate responses to mismatches. This effect of mismatch was most pronounced for words with non-stød stems, indicating that the cognitive markedness status of stød corresponds to that of accent 2.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Azuma, Tamiko & van Orden, Guy C.. 1997. Why SAFE is better than fast: The relatedness of a word's meaning affects lexical decision times. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 484504.
Basbøll, Hans. 2003. Prosody, productivity and word structure: The stød pattern of Modern Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26, 544.
Basbøll, Hans. 2005. The Phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Basbøll, Hans. 2008. Stød, diachrony and the non-stød model. In Barnes, Michael, Bremmer, Rolf H. Jr., Lerchner, Gotthard & Nielsen, Hans F. (eds.), North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE), vol. 54/55, 147189. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Basbøll, Hans. 2013. Ordskemaet og Ikke-Stød. In Duncker, Dorthe, Hansen, Anne Mette & Skovgaard-Petersen, Karen (eds.), Betydning og Forståelse. Festskrift til Hanne Ruus, 137148. København: Københavns Universitet, Selskab for Nordisk Filologi.
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5 (9/10), 341345.
Brink, Lars, Lund, Jørn, Heger, Steffen & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 1991. Den Store Danske Udtaleordbog. København: Munksgaard.
Clark, Andy. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3), 181204.
Givón, Talmy. 1991. Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language 15 (2), 335370.
Grønnum, Nina. 2005. Fonetik og fonologi – almen dansk, 3. udgave. København: Akademisk Forlag.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42, 2570.
Jastrzembski, James E. 1981. Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology 13 (2), 278305.
Lahiri, Aditi, Wetterlin, Alison & Jönsson-Steiner, Elisabet. 2005. Lexical specification of tone in North Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28, 6196.
Lahiri, Aditi, Wetterlin, Alison & Jönsson-Steiner, Elisabet. 2006. Scandinavian lexical tone: Prefixes and compounds. In Bruce, Gösta & Horne, Merle (eds.), Nordic Prosody IX, 167175. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
McArthur, Tom. 2013. The Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Misyak, Jennifer B., Christiansen, Morten H. & Tomlin, J. Bruce. 2010. Sequential expectations: The role of prediction-based learning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (1), 138153.
Nielsen, Peter Juul. 2012. Morphology Reconsidered: Theoretical Issues and Studies in Nonfinite Verbforms in Danish. Ph.D. dissertation, Roskilde University.
Peirce, Jonathan W. 2007. PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162 (1), 813.
Quist, Pia. 2015. Stødgrænsen. Dialekt.dk, Nordisk Forskningsinstitut, University of Copenhagen. http://dialekt.ku.dk/dialekter/eksempler/navneorenes_koen/stodgransen/ (accessed 11 January 2015).
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Riad, Tomas. 1998. The origin of Scandinavian tone accents. Diachronica XV (1), 6398.
Riad, Tomas. 2000. The origin of Danish stød. In Lahiri, Aditi (ed.), Analogy, Levelling, Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology, 261300. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Rischel, Jørgen. 2008. Morphemic tone and word tone in Eastern Norwegian. In Grønnum, Nina, Gregersen, Frans & Basbøll, Hans (eds.), Sound Structure in Language, 167174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roll, Mikael, Horne, Merle & Lindgren, Magnus. 2010. Word accents and morphology – ERPs of Swedish word processing. Brain Research 1330, 114123.
Roll, Mikael, Söderström, Pelle & Horne, Merle. 2011. The marked status of accent 2 in Central Swedish. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 17101713.
Roll, Mikael, Söderström, Pelle & Horne, Merle. 2013. Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain. Brain Research 1520, 116120.
Söderström, Pelle, Roll, Mikael & Horne, Merle. 2012. Processing morphologically conditioned word accents. The Mental Lexicon 7, 7789.
Wetterlin, Alison & Lahiri, Aditi. 2012. Tonal alternations in Norwegian compounds. The Linguistic Review 29 (2), 279320.
World Medical Association. 2002. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Nursing Ethics 9 (1), 105109.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Nordic Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0332-5865
  • EISSN: 1502-4717
  • URL: /core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 189 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.