Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-pmsz9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T11:13:19.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting Objectis. A Dubious Constraint on Norwegian pronominalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Jon Erik Hagen
Jon Erik Hagen
Affiliation:
Nordisk Institutt, Postboks 23, 5014 Bergen-Universitet, Norway.
Get access

Abstract

An interesting restriction on Norwegian identity-of-sense anaphoric reference when the anaphor occurs as second object is discussed. Fretheim (1974) proposed to account for this by a global rule constraining pronominalization in such contexts, and claimed that the necessity of this constraint renders any interpretive account of identity-of-sense anaphoric reference untenable. The present paper purports to demonstrate the contrary, that Fretheim's observations in fact provide support for an interpretive theory of identify-of-sense anaphora as far as Norwegian is concerned.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , June 1979 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. 1971: Deep Structure, Surface Structure and Semantic Interpretation. In Steinberg, D. and Jacobovits, L. (eds.) 1971: Semantics. An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge, NY., 183–216.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1973: Conditions on Transformations. In Anderson, S. R. and Kipoarsky, P. (eds.) 1973: A Festschrift to Morris Halle. Holt, N.Y., pp. 232–286.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. 1974: The Double Object Constraint on Norwegian Pronominalization. In Working Papers in Linguistics - Lingvistiske innlegg. No. 5, Oslo 1974.Google Scholar
Grinder, J. & Postal, P., 1971: Missing Antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 269–312.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1972: Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT, Cambridge Mass., 1972.Google Scholar
Postal, P. 1970: On Coreferential Complement Subject Deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 439–500.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. 1967: The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. MIT, Cambridge Mass., 1967.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1967: Constraints on Variables in Syntax. MIT doctoral dissertation. Available from Indian University Linguistics Club, Indian University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1969: Auxiliaries as Main Verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1, 77–102.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1972: The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort. In Peranteau, P., Levi, J. N.. and Phares, G. (eds.) 1972: Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago 1972, pp. 316–378.Google Scholar