Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T01:03:31.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Danish Motion Verbs: Syntactic Alternations and the Hypothesis of Semantic Determination

Review products

PedersenB. S.Danish Motion Verbs: Syntactic Alternations and the Hypothesis of Semantic Determination. Nordic Journal of Linguistics20, 63–89.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Bolette Sanford Pederson
Bolette Sanford Pederson
Affiliation:
Center for Sprogteknologi, Københavns Universitet, Njalsgade 80, 2300 S, Denmark. Email: bolette@cst.ku.dk
Get access

Extract

Danish motion verbs provide a good candidate for testing the hypothesis of semantic determination on Danish, a hypothesis most recently discussed by Levin (1993) in her description of English verb classes and alternations. A set of core meaning components for motion verbs is identified and a taxonomy of Danish motion verbs is produced. With the basic assumption that a word's meaning determines its syntactic potential, this paper gives an account of the syntactic alternations that Danish motion verbs can undergo, and exposes a more or less transparent relation between their syntax and semantics.

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , June 1997 , pp. 65 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

, Alonge, , Bes, , Braasch, , Calzolari, , Dini, , Emele, , Fillmore, , Heid, , Monachini, , Ostler, , Spanu & , Vliegen. 1993. Some Prominent Approaches to Syntactic and Lexical-Semantic Modelling in the View of DELIS Descriptive work. In Report from LRE-project: DELIS. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Andersson, H. 1994. Den Danske Ordbogs tekstkorpus. In Andersson, H., Henriksen, B., Asmussen, J. & Thomsen, K. T. (eds): Udarbejdelsen af Den Danske Ordbog. Selskab for Nordisk Filologi: Årsberetning 1992–1993.Google Scholar
Atkins, S. 1994. Word Meaning in the Lexicographical Process. Course material from EURALEX '94. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Atkins, S. & Fillmore, C. 1992. Starting where the dictionaries stop: the challenge of corpus lexicography. In Atkins, B. & Zampolli, A. (eds), Conceptual Approaches to the Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergenholtz, H. 1990. DK87-DK90: Dansk korpus med almensproglige tekster. In Kunøe, M. & Larsen, E. (eds), 3. Møde om Udforskning af Dansk Sprog, Århus Universitet.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, P. 1984. Elementcer dansk grammatik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Durst-Andersen, P. & Herslund, M. 1992. Prepositional Objects in Danish. Papers from the XIII Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Roskilde.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1985. Frames and the Semantics of Understanding. Quaderni di semantica VI:2. University of Bologna.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. 1971. Jensen er nede i postkassen med et brev. Konstruktioner med con-subjectum i moderee dansk. Danske Studier 1971. University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. 1972. Modal interessens - Nu bør det (komme) frem. Danske Studier. University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hansen, Aa. 1967. Moderne Dansk vols. 1-3. Copenhagen: Grafisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Hjortø, K. 1936. Lidt om bevægelsesverber. Skrift og Tale. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirchmeier-Andersen, S. (forthcoming). Valency and Linked Sentence Constructions in Modern Danish. Studies in Valency 2, Odense University.Google Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. 1991. The Lexical Semantics of Verbs of Motion: the Perspective from Unaccusativity. In Roca, I. (ed.), Thematic Structure. Berlin.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. 1995. Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimb, S. 1993. En formel analyse af danske dersoetninger. M.A. thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Ordbog over det Danske Sprog, bind 1-29, 1929-1992. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Ravin, Y. 1990. Lexical Semantics without Thematic Roles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skautrup, P. 1927. Bevaegelse. Et Hardsyssel mål, ordforråd 1-2. Copenhagen: Krohns Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (in press) ‘Typology and Rethoric: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish’. In , Shibani and , Thomsen (eds), Grammatical Constructions: Their Forms and Meanings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1975. Semantics and Syntax of Motion. In Kimball, J. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 4. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, vol. 3. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar