Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:09:17.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

French ‘Schwa’ Deletion in Natural Generative Phonology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Chantal Lyche
Affiliation:
Romansk inst. avd. A., University of Oslo. Norway.
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of french schea deletion where, in agreemant with some basic principles of natural Generative Phonology, all rules are obligatory and not extrinsically ordered. This analysis is at variance with Dell's (1973) treatmant. It is contended that even if, as suggested by Rudes (1976), marking each phonological rule for applying only within a certain tempo can eliminate from the phonological component true optional rules, a certain amount of optionality must still be allowed within a rule. Furthermore, the nature of French schwa deletion forces us to reject rudes' model where the output of a tempo is the input to the next faster one.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. 1974: The Organization of Phonology. Academic Press, New york.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. 1966: Studies in French and Comparative Phonetics. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Dell, F. 1973: Les règles et les sons: Introduction à la phonologie générative. Herman, Paris.Google Scholar
Dell, F. 1976a: Schwa précédé d'un groupe obstruante-liquide. Recherches Linguistiques 4, 75111. Université de Paris-Vincennes.Google Scholar
Dell, F. 1976b: Epenthèse et effacement de schwa dans les syllabes contiguës en français. To appear in the Proceedings of the Colloque de Phonologie Française, Luminy, 05 1976, B., de Cornulier and F., Dell eds.Google Scholar
Dell, , 1977: Paramètres syntaxiques et phonologiques qui favorisent l'épenthèse de schwa en français moderne. In Rohrer, C. ed. Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de Linguistique Théorique (Stuttgart 1975) pp. 141153. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. 1976: An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. 1974: The Role of Surface Phonetics Constraints in Natural Generative Phonology. In Natural Phonology Parasession, pp. 171183. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972: Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Long, M. 1978: On the Role of Selection Rules in a Generative Grammar. CLS 13, 339351.Google Scholar
Lyche, C. and Montreuil, J.-P. 1977: On the Status of French Mute e in Natural Generative Phonology. Unpublished Ms.Google Scholar
Pope, M. 1952: From Latin to Modern French. Manschester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Rudes, B. 1976: Lexical Representation and Variable Rules in Natural Generative Phonology. Glossa 10, 111150.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. 1974: The Phonology of Nasal Vowels in Modern French. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Venneman, T. 1972: Rule Inversion. Lingua 29, 209242.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J.-R. 1972: On the Formalization of Infinitive Sets of Phonological Rules. Quaterly Progress Report 104, 250256. Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J.-R. 1975: Problémes formels en phonologie générative. Rapport de Recherches 4, Laboratoire d'Automatique Documentaire et Linguistique. Université de Paris VII- Université de Paris-Vincennes.Google Scholar