Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T23:26:54.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Icelandic Word Order and Binary Branching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Anders Holmberg
Anders Holmberg
Affiliation:
Lillbybacken 9, 5tr., S-16372 Spånga, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Certain word order facts in Icelandic have been claimed, by several linguists, to provide evidence that Icelandic has no VP constituent (in s-structure) in sentences where the main verb is finite. If correct, this entails that Icelandic phrase structure is not always binary branching, contradicting the hypothesis that all phrase structure is binary branching. It is shown to be incorrect. A new theory of Icelandic sentence structure is presented, based on Platzack (in press), but strictly observing binary branching. The theory presented is shown to be empirically more adequate than the less constrainedĀ-nary branching theories.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , December 1985 , pp. 161 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baltin, M. 1982. A Landing Site Theory of Movement Rules. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 1–38.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. MIT Press: Cambridge Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fiva, T. 1985. NP-internal Chains in Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T. 1984. Transitivity. Grammatical relations in Government-Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 1983. The Finite Sentence in Swedish and English. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 3. Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 1984. On Raising in Icelandic and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 13. Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 1985. Case and Word Order in Icelandic and Swedish. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (forthcoming). Scandinavian Word Order.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. & Thompson, S. 1973. On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 465–499.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der & Smith, N. 1982. An Overview of Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. In Hulst, H. van der & Smith, N. (eds) The Structure of Phonological Representations. Dordrecht: Foris pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1981 a. On Certain Differences Between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371. Also in Kayne (1984a).Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1981 b. Unambiguous Paths. In May, R. & Koster, J. (eds) Levels of Syntactic Representation. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 143–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. 1984 a. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. 1984 b. Principles of Particle Constructions. Unpubl. ms., University of Paris 8.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. & Saito, M. 1984. On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 253–289.Google Scholar
Maling, J. 1980. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt Mái 2, 173–193.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. 1985. Morphology and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193–246.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. 1982 a. Modern Grammatisk Teori. Liber Förlag: Lund.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. 1982 b. Transitive Adjectives in Swedish: a Phenomenon with Implications for the Theory of Abstract Case. The Linguistic Review 2, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. 1983. Existential Sentences in English, German, Icelandic, and Swedish. In Karlsson, F. (ed.) Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics vol. 1. University of Helsinki, Department of General Linguistics, Publications no. 9.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. 1985. Word Order in Generative Transformational Grammar. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. (in press) Comp, Infl, and Germanic Word Order. To appear in Hellan, L. & Christensen, K. K. (eds) Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. (to appear) The Position of the Finite Verb in Swedish. To appear in Haider, H. (ed) V/2 in the Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. 1983. Sagnliðurinn í íslensku. Íslenskt Mái 5, 7–28.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. 1984. Icelandic Word Order and það-insertion. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 8. Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. Á. 1985. Subordinate V/l in Icelandic: how to Explain a Root Phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 18. Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1981. The Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1983. Subjects across Categories. The Linguistic Review 2, 285–312.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. T. 1983. Parametric Variation in Phrase Structure: a Case Study. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1984. Some Points on Icelandic Word Order. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 8. Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. (in press) On Auxiliaries, AUX and VPs in Icelandic. To appear in Hellan, L. & Christensen, K. K. (eds.) Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H., (to appear) V/l, V/2, V/3 in Icelandic. To appear in Haider, H. (ed.) V/2 in the Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar