Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T23:34:27.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incremental “Walls”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Mila Dimitrova-Vulchanova
Mila Dimitrova-Vulchanova
Affiliation:
Department of English, NTNU, 7055 Dragvoll, Trondheim, Norway. Email: mila.vulchanova@hf.ntnu.no
Get access

Extract

The present paper addresses the well-known alternation type “spray paint on the wall/ spray the wall with paint” which has received extensive attention in the literature. The discussion is based on Germanic data (English, German and Norwegian) and data from one Slavic language (Bulgarian). In trying to amend previous proposals (e.g. Tenny 1987, 1994, Jackendoff 1996) and resolve issues left open in those works, the current analysis suggests that the semantic properties of both entities involved in a situation denoted by “spray” are relevant for the aspectual properties of the respective constructions headed by “spray”, i.e. both the substance sprayed, and the surface subjected to spraying. It is proposed that the aspectual properties of such constructions reside primarily in the semantic characterization, including the ontological properties, of the latter, coupled to their linguistic realization as distinct types of noun phrases.

Type
Review Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , June 1998 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. 1996. Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. PhD dissertation, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. 1998. A Typology of Measures. In Haukioja, T. (ed.), Proceedings of the 16th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Turku, Finland: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language 67, 547–619.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. & Dimitrova-Vulchanova, , forthcoming. The Sign Model of Grammar. A monograph.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1992. Parts and Boundaries. In Levin, B. & Pinker, S. (eds), Lexical and Conceptual Semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1996. The Proper Treatment of Measuring Out, Telicity, and Perhaps Even Quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 305–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M. 1992. Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution. In Sag, I. & Szabolcsi, A. (eds), Lexical Matters. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Leland Stanford Junior University, pp. 29–53.Google Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. 1987. Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. 1997. Events as Dividuals: Aspectual Composition and Event Semantics. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS Working Papers 97–004.Google Scholar