Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T06:09:18.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sentence-Medial NP-Adjuncts in English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Liliane Haegeman
Liliane Haegeman
Affiliation:
U.F.R. Angellier, Université Charles de Gaulle – Lille 3, B.P. 149, FR-59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq – Cedex, France. E-mail: l.haegeman@skynet.be
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, I want to show that, contrary to what is sometimes claimed in the literature, NP-adjuncts of the kind tomorrow, last week, etc., are attested sentence-medially in English. This pattern would seem to be particularly frequent in journalistic prose. Second, I examine and refute an analysis which takes such sentence-medial NP-adjuncts to be analysed as IP-external adjuncts across which the subject has been topicalised or focalised. Though such an analysis would be in keeping with the often proposed view that NP-adjuncts do not occupy an IP-internal position, I show that it raises a host of empirical problems and that it is not tenable. The conclusion is that NP-adjuncts cannot be analysed as being IP-external and that they occupy a high IP-internal position.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , June 2002 , pp. 79 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb Placement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltin, Mark. 1982. A Landing Site Theory of Movement Rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 13.1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2001. Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP Sublayers. Ms. University of Padova, CNR.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans. 1986. Gaps and Dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Buysschaert, Joost. 1982. Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials. AWLsK, Klasse der letteren 44, Nr. 99.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Subjects and Clause Structure. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax. London: Longman, pp. 33–63.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2000. Towards a Cartography of Subject Positions. Ms. University of Venice, SSLM1T University of Bologna.Google Scholar
McCawley, James. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale, a Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Jim. 1991 Adjunction, Selection and Embedded Verb Second. Ms, UCSC.Google Scholar
Costa, João. 1996. Adverb Positioning and V-Movement in English: Some More Evidence. Studia Linguistica, I, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 1991. Topicalization, Inversion and Complementizers in English. In Delfitto, Denis; Everaert, Martin, Evers, Arnold & Stuurman, Frits (eds), Going Romance and Beyond. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 1993. Evidence against ECP Accounts of the that-t Effect. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 557–561.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 1996. On Distinguishing A-Movements. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 445–463.Google Scholar
Duval, Frédérique. In progress. Mid Positions of Temporal NP and PP Adjuncts in Journalistic Prose. Mémoire de maîtrise, University Charles de Gaulle, Lille III.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1984. Mid-Position of Time Adverbials in Journalistic Prose. An Attempt at an Explanation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 15, 73–76.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2001. Speculations on Adverbial Fronting and the Left Periphery. Ms. University of Lille III.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Grange, Corinne. 1989. Subordinate Clauses: Adjuncts or Arguments. The Status of het in Dutch. In Jaspers, Danny; Klooster, Wim, Putseys, Yvan & Seuren, Pieter (eds), Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon. Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar
Hasseigård, Hilde. 1996. Where and When: Positional and Functional Conventions for Sequences of Time and Space Adverbials in Present-Day English. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's Generalisation. Studia Linguistica, 53, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan and Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 465–497.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Sven. 1964. Adverbial Positions in English. Stockholm: AB Student Book.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1999a. The Word Orders of English and Dutch: Collective vs. Individual Checking. Ms. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1999b. Sentence-Final Adverbials and Stress. Ms. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Larreya, Paul & Rivière, Claude. 1999. Grammaire explicative de l'anglais. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1985. Bare-NP Adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 595–622.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Move Alpha. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maki, Hideki; Kaiser, Lizanne & Ochi, Massao. 1999. Embedded Topicalisation in English and Japanese. Lingua, 109, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2001. T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: a Life in Language. Cambridge. MA: MIT press, pp. 355–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1997. Notes on clause structure. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 237–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 1992. Situation Theory and the Semantics of Proportional Expressions, Ph.D. Diss. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.): Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. Locality and Left Periphery. Ms. University of Siena.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2001. On Object Shift, Scrambling, and the PIC. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 39.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. In press. Subject positions and the placement of adverbials. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP. Oxford University Press, pp. 199–240.Google Scholar