Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wiemer, Björn and Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður 2014. Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic.

    Wood, Jim 2014. Reflexive -st verbs in Icelandic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 1387.

    Wood, Jim and Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann 2014. LetCausatives and (A)symmetricdat-nomConstructions. Syntax, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 269.

    Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli 2013. Two types of case variation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 36, Issue. 01, p. 5.

    Thráinsson, Höskuldur 2013. Full NP Object Shift: The Old Norse Puzzle and the Faroese Puzzle revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 36, Issue. 02, p. 153.

    Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann 2012. Minimalist C/case. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 191.

    Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann 2012. Case variation: Viruses and star wars. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 35, Issue. 03, p. 313.

    Barðdal, Jóhanna 2011. The rise of Dative Substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar account. Lingua, Vol. 121, Issue. 1, p. 60.

    Barðdal, Jóhanna 2011. Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy. Morphology, Vol. 21, Issue. 3-4, p. 619.

    Wood, Jim 2011. Stylistic Fronting in spoken Icelandic relatives. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 34, Issue. 01, p. 29.


Variation in subject case marking in Insular Scandinavian

  • Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson (a1) and Thórhallur Eythórsson (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 December 2005

The Insular Scandinavian (IS) languages, Icelandic and Faroese, exhibit variation in subject case marking, primarily pertaining to an older idiosyncratic case and an innovative case that instantiates a regular pattern. This variation occurs to a considerable degree at the level of the individual speaker. We argue that this intra-speaker variation in IS involves optionality within one grammar and not competition between two different grammars or dialects in the sense of Kroch (1989, 1994). Mainly on the basis of data from the so-called Dative Substitution (DS) in Icelandic, we show that this variation does not involve any kind of parameter, and that it is not the result of dialect contact, as the grammar competition analysis would entail.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Nordic Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0332-5865
  • EISSN: 1502-4717
  • URL: /core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *