Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature

  • Bálint Bajomi (a1), Andrew S. Pullin (a2), Gavin B. Stewart (a2) and András Takács-Sánta (a1)

Abstract

We examined the literature on animal reintroductions to assess the challenges facing individual conservation practitioners who wish to access, synthesize and interpret available evidence to inform their decision making. We undertook an extensive search in eight electronic literature databases, using seven different keyword combinations, and added the content of four bibliographies on reintroductions. We found 3,826 potentially relevant publications totalling at least 29,290 pages of text. Taxonomic bias is apparent in the distribution of general and conservation scientific literature and in reintroduction programmes. We examined whether the literature on reintroductions is biased in a similar way. Comparing the distribution of reintroduction publications to numbers of species, reintroduction programmes and the general conservation literature, there is a marked taxonomic bias favouring vertebrates, especially birds and mammals. The bias in relation to reintroduction programmes is surprising and indicates that managers working with invertebrates and amphibians are less willing and/or less able to publish their results than those working with mammals and birds. The reasons for this are unclear. The growth of the cumulative body of literature can be depicted by a sigmoid curve. Almost 40% of the items were scientific journal articles distributed across 335 journals. The large, ever-growing and dispersed evidence base results in an increased need for reviews, which must be systematic to minimize bias.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Centre for Environmental Science, Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences, Pázmány P. s. 1/A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail bb@greenfo.hu

References

Hide All
Armstrong, D. (2008) Publications on Reintroduction in Oceania. IUCN Reintroduction Specialist Group, Oceania Section, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Http://www.massey.ac.nz/~darmstro/publications.htm [accessed 4 February 2010].
Bajomi, B. (2007) Factors Influencing the Success Rate of Reintroduction of Endangered Animal Species. Systematic Review No. 29. Centre for Evidence-based Conservation, Bangor, UK. Http://www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Protocol29.pdf [accessed 30 January 2009].
Báldi, A. & McCollin, D. (2003) Island ecology and contingent theory: the role of spatial scale and taxonomic bias. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 13.
Bonnet, X., Shine, R. & Lourdais, O. (2002) Taxonomic chauvinism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 13.
Bradford, S.C. (1934) Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 8586.
Carneiro, F.M., Nabout, J.C. & Bini, L.M. (2008) Trends in the scientific literature on phytoplankton. Limnology, 9, 153158.
Clark, J.A. & May, R.M. (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science, 297, 191192.
Czech, B., Kausman, P.R. & Borkhataria, R. (1998) Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conservation Biology, 12, 11031112.
Easterbrook, P.J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J.A. & Matthews, D.R. (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. The Lancet, 337, 867872.
Fazey, I., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biological Conservation, 124, 6373.
Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation, 96, 111.
Garfield, E. (2007) Charting the Growth of Science. Presented at the Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadelphia, USA. Http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/chartinggrowthofscience2007.pdf [accessed 4 February 2010].
Garg, A.X., Iansavichus, A.V., Kastner, M., Walters, L.A., Wilczynski, N., McKibbon, K.A. et al. . (2006) Lost in publication: half of all renal practice evidence is published in non-renal journals. Kidney International, 70, 19952005.
Griffith, B., Scott, J.M., Carpenter, J.W. & Reed, C. (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science, 245, 477480.
Howe, D., Costanzo, M., Fey, P., Gojobori, T., Hannick, L., Hide, W. et al. . (2008) Big data: the future of biocuration. Nature, 455, 4750.
IUCN (2008) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Summary Statistics. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Http://www.redlist.org/static/stats [accessed 15 February 2009].
Jennions, M.D. & Moller, A.P. (2002) Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the ‘trim and fill’ method. Biological Reviews, 77, 211222.
Kenyon, K.A. (1995) Reintroduction of Captive Animals into Their Native Habitat: A Bibliography. National Zoological Park Branch, Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/zoo/reintrod.pdf [accessed 4 February 2010].
Koricheva, J. (2003) Non-significant results in ecology: a burden or a blessing in disguise? Oikos, 102, 397401.
Lawler, J.J., Aukema, J.E., Grant, J.B., Halpern, B.S., Kareiva, P., Nelson, C.R. et al. . (2006) Conservation science: a 20-year report card. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 473480.
Lee, K., Bacchetti, P. & Sim, I. (2008) Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis. PLoS Medicine, 5, e191.
Mabe, M. & Amin, M. (2001) Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics, 51, 147162.
Márkus, F. (2004) Gerinces állatfajok visszatelepítésének természetrajza Magyarországon, 1970-től napjainkig. Természetvédelmi Közlemények, 11, 359369. [in Hungarian, with English abstract]
Martin-Lopez, B., Montes, C., Ramirez, L. & Benayas, J. (2009) What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biological Conservation, 142, 13701380.
Pullin, A.S., Knight, T.M., Stone, D.A. & Charman, K. (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation, 119, 245252.
Pullin, A.S. & Stewart, G.B. (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20, 16471656.
Scholey, J.M. & Harrison, J.E. (2003) Publication bias: raising awareness of a potential problem in dental research. British Dental Journal, 194, 235-237.
Seddon, P.J., Armstrong, D.P. & Maloney, R.F. (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology, 21, 303312.
Seddon, P.J., Soorae, P.S. & Launay, F. (2005) Taxonomic bias in reintroduction projects. Animal Conservation, 8, 5158.
Short, J., Bradshaw, S.D., Giles, J., Prince, R.I.T. & Wilson, G.R. (1992) Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia, Macropodoidea) in Australia—a review. Biological Conservation, 62, 189204.
Snyder, N.F.R., Derrickson, S.R., Beissinger, S.R., Wiley, J.W., Smith, T.B., Toone, W.D. & Miller, B.J. (1996) Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology, 10, 338348.
Soorae, P.S. (2002) The IUCN/SSC Re-Introduction Specialist Group (RSG) Literature Database. IUCN Reintroduction Specialist Group, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Standovár, T. (2001) A természetvédelmi biológia helyzete Magyarországon egy országos felmérés alapján. Természetvédelmi Közlemények, 9, 114.
Teixeira, C.P., de Azevedo, C.S., Mendl, M., Cipreste, C.F. & Young, R.J. (2007) Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress. Animal Behaviour, 73, 113.
Wilson, J.R.U., Proches, S., Braschler, B., Dixon, E.S. & Richardson, D.M. (2007) The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 409414.
Wilson, J.R.U., Proches, S., Braschler, B., Dixon, E.S. & Richardson, D.M. (2008) Organismal complexity is an indicator of species existence value—the authors reply. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 299300.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature

  • Bálint Bajomi (a1), Andrew S. Pullin (a2), Gavin B. Stewart (a2) and András Takács-Sánta (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.