Skip to main content
×
Home

Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard

  • Evangelia Apostolopoulou (a1) and William M. Adams (a2)
Abstract

We are grateful to ten Kate & von Hase (2016) and Dempsey & Collard (2016) for their insightful and constructive responses to our article on biodiversity offsetting (Apostolopoulou & Adams, 2015a). They agree with us that conservationists need to think very carefully about offsetting and its implications for nature conservation. They differ substantially in where that thinking should lead. Ten Kate & von Hase believe that offsetting is fine if it is done properly. Dempsey & Collard are profoundly uneasy about its implications, and go deeper into the way conservation is folded into economic development, ‘smoothing the way for new industrial scale projects’.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail elia.apostolopoulou@ouce.ox.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Apostolopoulou E. & Adams W.M. (2015a) Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it. Oryx, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315000782.
Apostolopoulou E. & Adams W.M. (2015b) Neoliberal capitalism and conservation in the post-crisis era: the dialectics of ‘green’ and ‘un-green’ grabbing in Greece and the UK. Antipode, 47, 1535.
Bayon R., Fox J. & Carroll N. (eds) (2008) Conservation and Biodiversity Banking: A Guide to Setting Up and Running Biodiversity Credit Trading Systems. Earthscan, London, UK.
Burkett P. (1997) Nature in Marx reconsidered: a silver anniversary assessment of Alfred Schmidt's concept of nature in Marx. Organization & Environment, 10, 164183.
Dempsey J. & Collard R. (2016) If biodiversity offsets are a dead end for conservation, what is the live wire? A response to Apostolopoulou & Adams. Oryx, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000752.
Harvey D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Robinson J.G. (2011) Corporate greening: is it significant for biodiversity conservation? Oryx, 45, 309310.
Second Life (2016) Http://secondlife.com [accessed 19 October 2016].
Smith N. (2010) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (3rd edition). Verso, New York, USA.
TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Geneva, Switzerland.
ten Kate K. & von Hase A. (2016) Correct framing of biodiversity offsets and conservation: a response to Apostolopoulou & Adams. Oryx, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316001022.
Vaughan A. (2016) Budget cuts threaten to weaken powers of England's nature watchdog. The Guardian. Https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/16/budget-cuts-threaten-to-weaken-powers-of-englands-nature-watchdog [accessed 21 October 2016].
Vlachou A. (2005) Environmental regulation: a value-theoretic and class-based analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 577599.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 30
Total number of PDF views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 383 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st November 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.