Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Bison with benefits: towards integrating wildlife and ranching sectors on a public rangeland in the western USA

  • Dustin H. Ranglack (a1) and Johan T. du Toit (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

The North American model of wildlife conservation, based on the public trust doctrine, is credited for the recovery of several charismatic wildlife species, including the plains bison Bison bison. In that model, wildlife is a public resource from which the private sector may not profit either individually or collectively. In recent years, however, resilience thinking is driving changes in the traditional state-run wildlife management model to allow for integrated multi-sector approaches at the landscape scale. A free-ranging herd of bison on public land in the Henry Mountains of Utah is used as a case study to consider if and how a community-based conservation programme could be developed for a state-managed wildlife resource to benefit all stakeholders. The Henry Mountains bison, which are disease-free, share the rangeland with cattle that are privately owned by individual ranchers and corporations with various economic goals and environmental values. The ranchers currently derive no benefits from the bison and have concerns regarding competition between bison and cattle. However, a threshold harvesting strategy with community participation could generate revenue to offset these concerns. It could also provide benefits to the local community, increase state revenue, and increase the size of the bison population while securing its long-term genetic viability. Implementation would initially require facilitation by policy specialists, after which we suggest a Henry Mountains bison partnership could serve as a model for bison recovery efforts elsewhere in North America.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Bison with benefits: towards integrating wildlife and ranching sectors on a public rangeland in the western USA
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Bison with benefits: towards integrating wildlife and ranching sectors on a public rangeland in the western USA
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Bison with benefits: towards integrating wildlife and ranching sectors on a public rangeland in the western USA
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail dhranglack@gmail.com
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C.R. Allen , G.S. Cumming , A.S. Garmestani , P.D. Taylor & B.H. Walker (2011) Managing for resilience. Wildlife Biology, 17, 337349.

F. Berkes (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18, 621630.

F. Berkes (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. PNAS, 104, 1518815193.

G. Caughley & C.J. Krebs (1983) Are big mammals simply little mammals writ large? Oecologia, 59, 717.

F.S. Chapin , S.R. Carpenter , G.P. Kofinas , C. Folke , N. Abel , W.C. Clark (2009) Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 241249.

C.G. Curtin & J.P. Parker (2014) Foundations of resilience thinking. Conservation Biology, 28, 912923.

J.C. Deutsch (2010) Synthesis: local and global solutions to the challenge of keeping rangelands wild. In Wild Rangelands: Conserving Wildlife While Maintaining Livestock in Semi-Arid Ecosystems (eds J.T. du Toit , R. Kock & J.C. Deutsch ), pp. 393402. Wiley-Blackwell and Zoological Society of London, Chichester, UK.

B.G. Dickson , L.J. Zachmann & C.M. Albano (2014) Systematic identification of potential conservation priority areas on roadless Bureau of Land Management lands in the western United States. Biological Conservation, 178, 117127.

J.T. du Toit (2002) Wildlife harvesting guidelines for community-based wildlife management: a southern African perspective. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 14031416.

C.H. Freese , K.E. Aune , D.P. Boyd , J.N. Derr , S.C. Forrest , C.C. Gates (2007) Second chance for the plains bison. Biological Conservation, 136, 175184.

P.G.H. Frost & I. Bond (2008) The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services. Ecological Economics, 65, 776787.

N.D. Halbert & J.N. Derr (2007) A comprehensive evaluation of cattle introgression into US federal bison herds. Journal of Heredity, 98, 112.

P.W. Hedrick (2009) Conservation genetics and North American bison (Bison bison). Journal of Heredity, 100, 411420.

T. Kuemmerle , V.C. Radeloff , K. Perzanowski , P. Kozlo , T. Sipko , P. Khoyetskyy (2011) Predicting potential European bison habitat across its former range. Ecological Applications, 21, 830843.

R. Lande , B.E. Sæther & S. Engen (1997) Threshold harvesting for sustainability of fluctuating resources. Ecology, 78, 13411350.

F. Madden (2004) Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9, 247257.

M.J. Manfredo , T.L. Teel & A.D. Bright (2003) Why are public values toward wildlife changing? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8, 287306.

W.D. Newmark & J.L. Hough (2000) Conserving wildlife in Africa: integrated conservation and development projects and beyond. BioScience, 50, 585592.

J. Organ & S. Mahoney (2007) The future of public trust: the legal status of the Public Trust Doctrine. The Wildlife Professional, 1, 1822.

D.H. Ranglack , S. Durham & J.T. du Toit (2015) Competition on the range: science vs perception in a bison–cattle conflict in the western USA. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 467474.

E.W. Sanderson , K.H. Redford , B. Weber , K. Aune , D. Baldes , J. Berger (2008) The ecological future of the North American bison: conceiving long-term, large-scale conservation of wildlife. Conservation Biology, 22, 252266.

J. Sayer , T. Sunderland , J. Ghazoul , J.-L. Pfund , D. Sheil , E. Meijaard (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. PNAS, 110, 83498356.

A. Spiteri & S.K. Nepal (2006) Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: a review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management, 37, 114.

T.L. Teel & M.J. Manfredo (2009) Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 24, 128139.

D. van Vuren & M.P. Bray (1983) Diets of bison and cattle on a seeded range in southern Utah. Journal of Range Management, 36, 499500.

D. van Vuren & M.P. Bray (1986) Population dynamics of bison in the Henry Mountains, Utah. Journal of Mammalogy, 67, 503511.

P.J. Weisberg , N.T. Hobbs , J.E. Ellis & M.B. Coughenour (2002) An ecosystem approach to population management of ungulates. Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 181198.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 146 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 557 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.