Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A botanical mystery solved by phylogenetic analysis of botanical garden collections: the rediscovery of the presumed-extinct Dracaena umbraculifera

  • Christine E. Edwards (a1), Burgund Bassüner (a1), Chris Birkinshaw (a2), Christian Camara (a2), Adolphe Lehavana (a2), Porter P. Lowry (a1), James S. Miller (a1), Andrew Wyatt (a1) and Peter Wyse Jackson (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

Extinction is the complete loss of a species, but the accuracy of that status depends on the overall information about the species. Dracaena umbraculifera was described in 1797 from a cultivated plant attributed to Mauritius, but repeated surveys failed to relocate it and it was categorized as Extinct on the IUCN Red List. However, several individuals labelled as D. umbraculifera grow in botanical gardens, suggesting that the species’ IUCN status may be inaccurate. The goal of this study was to understand (1) where D. umbraculifera originated, (2) which species are its close relatives, (3) whether it is extinct, and (4) the identity of the botanical garden accessions and whether they have conservation value. We sequenced a cpDNA region of Dracaena from Mauritius, botanical garden accessions labelled as D. umbraculifera, and individuals confirmed to be D. umbraculifera based on morphology, one of which is a living plant in a private garden. We included GenBank accessions of Dracaena from Madagascar and other locations and reconstructed the phylogeny using Bayesian and parsimony approaches. Phylogenies indicated that D. umbraculifera is more closely related to Dracaena reflexa from Madagascar than to Mauritian Dracaena. As anecdotal information indicated that the living D. umbraculifera originated from Madagascar, we conducted field expeditions there and located five wild populations; the species’ IUCN status should therefore be Critically Endangered because < 50 wild individuals remain. Although the identity of many botanical garden samples remains unresolved, this study highlights the importance of living collections for facilitating new discoveries and the importance of documenting and conserving the flora of Madagascar.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A botanical mystery solved by phylogenetic analysis of botanical garden collections: the rediscovery of the presumed-extinct Dracaena umbraculifera
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A botanical mystery solved by phylogenetic analysis of botanical garden collections: the rediscovery of the presumed-extinct Dracaena umbraculifera
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A botanical mystery solved by phylogenetic analysis of botanical garden collections: the rediscovery of the presumed-extinct Dracaena umbraculifera
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail christine.edwards@mobot.org
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Also at: Institut de systématique, évolution, et biodiversité, Unité mixte de Recherche 7205 (Centre national de la Recherche scientifique/Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle/École pratique des Hautes études, Université Pierre et Marie Curie), Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Baker J.G. (1877) Flora of Mauritius and the Seychelles. Reeve & Co., London, UK.
BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International) (2017) PlantSearch. Https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php [accessed 13 September 2013].
Bojer W. (1837) Hortus Mauritianus. Aimé Mamarot et Compagnie, Mauritius.
Buerki S., Callmander M.W., Schüpfer F., Ravokatra M., Küpfer P. & Alvarez N. (2009) Malagasy Dracaena Vand. ex L. (Ruscaceae): an investigation of discrepancies between morphological features and spatial genetic structure at a small evolutionary scale. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 280, 1528.
Byng J.W., Chase M.W., Christenhusz M.J.M., Fay M.F., Judd W.S., Mabberley D.J. et al. (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181, 120.
Callmander M.W., Phillipson P.B., Schatz G.E., Andriambololonera S., Rabarimanarivo M., Rakotonirina N. et al. (2011) The endemic and non-endemic vascular flora of Madagascar updated. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 144, 121125.
Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R. & Posada D. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods, 9, 772.
Dave's Garden (2007) Dracaena or Yucca? Http://davesgarden.com/community/forums/t/697465/#b [accessed 12 October 2017].
Doyle J.J. & Doyle J.L. (1987) A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 1115.
Edgar R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 119.
eMonocot (2010) Dracaena reflexa Lam. Http://e-monocot.org/taxon/urn:kew.org:wcs:taxon:304786 [accessed 21 September 2017].
Felsenstein J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783791.
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. 2nd edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
Jacquin N.J. (1797) Plantarum Rariorum Horti Caesarei Schoenbrunnensis.
Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S. et al. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 16471649.
Ladle R.J., Jepson P., Malhado A.C.M., Jennings S. & Barua M. (2011) The causes and biogeographical significance of species rediscovery. Frontiers of Biogeography, 3, 111118.
Lee T.E., Fisher D.O., Blomberg S.P. & Wintle B.A. (2017) Extinct or still out there? Disentangling influences on extinction and rediscovery helps to clarify the fate of species on the edge. Global Change Biology, 23, 621634.
Lu P.L. & Morden C.W. (2014) Phylogenetic relationships among Dracaenoid genera (Asparagaceae: Nolinoideae) inferred from chloroplast DNA loci. Systematic Botany, 39, 90104.
Madagascar Catalogue (2017) A Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Madagascar . Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, USA.
Marais W. & Coode M.J.E. (1978) 183. Lilacees. In Flore des Mascareignes (eds Bosser J., Cadet T., Julien H.R. & Marais W.), p. 20. Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute, Mauritius, and Royal Botanic Gardens (Kew), London, UK.
Rambaut A., Suchard M.A., Xie D. & Drummond A.J. (2014). Tracer v. 1.6. Http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ [accessed 17 October 2017].
Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S. et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539542.
Shaw J., Lickey E.B., Beck J.T., Farmer S.B., Liu W.S., Miller J. et al. (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany, 92, 142166.
Strahm W. (1998) Dracaena umbraculifera. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1998: e.T35017A9903551. Http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T35017A9903551.en [accessed 11 October 2017].
Swofford D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 4.10 beta 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, USA.
Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G. & Bouvet J. (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology, 17, 11051109.
Wright H. (1901) Observations on Dracaena reflexa Lam. Annals of the Royal Botanical Garden, Peradenia, 1, 165172.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 86 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 617 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th January 2018 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.